ACCESS HD: Comparing Catheters to Fistulas in Elderly Patients Starting Hemodialysis
ACCESS HD
ACCESS HD Pilot: A Randomized Trial Comparing Catheters to Fistulas in Elderly patientS Starting HemoDialysis
1 other identifier
interventional
100
2 countries
13
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is multi-center, parallel-arm, and open label. It will test the feasibility and safety of randomizing elderly patients with end-stage kidney failure starting hemodialysis with a tunneled/non-tunneled catheter to one of the following vascular access strategies: (a) attempt at fistula creation (intervention), or (b) continued use of a catheter (comparator). A total number of 100 participants will be enrolled in vanguard phase of the RCT. The rationale for this trial includes: (1) the importance of the intervention question related to the choice of vascular access for patients treated with hemodialysis; (2) lack of evidence from clinical trials for decision-making in this area (only observational studies are available); (3) existing studies which suggest that fistula use is associated with better patient outcomes are very prone to selection bias; (4) need for a clinical trial comparing the impact of the two most frequently chosen strategies for vascular access (catheter and fistula) in the hemodialysis population; and (5) a feasible and safe trial design. The results obtained from this vanguard phase of the RCT will determine the feasibility and safety of conducting a large RCT, which will be powered for the primary outcome of days spent in hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 21, 2022
July 1, 2022
8.8 years
January 26, 2016
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility; proportion of eligible people who are randomized (at least 25%)
42 months
Feasibility; proportion of those randomized to the intervention arm receiving a fistula attempt within 90 days of randomization (at least 80%)
42 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Descriptive; reasons for exclusion of all screened participants (feasibility)
42 months
Descriptive; reasons that people decline to participate (feasibility)
42 months
Descriptive; reasons people are considered ineligible for a fistula attempt (feasibility)
42 months
Descriptive; reasons for delayed access to fistula surgery (feasibility)
42 months
Safety; expected procedure-related outcomes for both catheter and fistula treatment strategies that occur within 7 days of the execution of any access related intervention
7 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORCatheter is a method of vascular access for hemodialysis. It consists of a long, thin plastic tube and may be either tunnelled or non-tunnelled.
Fistula
EXPERIMENTALFistula is a type of vascular access strategy for hemodialysis in which a direct connection of an artery to a vein is created. It is intended to provide an access with good blood flow that can last for decades.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients age ≥ 55; (AUS sites : adult patients age ≥ 65);
- a). Started hemodialysis using a tunnelled, or non-tunnelled catheter for vascular access AND ≤ 1 previously unsuccessful fistula attempt; OR b).Changing over from peritoneal dialysis AND no functioning arteriovenous fistula available at HD start;
- Treated with hemodialysis for 365 days or less at the time of consent (374 days or less at the time of randomization);
- Clinically and cognitively stable (able to provide consent within 365 days of hemodialysis start);
- Hemodialysis is the intended modality of treatment;
- End-stage (permanent) kidney failure unlikely to recover kidney function according to the attending nephrologist;
- Eligible for a fistula attempt as determined by the local multidisciplinary access team;
- Planning to remain in the current dialysis center/service for at least 6 months;
You may not qualify if:
- Started hemodialysis with a fistula or have a patent fistula already in place or had \>1 unsuccessful attempt; (AUS sites: or previously functioning fistula no longer working);
- Has had a prior arteriovenous graft creation;
- Imminent transplant planned (within 6 months);
- Metastatic malignancy or other condition associated with a life expectancy of less than 6 months, in the opinion of the attending nephrologist;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Calgarylead
- Applied Health Research Centrecollaborator
- The George Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (13)
The Canberra Hospital
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, 2605, Australia
Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District (ISLHD)
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500, Australia
Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service (SCHHS)
Birtinya, Queensland, 4575, Australia
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2R 0X7, Canada
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3, Canada
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6, Canada
St. Joseph's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 7W9, Canada
Humber River Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M3M 0B2, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Related Publications (14)
Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, Ghali WA, Dean S, Johnson D, Donaldson C. Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Sep;40(3):611-22. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34924.
PMID: 12200814BACKGROUNDJindal K, Chan CT, Deziel C, Hirsch D, Soroka SD, Tonelli M, Culleton BF; Canadian Society of Nephrology Committee for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;17(3 Suppl 1):S1-27. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121372. No abstract available.
PMID: 16497879BACKGROUNDRavani P, Palmer SC, Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, MacRae JM, Tai DJ, Pannu NI, Thomas C, Hemmelgarn BR, Craig JC, Manns B, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF, James MT. Associations between hemodialysis access type and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;24(3):465-73. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012070643. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
PMID: 23431075BACKGROUNDQuinn RR, Laupacis A, Hux JE, Oliver MJ, Austin PC. Predicting the risk of 1-year mortality in incident dialysis patients: accounting for case-mix severity in studies using administrative data. Med Care. 2011 Mar;49(3):257-66. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318202aa0b.
PMID: 21301370BACKGROUNDTennankore KK, Soroka SD, Kiberd BA. The impact of an "acute dialysis start" on the mortality attributed to the use of central venous catheters: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2012 Jul 30;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-72.
PMID: 22846341BACKGROUNDMazonakis E, Stirling C, Booth KL, McClenahan J, Heron N, Geddes CC. The influence of comorbidity on the risk of access-related bacteremia in chronic hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2009 Jan;13(1):6-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2009.00327.x.
PMID: 19210271BACKGROUNDLok CE, Allon M, Moist L, Oliver MJ, Shah H, Zimmerman D. Risk equation determining unsuccessful cannulation events and failure to maturation in arteriovenous fistulas (REDUCE FTM I). J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Nov;17(11):3204-12. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030190. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
PMID: 16988062BACKGROUNDQuinn RR, Lamping DL, Lok CE, Meyer RA, Hiller JA, Lee J, Richardson EP, Kiss A, Oliver MJ. The Vascular Access Questionnaire: assessing patient-reported views of vascular access. J Vasc Access. 2008 Apr-Jun;9(2):122-8.
PMID: 18609528BACKGROUNDOliver MJ, Verrelli M, Zacharias JM, Blake PG, Garg AX, Johnson JF, Pandeya S, Perl J, Kiss AJ, Quinn RR. Choosing peritoneal dialysis reduces the risk of invasive access interventions. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Feb;27(2):810-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr289. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
PMID: 21693682BACKGROUNDTordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, Kooman J, Martin-Malo A, Pedrini L, Pizzarelli F, Tattersall J, Vennegoor M, Wanner C, ter Wee P, Vanholder R. EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 May;22 Suppl 2:ii88-117. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm021. No abstract available.
PMID: 17507428BACKGROUNDCasey JR, Hanson CS, Winkelmayer WC, Craig JC, Palmer S, Strippoli GF, Tong A. Patients' perspectives on hemodialysis vascular access: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Dec;64(6):937-53. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
PMID: 25115617BACKGROUNDDetry MA, Lewis RJ. The intention-to-treat principle: how to assess the true effect of choosing a medical treatment. JAMA. 2014 Jul 2;312(1):85-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7523. No abstract available.
PMID: 25058221BACKGROUNDMurea M, James KM, Russell GB, Byrum GV 3rd, Yates JE, Tuttle NS, Bleyer AJ, Burkart JM, Freedman BI. Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in elderly patients on hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Apr;9(4):764-70. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07710713. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
PMID: 24651074BACKGROUNDQuinn R, Ravani P; ACCESS HD Investigators. ACCESS HD pilot: A randomised feasibility trial Comparing Catheters with fistulas in Elderly patientS Starting haemodialysis. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e013081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013081.
PMID: 27884849DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rob Quinn, PhD
University of Calgary
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pietro Ravani, PhD
University of Calgary
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Nephrologist and Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2016
First Posted
February 5, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share