NCT02671552

Brief Summary

This pilot clinical trial compares the imaging results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with kidney cancer undergoing cryosurgery (a procedure in which an extremely cold liquid or an instrument called a cryoprobe is used to freeze and destroy abnormal tissue). Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound that does not involve a dye may help patients avoid side effects from a dye that is usually used in MRI or CT and may help doctors measure blood flow and determine whether the cryosurgery procedure treated the kidney tumor.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 24, 2013

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 4, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 4, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 4, 2016

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 4, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Sensitivity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Specificity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Accuracy will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Positive predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Negative predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

  • Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma

    Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery

Study Arms (1)

Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres IV and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging the morning prior to cryosurgery and at 3-4 months post treatment during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) follow up.

Drug: Perflutren Protein-Type A MicrospheresProcedure: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

Interventions

Given IV

Also known as: Optison, Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres
Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound)

Undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be scheduled for a percutaneous cryoablation of a renal mass
  • Be medically stable
  • If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
  • Have signed informed consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Females who are pregnant or nursing
  • Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:
  • Patients on life support or in a critical care unit
  • Patients with unstable occlusive disease (eg, crescendo angina)
  • Patients with clinically unstable cardiac arrhythmias, such as recurrent ventricular tachycardia
  • Patients with uncontrolled congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class IV)
  • Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
  • Patients with known sensitivities to albumin, blood, or blood products
  • Patients who have undergone surgery within 24 hours prior to the study sonographic examination
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to perflutren
  • Patients who have received any contrast medium (X-ray, MRI, CT, or ultrasound \[US\]) in the 24 hours prior to the research US exam
  • Patients with cardiac shunts
  • Patients with congenital heart defects
  • Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli
  • Patients with respiratory distress syndrome
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Interventions

FS 069

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsKidney NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Flemming Forsberg, PhD

    Thomas Jefferson University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2016

First Posted

February 2, 2016

Study Start

January 24, 2013

Primary Completion

December 4, 2014

Study Completion

December 4, 2014

Last Updated

May 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Locations