Study Stopped
Terminated by the IRB
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Kidney Cancer Undergoing Cryosurgery
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Cryoablation
4 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot clinical trial compares the imaging results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with kidney cancer undergoing cryosurgery (a procedure in which an extremely cold liquid or an instrument called a cryoprobe is used to freeze and destroy abnormal tissue). Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound that does not involve a dye may help patients avoid side effects from a dye that is usually used in MRI or CT and may help doctors measure blood flow and determine whether the cryosurgery procedure treated the kidney tumor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 24, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 4, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 4, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2016
CompletedMay 2, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.9 years
January 4, 2016
May 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Sensitivity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Specificity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Accuracy will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Positive predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Negative predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres IV and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging the morning prior to cryosurgery and at 3-4 months post treatment during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) follow up.
Interventions
Given IV
Undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be scheduled for a percutaneous cryoablation of a renal mass
- Be medically stable
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Have signed informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
- Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:
- Patients on life support or in a critical care unit
- Patients with unstable occlusive disease (eg, crescendo angina)
- Patients with clinically unstable cardiac arrhythmias, such as recurrent ventricular tachycardia
- Patients with uncontrolled congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class IV)
- Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
- Patients with known sensitivities to albumin, blood, or blood products
- Patients who have undergone surgery within 24 hours prior to the study sonographic examination
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to perflutren
- Patients who have received any contrast medium (X-ray, MRI, CT, or ultrasound \[US\]) in the 24 hours prior to the research US exam
- Patients with cardiac shunts
- Patients with congenital heart defects
- Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli
- Patients with respiratory distress syndrome
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Flemming Forsberg, PhD
Thomas Jefferson University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2016
First Posted
February 2, 2016
Study Start
January 24, 2013
Primary Completion
December 4, 2014
Study Completion
December 4, 2014
Last Updated
May 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05