Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation Versus Mechanical Lithotripsy for Large Stones
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with large balloon dilation (LBD) has been increasingly accepted as alternative method for removal of large bile duct stones. However, there were limited studies comparing the efficacy of EST in combined with LBD to EST with mechanical lithotripsy (ML). The purpose of this study to compare the efficacy and safety of combined EST- LBD versus EST-ML in the removal of very large bile duct stones.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedJanuary 29, 2016
January 1, 2016
2.4 years
January 25, 2016
January 28, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete stone clearance rate in the index ERCP
The number of patients who was achieved complete stone clearance in the index ERCP
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Procedure time
24 hours
Complete stone clearance rate in the rescue therapy
24 hours
Complication rate
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Large balloon dilatation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients underwent clearance of common bile duct stones using a papillary large balloon dilatation.
Mechanical lithotripsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients underwent clearance of common bile duct stones using a mechanical lithotripsy.
Interventions
After biliary sphincterotomy was performed with full extension to the full length of transverse fold. A 12, 15, 18 or 20 mm CRE-balloon was passed over guide wire and position across the papilla. The balloon was gradually inflated to the largest size of the bile duct stone and/or the bile duct diameter. When complete stone removal was unsuccessful , crossing over treatment was considered at the discretion of the endoscopists.
After biliary sphincterotomy was performed with full extension to the full length of transverse fold. A 3x6 cm Trapezoid Rx retrieval stone basket was used to capture the stone and crushing of stones was done when simple stone extraction failed to remove the stone. The stone fragments were then retrieved with a basket and/ or a retrieval balloon. When complete stone removal was unsuccessful , crossing over treatment was considered at the discretion of the endoscopists.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent was obtained in every patients prior to the procedure
- Patients were randomized to LBD or ML if they had CBD stone \>/= 15 mm in shortest dimension or stone' size was disproportionate to the lower bile duct segment with a ratio of largest stone dimension/lower bile duct segment diameter \> 50 % identified by a cholangiogram at ERCP.
You may not qualify if:
- uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR \>1.5 ), thrombocytopenia( platelet count \< 50,000)
- concomitant intrahepatic duct stones
- ongoing acute pancreatitis or acute cholecystitis
- surgically altered anatomy (i.e. Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction)
- concomitant pancreatic or biliary malignancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NKC Institue of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bancha Ovartlarnporn, MD.
NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand, 90110.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2016
First Posted
January 28, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual data of patients participating in the study are not available for public sharing since we did not obtain the consent to share the data of patient