The Esteem® Hearing Implant Post Approval Study
To Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of the Esteem® Hearing Implant in Subjects Suffering From Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss
1 other identifier
observational
51
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Esteem® Hearing Implant in subjects suffering from moderate to severe hearing loss.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 4, 2016
CompletedMay 4, 2016
January 1, 2016
4 years
July 8, 2011
January 29, 2016
March 31, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline (Pre-implant Aided Condition) at Year 5 in Speech Reception Threshold (SRT)
ENDPOINT #1: SRT at baseline minus SRT at Year 5. Positive difference (i.e. lower value of SRT with the Esteem) indicates better outcome.
Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up
Change From Baseline (Pre-implant Aided Condition) at Year 5 in Word Recognition Score (WRS) at 50 dB HL
ENDPOINT #2: WRS at Year 5 minus WRS at baseline. Positive difference (in % correct) indicates better outcome.
Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up
Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Events (SADEs) and Device Failures and Replacements at Each Follow-up.
ENDPOINT #3: The analysis of the incidence of SADEs and device failures and replacements at each follow-up.
SADEs, PAS phase through Year 5 of Follow Up
Bone Conduction Stability
ENDPOINT #5: Difference between Baseline and 5 Year Pure-Tone Average (PTA; average of 500, 1000, 2000 Hz thresholds); calculated as PTA at Year 5 minus PTA at baseline. Smaller magnitude dB difference indicates better outcome.
Baseline through 5 Year Follow-Up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in Quality of Life as Reflected by Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaire
Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up
Interventions
The Esteem® Hearing Implant is designed to improve hearing in subjects suffering from moderate to severe hearing loss that is sensorineural in origin. The Esteem® has been approved by FDA for the US market under Pre-Market Approval P090018 and this study fulfills the requirement for one of the Post Approval Studies.
Eligibility Criteria
Persons suffering from moderate to severe hearing loss that is sensorineural in origin
You may qualify if:
- Subject must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for treatment in the trial:
- Subject is at least 18 years old
- Subject understands the nature of the procedure and has signed the Subject Informed Consent Form prior to the procedure
- Subject is willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and understands the audiological test procedures and use of the Esteem® System.
- Subject has moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss between 500 and 4000 Hz in the ear to be implanted with pure tone air-conduction threshold levels within the limits of a Hearing Aid (HA) as follow:
- Freq (Hz) 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 Lower Level (dB HL) 30 35 35 35 35 Upper Level (dB HL) 100 100 100 100 100
- Subject's air-bone gap is no greater than 10 dB at 4 of the 5 following frequencies: 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz.
- Subject has an unaided maximum word recognition score of greater than or equal to 40% with recorded delivery using a phonetically balanced word list at Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) + 40 dB or at maximum tolerable presentation level.
- Subject is a current user of a properly functioning and appropriately fit hearing aid. This is defined as the subject has used this aid for at least four (4) hours (average) per day (in the ear to be implanted) for at least three (3) months for a new aid or one (1) month for an adjusted aid.
- Subject's hearing aid, in the ear to be implanted, shall appropriately fit optimally.
- Subject has normally functioning eustachian tube
- Subject has normal tympanic membrane
- Subject has a normal middle ear anatomy
- Subject has adequate space for Esteem® System implant determined via fine cut temporal bone CT scan
- Subject is a native speaker of the English language.
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects will be excluded from the trial if any one of the following criteria is met:
- Subject has a history of post-adolescent chronic middle ear infections, inner ear disorders or recurring vertigo requiring treatment, disorders such as mastoiditis, Hydrops or Meniere's syndrome or disease
- Subject has a history of external otitis or eczema for the outer ear canal and the investigator believes this will affect the Esteem® System implantation
- Subject has cholesteatoma or destructive middle ear disease
- Subject has life expectancy of less than two (2) years due to other medical conditions
- Subject has retrocochlear or central auditory disorders
- Subject is known to be suffering from any psychological, developmental, physical, or emotional disorder that the investigator feels would interfere with the surgery or follow-up testing
- Subject has a known history of fluctuating air conduction and/or bone conduction hearing loss over a one-year period of 15 dB in either direction at 2 or more frequencies (from 500 - 4000 Hz)
- Subject has sudden hearing loss due to unknown cause
- Subject has a history of disabling tinnitus, defined as tinnitus which required treatment.
- Subject is unable to adequately perform audiological testing
- Subject has a medical condition or undergoing a treatment that may affect healing and the investigator does not believe the subject is a good candidate for the trial.
- Subject has diabetes that is not well controlled with medication or diet and the investigator does not believe in his best medical judgment that the subject would be a good candidate for the trial
- Subject is pregnant at the time of device implant
- Subject has a history of keloid formation
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Newport Beach, California, 92658, United States
Shohet Ear Associates
Newport Beach, California, 92663, United States
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
Surgical Care Affiliates
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401, United States
The Ear Center of Greensboro
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. Study endpoints do not account for natural progression of hearing loss over 5-year follow-up. 2. Fitting methods for pre-implant hearing aid were not strictly controlled in the protocol.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Elizabeth Anderson, PhD
- Organization
- Envoy Medical Corp.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jack A Shohet, MD
Hoag Memorial Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth H Toh, MBBS; MD
Lahey Clinic Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric M Kraus, MD, MS, FACS
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2011
First Posted
January 28, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 4, 2016
Results First Posted
May 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share