Performing a Low-dose, Whole-body Angiography as the First Element of an Imaging Assessment Following Stroke / TIA
VASCU
The Impact of Performing a Low-dose, Whole-body Angiography as the First Element of an Imaging Assessment Following Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in Comparison With Usual Care: a Randomized, Controlled, Open Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
260
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare two post-stroke/TIA (transient ischemic attack) imaging strategies in terms of the number of clinically important (i.e. requiring specific treatment according to current recommendations) lesions detected. The first strategy is the current/usual strategy in each participating centre and the second strategy consists in starting the post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment by a whole-body, low-dose angiography and subsequently resorting to elements of the usual strategy if required.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 12, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 12, 2026
March 10, 2025
March 1, 2025
6.6 years
November 17, 2015
March 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence/absence of at least one element requiring specific treatment
This is a binary variable: the units are "presence/absence". Presence/absence of at least one element (found during the patient's pathway in the imaging service) requiring specific treatment from among the following: * Anomaly indicating a high risk for cardio-vascular embolism * Anomaly indicating a high risk for vascular thrombosis * Any other lesions requiring specific treatment
Day 30
Secondary Outcomes (32)
Diagnostic delay (h)
between day 1 and hospital discharge (expected maximum of two weeks)
Length of hospital stay (h)
hospital discharge (expected maximum of two weeks)
Patient pathway: the number of imaging exams required
Month 1
Patient pathway: the types of imaging exams required
Month 1
Total irradiation (mSv) during patient pathway
Month 1
- +27 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Routine Imaging
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to this arm will have routine post-stroke/TIA imaging assessments. Intervention: Routine Imaging Assessment
LDWBA first
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to this arm will start their post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment by a low-dose, whole-body angiography (LDWBA). The latter can be followed by routine imaging assessments if required. Intervention: LDWBA first followed by Routine Imaging Assessment if required.
Interventions
Patients will have the usual post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment according to routine procedures in each participating center. The latter most often begin with an angiography of the supra-aortic trunks but may also include a range of other imaging exams depending on the patient's condition. "Routine Imaging Assessment" refers to an imaging strategy and not a specific device. The devices used depend on what is available in participating centres and the routine choices made by those centers.
Patients randomized to this arm will start their post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment by a low-dose, whole-body angiography (LDWBA). The latter can be followed by routine imaging assessments if required. LDWBA: This is a low dose scanner protocol comprising a CT acquisition and an iodine contrast medium injection. The acquisition includes a propeller during the arterial phase of the contrast agent injection in the cervical and thoracic levels with cardiac gaiting (ECG gating to reduce cardiac motion artifacts), continuing with pelvic abdominal arterial acquisition. The second propeller is made on the abdomen and pelvis at the portal time of injection. The reconstruction will be carried out in pulmonary, mediastinal and bone windows. The dose will be calculated for each patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient was informed about the implementation of the study, its objectives, constraints and patient rights
- The patient has given free and informed consent and signed the consent
- Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- Patient available for 36 months of follow-up
- The patient has had a stroke (within the past 10 days, diagnosis confirmed by MRI with a diffusion sequence) or transient ischemic attack (within the past 10 days, ABCD2 score greater than 3) without haemorrhage
You may not qualify if:
- Patient under guardianship or judicial protection
- Refusal to sign the consent
- Inability to correctly inform the patient or his/her trusted person about the study
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
- The patient has a contraindication for a treatment used in this study
- Known allergy to contrast medium or severe allergy to iodine
- Known active malignancy or history of cancer treatment
- The patient has already undergone a full body scanner in the previous three months
- Renal failure with creatinine clearance below 60 ml / min
- Monoclonal immunoglobulin
- History of severe symptomatic cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, mesenteric ischemia, renal ischemia)
- Emergency situations that hamper the planned course of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier, 34295, France
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Francesco Macri, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2015
First Posted
January 26, 2016
Study Start
October 21, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 12, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 12, 2026
Last Updated
March 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03