NCT02662751

Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to compare two post-stroke/TIA (transient ischemic attack) imaging strategies in terms of the number of clinically important (i.e. requiring specific treatment according to current recommendations) lesions detected. The first strategy is the current/usual strategy in each participating centre and the second strategy consists in starting the post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment by a whole-body, low-dose angiography and subsequently resorting to elements of the usual strategy if required.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
260

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
1mo left

Started Oct 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress99%
Oct 2019Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 17, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2016

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2019

Completed
6.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 12, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 12, 2026

Last Updated

March 10, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.6 years

First QC Date

November 17, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Presence/absence of at least one element requiring specific treatment

    This is a binary variable: the units are "presence/absence". Presence/absence of at least one element (found during the patient's pathway in the imaging service) requiring specific treatment from among the following: * Anomaly indicating a high risk for cardio-vascular embolism * Anomaly indicating a high risk for vascular thrombosis * Any other lesions requiring specific treatment

    Day 30

Secondary Outcomes (32)

  • Diagnostic delay (h)

    between day 1 and hospital discharge (expected maximum of two weeks)

  • Length of hospital stay (h)

    hospital discharge (expected maximum of two weeks)

  • Patient pathway: the number of imaging exams required

    Month 1

  • Patient pathway: the types of imaging exams required

    Month 1

  • Total irradiation (mSv) during patient pathway

    Month 1

  • +27 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Routine Imaging

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized to this arm will have routine post-stroke/TIA imaging assessments. Intervention: Routine Imaging Assessment

Other: Routine Imaging Assessment

LDWBA first

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to this arm will start their post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment by a low-dose, whole-body angiography (LDWBA). The latter can be followed by routine imaging assessments if required. Intervention: LDWBA first followed by Routine Imaging Assessment if required.

Other: Routine Imaging AssessmentDevice: LDWBA first (CT scan)

Interventions

Patients will have the usual post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment according to routine procedures in each participating center. The latter most often begin with an angiography of the supra-aortic trunks but may also include a range of other imaging exams depending on the patient's condition. "Routine Imaging Assessment" refers to an imaging strategy and not a specific device. The devices used depend on what is available in participating centres and the routine choices made by those centers.

LDWBA firstRoutine Imaging

Patients randomized to this arm will start their post-stroke/TIA imaging assessment by a low-dose, whole-body angiography (LDWBA). The latter can be followed by routine imaging assessments if required. LDWBA: This is a low dose scanner protocol comprising a CT acquisition and an iodine contrast medium injection. The acquisition includes a propeller during the arterial phase of the contrast agent injection in the cervical and thoracic levels with cardiac gaiting (ECG gating to reduce cardiac motion artifacts), continuing with pelvic abdominal arterial acquisition. The second propeller is made on the abdomen and pelvis at the portal time of injection. The reconstruction will be carried out in pulmonary, mediastinal and bone windows. The dose will be calculated for each patient.

LDWBA first

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient was informed about the implementation of the study, its objectives, constraints and patient rights
  • The patient has given free and informed consent and signed the consent
  • Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • Patient available for 36 months of follow-up
  • The patient has had a stroke (within the past 10 days, diagnosis confirmed by MRI with a diffusion sequence) or transient ischemic attack (within the past 10 days, ABCD2 score greater than 3) without haemorrhage

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient under guardianship or judicial protection
  • Refusal to sign the consent
  • Inability to correctly inform the patient or his/her trusted person about the study
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • The patient has a contraindication for a treatment used in this study
  • Known allergy to contrast medium or severe allergy to iodine
  • Known active malignancy or history of cancer treatment
  • The patient has already undergone a full body scanner in the previous three months
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance below 60 ml / min
  • Monoclonal immunoglobulin
  • History of severe symptomatic cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, mesenteric ischemia, renal ischemia)
  • Emergency situations that hamper the planned course of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Gui de Chauliac

Montpellier, 34295, France

RECRUITING

CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Nîmes, 30029, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeIschemic Attack, Transient

Interventions

Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesBrain Ischemia

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Study Officials

  • Francesco Macri, MD

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2015

First Posted

January 26, 2016

Study Start

October 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 12, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 12, 2026

Last Updated

March 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations