Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on The Pharyngeal Swallow in Neonates
1 other identifier
interventional
7
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Oral feeding of neonates while on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a common practice in many neonatal intensive care units (NICU) all over the country. However the safety of such practice has never been established. The Investigators hypothesize that mechanoreceptors, which should perceive sensory input from the liquid bolus, may be altered by the reception of pressurized airflow provided by the NCPAP, hence increase risk of aspiration. In this study, changes in the pharyngeal phase of swallowing were identified using video fluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) for infants while on NCPAP as compared to off NCPAP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2019
CompletedSeptember 25, 2019
September 1, 2019
1.2 years
January 4, 2016
January 25, 2018
September 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pharyngeal Phase Dysphagia
presence of atypical or disordered movements during the pharyngeal phase of swallowing
<5 seconds post swallow trigger
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Tracheal Aspiration
<5 seconds post swallow trigger
Percentage of Laryngeal Length
<2 seconds post swallow trigger
Silent Aspiration
<5 seconds post swallow trigger
Nasopharyngeal Reflux
<2 seconds post swallow trigger
Pharyngeal Residue
<5 seconds post swallow trigger
Study Arms (2)
on NCPAP
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnce consented, each participant underwent a video fluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) while NCPAP was administered via a RAM cannula® (intervention). With the NCPAP turned on each participant was fed room temperature thin liquid barium (Varibar® Thin Liquid Barium Sulfate for Suspension) from a standard bottle (60ml Similac® Volu-Feeder® with an attached Similac® Infant Nipple and Ring (standard flow), a total of 20 swallows were recorded. These swallows were termed "on NCPAP" swallows. The swallows were assessed in real time for any swallowing dysfunction.
Off NCPAP
ACTIVE COMPARATORImmediately following the "on NCPAP" condition, an additional 20 swallows were recorded under VFSS with the NCPAP turned off (intervention). These swallows were termed "off NCPAP" swallows.
Interventions
Does NCPAP induce dysphagia in neonates? Each baby will be evaluated for dysphagia (using fluoroscopy) while on NCPAP and off NCPAP.
Liquid barium is used as a contrast material to allow visualization of swallowed boluses under fluoroscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants in neonatal ICU requiring NCPAP and tolerating at least 50% of their total required intake by mouth from a bottle, as determined by their medical team.
You may not qualify if:
- Infants with other comorbidity such as upper airway anomalies, brain injury neuromuscular disease, life threatening congenital disease. Any symptomatic intercurrent acute disease e.g. infectious disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small number of subjects: Enrollment was stopped after 7 participants due to the documented risks associated with oral feeding on NCPAP. It was unethical to expose infants to harm after clear safety risk was identified.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nazeeh Hanna, MD
- Organization
- NYU-Winthrop Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nazeeh Hanna, MD
NYU Langone Winthrop University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2016
First Posted
January 22, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 25, 2019
Results First Posted
July 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09