HyaloFAST Trial for Repair of Articular Cartilage in the Knee
FastTRACK
A Prospective, Randomized, Active Treatment-controlled, Evaluator-blinded Multicenter Study to Establish the Superiority of Hyalofast® With BMAC in the Treatment of Articular Knee Cartilage Defect Lesions in Comparison to Control
1 other identifier
interventional
200
9 countries
48
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Hyalofast® scaffold with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) compared to microfracture in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
48 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
ExpectedApril 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
9.3 years
January 14, 2016
April 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Superiority of Hyalofast with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs. Microfracture for % Change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Score
Co-primary endpoint
2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) vs. Microfracture for % Change in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Score
Co-Primary Endpoint
2 years post-surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture for change in MRI MOCART Score from baseline to two years post-surgery
2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture for change in Evaluator Global Assessment from baseline to two years post-surgery
2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture in change in individual KOOS subscales from baseline to two years post-surgery
2 years post-surgery
Superiority of Hyalofast® with autologous BMAC vs. Microfracture in change in IKDC Knee Examination Form domains from baseline to two years post-surgery
2 years post-surgery
The incidence, timing, severity, and relationship to treatment of all Adverse Events (AE), will be collected for all participants.
3 years post-surgery
Study Arms (2)
Hyalofast with BMAC
EXPERIMENTALA hyaluronan-based scaffold (Hyalofast®) is utilized together with autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in a one-step arthroscopic/mini-arthrotomic procedure.
Microfracture
ACTIVE COMPARATORMicrofracture is an arthroscopic surgical technique involving placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect to provide stem cells and growth factors from the bone marrow to aid cartilage repair.
Interventions
Microfracture is a well-established arthroscopic surgical technique for cartilage repair which involves several systematic steps, including debridement to a stable cartilage margin, careful removal of the calcified cartilage layer, and homogeneous placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect, with resultant complete defect fill by a well-anchored clot
Implantation of Hyalofast scaffold with autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate via arthroscopy/mini-arthrotomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is male or female, between 18 and 60 years of age
- Patient's body mass index (BMI) is \<35 kg/m2
- Patient has a symptomatic lesion of the femoral condyle (medial and/or lateral) or femoral trochlea that is between 1.5 - 6 cm2 on screening images confirmed by the independent radiologist
- The symptomatic lesion is classified as International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 or 4
- Patient agrees to actively participate in a strict rehabilitation protocol and follow-up program
- Patient is using only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen/paracetamol during the month before signing the informed consent form to treat knee pain
- Patient is willing and able to provide informed consent and comply with study requirements
- Patient, if woman of childbearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening, cannot be lactating and is willing to use adequate contraception for the first 12 months of the study after the last surgery
- Patient has ability to consistently rate knee pain and function as demonstrated by completion of total KOOS score
- Patient has a minimum of 45 out of 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for index knee pain when remembering index knee pain when not on medication and when active
- Patient is willing to use other pain medication rather than Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDS) for 6 months post-surgery (e.g. acetaminophen, or narcotic analgesics, if prescribed). Post-surgical use of aspirin for clot prevention is acceptable.
- Patient is willing to restrict pain medication after 6 months post-surgery to NSAIDs or acetaminophen/paracetamol only through the end of the trial
- Patient must have Hematocrit ≥ 28.0%; White Blood Cell count ≤ 14,000; Platelet Count ≥ 50,000; Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL; and International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤ 1.6
You may not qualify if:
- Major concomitant cartilage lesions which require extensive surgical treatment. (Lesions such as minor loose bodies, small debris fragments, small cartilage fragments or prominent knee fat pad are allowed. These lesions may be treated with debridement).
- Presence of a kissing bipolar lesion that is apposed to the index lesion and is deeper than Grade 2 (ICRS classification) as determined by MRI. (Presence of a kissing (bipolar) lesion that is apposed to the index lesion and is deeper than Grade 2 and is discovered under arthroscopy are allowed). The non-index lesion, if indicated for treatment, should be treated with the study assigned treatment of the index lesion.
- Diagnosed advanced osteoarthritis as demonstrated by a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 3 or 4 in the index knee
- Complex ligamentous instability of the index or contralateral knee. (Previous reconstructions of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) or Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) are allowed, of either the index or contralateral knee, if instability is not present. Grade 1 ligamentous injury are allowed)
- Infections or skin diseases at target knee joint
- Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD)
- Patients requiring meniscal arrow or meniscal sutures
- Previous meniscal transplant in the index knee
- Patients with previous total or functional meniscectomy. (Patients with a previous partial meniscectomy and a meniscus that is considered biomechanically functional are allowed)
- Varus or valgus malalignment exceeding 10° in either knee
- Patient requiring concomitant surgical procedures at the time of Index Procedure such as osteotomies (e.g. high tibial valgus and/or patellar realignment osteotomy), bone subchondral perforation, ligament surgery, meniscal surgeries etc.
- Previous cartilage repair procedure (microfracture, Osteochondral autograft transplantation system (OATS) or Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) with or without use of a scaffold (matrix) in the index knee
- Previous failed microfracture procedure in index knee. (Previous history of microfracture in the contralateral knee is allowed)
- Known hypersensitivity (allergy) to hyaluronate
- Contraindication(s) to microfracture surgery
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (48)
Physicians Research Group
Tempe, Arizona, 85284, United States
Axis Clinical Trials
Los Angeles, California, 90036, United States
Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic
Los Angeles, California, 90045, United States
BioSolutions Clinical Research Center
San Diego, California, 91942, United States
New Hope Research Development
Tarzana, California, 91356, United States
Orthopedic Foundation
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905, United States
Paramount Trials, LLC
Miami, Florida, 33016, United States
Suncoast Clinical Research
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652, United States
OrthoIllinois
Rockford, Illinois, 61107, United States
Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808, United States
Covington Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Institute
Covington, Louisiana, 70433, United States
Clinical Research Center of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 11355, United States
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43221, United States
Penn Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Austin Ortho Biologics / Seton Medical Center Austin
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Baylor Scott & White
Temple, Texas, 76508, United States
Epic Medical Research
Murray, Utah, 84123, United States
University Hospital Tulln
Tulln, Lower Austria, 3430, Austria
Kepler University Clinic
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021, Austria
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern
Ried, Upper Austria, 4910, Austria
Medical University of Graz
Graz, Austria
Universtitatsklinkik Krems
Krems, 3500, Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Evangelisches Krankenhaus
Vienna, 1180, Austria
Private Hospital Doebling
Vienna, 1190, Austria
Ortopeedia Arstid AS
Tallinn, 10138, Estonia
North Estonia Medical Center
Tallinn, 13419, Estonia
Health Center of Downtown-Lipotvaros, Orthopedic Outpatient Clinic (Belvárosi-Lipótvárosi Egészségügyi Szolgálat Ortopeadia)
Budapest, 1051, Hungary
Semmelweis Egyetem Orthopaedic Clinic (Ortopédiai Klinika)
Budapest, 1113, Hungary
Uzsoki Hospital, Department of Traumatology
Budapest, 1145, Hungary
Jutrix Medical Llc
Budapest, 6000, Hungary
Menta Egeszsegkozpont Kft.
Budapest, H-1115, Hungary
Magyar Honvedseg, Egeszseugyi Kozpont, Balesteti Sebeszeti Osztaly
Budapest, Hungary
DE KK Ortopediai Klinika
Debrecen, Hungary
Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Oktatókórház
Kaposvár, Hungary
Kastelypark Klinka
Tata, Hungary
Medistra Hospital
Jakarta, Indonesia
Royal Progess Hospital
Jakarta, Indonesia
Instituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, Italy
A.O. Universitaria San Martino Monoblocco
Genova, 16132, Italy
University Federico II
Naples, 80131, Italy
AB "Ortopedijos technika"
Kaunas, LT-49476, Lithuania
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros klinikos
Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
Desarrollo Ético en Investigación Clínica S.C.
Guadalajara, CP 44500, Mexico
Cruz Roja Mexicana (Hospital de Ortopedia de la Cruz Roja Mexicana)
Mérida, CP 97166, Mexico
Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González
Monterrey, Mexico
De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute
Cavite, Philippines
Related Publications (1)
Shah SS, Lee S, Mithoefer K. Next-Generation Marrow Stimulation Technology for Cartilage Repair: Basic Science to Clinical Application. JBJS Rev. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):e20.00090. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00090.
PMID: 33512974DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alberto Gobbi, MD
OASI Bioresearch Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2016
First Posted
January 20, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 20, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share