Ketamine- Propofol Versus Pethidine- Propofol in ERCP
Ketamine-propofol Versus Pethidine-propofol for Sedating Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aim to investigate the differences between ketamine propofol and pethidine propofol during ERCP in respect to endoscopist satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedApril 29, 2016
April 1, 2016
1.2 years
November 29, 2015
April 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
endoscopist satisfaction using 5 step scale (5= optimal condition; 1= poor condition)
Immediately after procedure.
Other Outcomes (1)
amount of propofol consumed during procedure
Immediately after procedure.
Study Arms (2)
ketamine- propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORIV Ketamine 1mg/kg + Propofol 1.2 mg/kg will be given for sedation.
pethidine- propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1.1 mg x kg(-1) pethidine + 1.2 mg x kg(-1) propofol for sedation induction
Interventions
1 mg x kg(-1) ketamine + 1.2 mg x kg(-1) propofol.
1.1 mg x kg(-1) pethidine + 1.2 mg x kg(-1) propofol for sedation induction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- both gender
- age between 18-70
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant patients.
- morbid obesity.
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- complicated airway.
- American society of anesthesia (ASA) physical classification IV-V.
- history of allergy or contraindications to the drugs used in the study
- emergency need for ERCP.
- those whose informed consent could not be signed.
- those with possible complex ERCP.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al Rajhy liver hospital
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mostafa S Abbas, MD
Assiut University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of anaesthesia and ICU
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2015
First Posted
January 11, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04