NCT02649543

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to compare infection rates between primary, delayed primary and vacuum assisted closures in contaminated and dirty/infected laparotomy wounds.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2012

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 7, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

November 25, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Surgical Wound InfectionNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyWound Closure TechniquesLaparotomy.Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of Surgical Wound Infection with each Wound Closure Technique

    Presence of infection was determined by a certified board physician according to CDC's Criteria for Defining a Surgical Site Infection.

    Two months

Study Arms (3)

Primary Closure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Primary Closure is made after surgery.

Procedure: Primary Closure

Delayed Primary Closure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Delayed Primary Closure is made after at least 7 days.

Procedure: Delayed Primary Closure

Vacuum Assisted Closure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vacuum Assisted Device is used in the wound.

Procedure: Vacuum Assisted Closure

Interventions

A double antibiotic scheme with a cephalosporin and metronidazole is used as prophylaxis, and the fascia was closed with a continuous Polyglycolic Acid 0 suture. Subcutaneous tissue was approximated with Polyglycolic Acid 3-0, and the skin is sutured using Polypropylene 2-0.

Primary Closure

A double antibiotic scheme with a cephalosporin and metronidazole is used as prophylaxis, and the fascia is closed with a continuous Polyglycolic Acid 0 suture. The VAC® system is then used, with change of dressings every 48 hrs. The wound is closed using Polypropylene 2-0 only after healthy granulation tissue and no signs of infection are present.

Vacuum Assisted Closure

A double antibiotic scheme with a cephalosporin and metronidazole is used as prophylaxis, and the fascia was closed with a continuous Polyglycolic Acid 0 suture. The wound is left open for at least 7 days, after which closure with Polypropylene 2-0 takes place if considered suitable by a board certified surgeon.

Delayed Primary Closure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Laparotomy wound classified as class III or IV according to CDC's Criteria for Defining a Surgical Site Infection.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal to participate in the trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Escuela Nacional de Medicina, Tecnologico de Monterrey

Monterrey, Nuevo León, 76140, Mexico

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Surgical Wound Infection

Interventions

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wound InfectionInfectionsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DrainageTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, OperativeWound Closure Techniques

Study Officials

  • Gerardo Lozano Balderas, MD

    Escuela Nacional de Medicina, Tecnologico de Monterrey

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associated investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2015

First Posted

January 7, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

January 7, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-01

Locations