Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary, Delayed Primary and Vacuum Assisted Closures.
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to compare infection rates between primary, delayed primary and vacuum assisted closures in contaminated and dirty/infected laparotomy wounds.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2016
CompletedJanuary 7, 2016
January 1, 2016
11 months
November 25, 2015
January 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Surgical Wound Infection with each Wound Closure Technique
Presence of infection was determined by a certified board physician according to CDC's Criteria for Defining a Surgical Site Infection.
Two months
Study Arms (3)
Primary Closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrimary Closure is made after surgery.
Delayed Primary Closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORDelayed Primary Closure is made after at least 7 days.
Vacuum Assisted Closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORVacuum Assisted Device is used in the wound.
Interventions
A double antibiotic scheme with a cephalosporin and metronidazole is used as prophylaxis, and the fascia was closed with a continuous Polyglycolic Acid 0 suture. Subcutaneous tissue was approximated with Polyglycolic Acid 3-0, and the skin is sutured using Polypropylene 2-0.
A double antibiotic scheme with a cephalosporin and metronidazole is used as prophylaxis, and the fascia is closed with a continuous Polyglycolic Acid 0 suture. The VAC® system is then used, with change of dressings every 48 hrs. The wound is closed using Polypropylene 2-0 only after healthy granulation tissue and no signs of infection are present.
A double antibiotic scheme with a cephalosporin and metronidazole is used as prophylaxis, and the fascia was closed with a continuous Polyglycolic Acid 0 suture. The wound is left open for at least 7 days, after which closure with Polypropylene 2-0 takes place if considered suitable by a board certified surgeon.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Laparotomy wound classified as class III or IV according to CDC's Criteria for Defining a Surgical Site Infection.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal to participate in the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Escuela Nacional de Medicina, Tecnologico de Monterrey
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 76140, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gerardo Lozano Balderas, MD
Escuela Nacional de Medicina, Tecnologico de Monterrey
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associated investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2015
First Posted
January 7, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01