Safety and Efficacy of Remote Programming of Nucleus Cochlear Implants
TEL
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Nucleus cochlear implant programming via telecommunication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 17, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 10, 2020
CompletedNovember 24, 2020
November 1, 2020
1.4 years
December 28, 2015
October 18, 2020
November 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Speech Perception on Monosyllabic Word Test, CNC Words
Subjects will listen to and repeat monosyllabic words from the Consonant Nucleus Consonant word test measured by percentage of words correct to examine their speech perception abilities after each remote programming session.
2-4 weeks post remote programming session
Study Arms (1)
Remote Programming Group
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will undergo remote programming of Nucleus cochlear implants via Custom Sound software using an online interactive meeting platform. The intervention is the programming of the cochlear implant, the experimental aspect is the remote delivery method.
Interventions
Custom Sound is the programming software used to program Nucleus cochlear implants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals aged greater than 12 years that are native English speakers and are capable of completing the study evaluation as deemed by their primary audiologist
- Unilateral or bilateral cochlear implant recipients of a CI24RE, CI422 or CI500 series implant who are in possession of a backup sound processor
- A minimum of 12 months' experience with a CP800 or CP900 series sound processor, and current MAP programmed within 12 months prior to Visit 1
- Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol
- Able to demonstrate protocol competence as confirmed by primary audiologist
You may not qualify if:
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations of remote service delivery
- Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements
- Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations
- Inability to demonstrate basic technological skills for simple computer-based tasks and device connecting after training by primary audiologist
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cochlearlead
Study Sites (4)
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27713, United States
The Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (4)
Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014.
PMID: 15035561BACKGROUNDPETERSON GE, LEHISTE I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62. No abstract available.
PMID: 14485785BACKGROUNDWesarg T, Wasowski A, Skarzynski H, Ramos A, Falcon Gonzalez JC, Kyriafinis G, Junge F, Novakovich A, Mauch H, Laszig R. Remote fitting in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;130(12):1379-88. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.492480. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PMID: 20586675BACKGROUNDMcElveen JT Jr, Blackburn EL, Green JD Jr, McLear PW, Thimsen DJ, Wilson BS. Remote programming of cochlear implants: a telecommunications model. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1035-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d35d87.
PMID: 20147864BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cochlear Clinical Studies
- Organization
- Cochlear
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2015
First Posted
December 31, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 17, 2017
Study Completion
May 17, 2017
Last Updated
November 24, 2020
Results First Posted
November 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11