Early Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures
Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis
1 other identifier
interventional
74
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Whether radical debridement is necessary for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis is still questionable. The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of radical debridement versus no debridement under different surgical procedures for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2015
CompletedDecember 23, 2015
December 1, 2015
5.1 years
December 9, 2015
December 18, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The operative time in minutes
5 years
blood loss in milliliter
5 years
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in mm/h
5 years
kyphotic angle in degree
5 years
Study Arms (1)
spine surgery
OTHERThe objective was to compare the outcomes of radical debridement versus no debridement under different surgical procedures for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.
Interventions
It is a spinal surgery performed with isolated posterior instrumentation without debridement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Frankel grading was grade D and E
- Severe back pain
- Abscess combined with high pressure symptoms
- Larger sequestrum formation or sinus
- Significant spinal instability.
You may not qualify if:
- Frankel grading was grade A,B and C
- Conservative treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2015
First Posted
December 23, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12