Effectiveness and Safety Study of Fixed Versus Flexible of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol
GnRH
A RCT Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Fixed Day-5 Antagonist Protocol Versus the Flexible Antagonist Protocol for the Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Chinese Women With Predicted High Ovarian Response
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of study is to compare the effectiveness of the Day-5 fixed administration of GnRH antagonist versus flexible administration of GnRH antagonist during ovarian stimulation in Chinese women with predicted high ovarian response, and the hypotheses is that the number of oocyte retrieved in fixed protocol is not inferior to GnRH antagonist flexible protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 21, 2015
December 1, 2015
11 months
December 11, 2015
December 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the number of oocytes retrieved
3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Total dosage of Gn and GnRH antagonist
3 weeks
The incidence of premature LH surge during the stimulation
3 weeks
The incidence of OHSS during the study
5 weeks
The implantation rate
5 weeks
clinical pregnancy rate
6 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fixed Protocol
OTHERPatients will start Follitropin beta stimulation on menstrual cycle day 3 and the daily dose will be fixed for the first 5 days of stimulation, a modification of the rFSH dose will be allowed from stimulation day 6 onward. Ganirelix will start fixedly on stimulation Day 5. rhCG will be administered to induce final oocyte maturation as soon as at least three follicles of ≥17 mm were observed, and triptorelin trigger will be used as a replacement in case of OHSS high risk
Flexible protocol
OTHERPatients will start Follitropin beta stimulation on menstrual cycle day 3 and the daily dose will be fixed for the first 5 days of stimulation, a modification of the rFSH dose will be allowed from stimulation day 6 onward. Ganirelix will start flexibly by the promissory criterion in the flexible group. rhCG will be administered to induce final oocyte maturation as soon as at least three follicles of ≥17 mm were observed, and triptorelin trigger will be used as a replacement in case of OHSS high risk
Interventions
Patients will start stimulation with a daily s.c. injection of 150IU follitropin beta on menstrual cycle day 3. A modification of the rFSH dose will be allowed from stimulation day 6 onward in case that a high ovarian response occurs at the discretion of the investigator.
Ganirelix 0.25mg daily s.c. will start after 4 days of rFSH stimulation
An amount of 250ug rhCG will be administered to induce final oocyte maturation as soon as at least three follicles of ≥17 mm were observed
0.2mg triptorelin will replace rHCG to trigger in case of high risk of overstimulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have an indication for COS and IVF/ICSI;
- be \<35 years old;
- have a BMI of 18-25kg/m2;
- have a regular menstruation with a range of 24-35 days;
- fulfill one of these three criteria as follow:
- the number of oocytes retrieved\>15 in previous COS cycle;
- Serum AMH (examined on the menstrual cycle day 2)\>3.52ng/ml;
- antral follicle count (AFC) (examined by ultrasonic on the menstrual cycle day 2)\>16
- have willingness to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of unilateral ovary absence;
- Any difficulty on oocyte pick-up with abnormal condition of ovary and pelvic cavity;
- Women have any clinically relevant pathology could impair embryo implantation or pregnancy continuation (uterine malformation, intermural uterine fibroids\>3cm, intrauterine adhesion,etc);
- Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) diagnosed by Rotterdam consensus criterion(Rotterdam, 2004)
- Other known abnormal ovulation disorders (including but not limited to adrenal gland disease, thyroid disease and hyperprolactinemia);
- A history of recurrent miscarriage or previous IVF cycles failure\>2;
- A history of ovarian hypo-response in previous ovarian stimulation;
- Women with other clinical/socio-economic factors precluding the completion of the study at the discretion of the investigator.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Humaidan P, Quartarolo J, Papanikolaou EG. Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.028. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
PMID: 20416867BACKGROUNDAl-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Aboulghar M, Broekmans F, Sterrenburg M, Smit J, Abou-Setta AM. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11;(5):CD001750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub3.
PMID: 21563131BACKGROUNDLainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Alexopoulou E, Kolibianakis EM. Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT). Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):683-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep436. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
PMID: 20008886BACKGROUNDAl-Inany H, Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI. Optimizing GnRH antagonist administration: meta-analysis of fixed versus flexible protocol. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 May;10(5):567-70. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61661-6.
PMID: 15949209BACKGROUNDHamdine O, Eijkemans MJ, Lentjes EW, Torrance HL, Macklon NS, Fauser BC, Broekmans FJ. Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Mullerian hormone. Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):170-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu266. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25355590BACKGROUNDEngmann L, DiLuigi A, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
PMID: 17462639BACKGROUNDLuo X, Pei L, Li F, Li C, Huang G, Ye H. Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 2;21(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03833-2.
PMID: 33934703DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hong Ye, bachelor
Genetic and Reproductive Institute, Chongqing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2015
First Posted
December 21, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 21, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12