180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma
A Randomized Trial of 180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a well-recognized way to lower eye pressure in treatment of glaucoma. This treatment is performed for 180 degrees or 360 degrees, and studies at academic centers have shown mixed results when comparing the success rates of 180 degrees or 360 degrees. Both protocols are now typically done by comprehensive ophthalmologists. However, there is no data that compares success rates of 180 degrees and 360 degrees in the community setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 5, 2020
CompletedNovember 5, 2020
November 1, 2020
3.3 years
November 23, 2015
October 12, 2020
November 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at Three Months of Follow-up
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by tonometry in millimeters of mercury at three months of follow-up
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at 1 Year of Follow-up
1 year
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at Time at Which Additional Glaucoma Therapy is Required
within 1 year of study intervention
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at Last Follow-up
within 1 year of study intervention
Other Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Spike Assessed by Tonometry
within 1 year of study intervention
Number of Participants With Trabeculitis Assessed by Ophthalmic Exam and Gonioscopy
within 1 year of study intervention
Study Arms (2)
180 degrees
ACTIVE COMPARATOR180 degrees of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty using Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser
360 degrees
ACTIVE COMPARATOR360 degrees of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty using Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser
Interventions
The procedure uses light energy provided by a neodymium (Nd):Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser that is directed into the iridocorneal angle via a goniolens viewed through a standard slit lamp.
The procedure uses a 400 μm spot size of light energy provided by a low-energy, Q-switched, frequency-doubled (532 nm) neodymium (Nd):Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser with a short pulse duration of 3 nanoseconds that is directed into the iridocorneal angle via a goniolens viewed through a standard slit lamp.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who have been diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma including ocular hypertension, pseudoexfoliation and pigment dispersion syndrome
- greater than 18 years of age
- initial intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥ 21 mmHg
You may not qualify if:
- prior medical or laser therapy to lower IOP
- previous incisional glaucoma surgery before the study period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Brandywine Eye Center
Wilmington, Delaware, 19810, United States
Levin Luminais Chronister Eye Associates
Thorndale, Pennsylvania, 19372, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There were some limitations to this study that include: No standardized definition of who needed laser; No standardized technique other than the amount of meshwork lasered; No standardized IOP checking device; No standardized post op drop regimen; No standardized follow up interval.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jeffrey Henderer
- Organization
- Temple University Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey D. Henderer, MD
Temple University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sophia Siu, MD
Temple University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2015
First Posted
December 11, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 5, 2020
Results First Posted
November 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share