Standard of Care Versus Urine Testing With Selective PHarmacogenomics for Effective Drug and Dosing REgimens
SPHERE
1 other identifier
interventional
14,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of selective pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing as determined by Urine Drug Testing (UDT) adds a clinical benefit as evidenced by a reduction in Target Drug-related Adverse Events (TDRAE) over the period following enrollment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 28, 2018
March 1, 2017
3 years
November 25, 2015
February 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The proportion of subjects who experience target drug-related adverse events (TDRAE) over the 90-day period following enrollment
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
All TDRAE as quantified within each of the four classes of medications
90 days
TDRAE driving a change in the subject's drug regimen (dose change, discontinuation, substation, or addition of a new drug)
90 days
Severe TDRAE, defined as a TDRAE that meets the criteria for a Serious Adverse Event
90 days
Ineffective therapeutic response, determined by the Investigator
90 days
Supra-therapeutic response, as determined by the Investigator
90 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care (SOC Arm)
OTHERStandard of Care UDT
Selective PGx Testing (Test Arm)
OTHERStandard of Care UDT with selective PGx testing
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is 12 years of age or older;
- Subject or legal representative is able and willing to provide informed consent;
- Subject has had a TDRAE including ineffective therapeutic response within the last 60 days or is a new patient to the treating healthcare provider's practice;
- Subject is scheduled for or is planned to be scheduled for UDT, ordered as per the treating healthcare provider's local standard of care;
- Subject is currently receiving or the subject's treating healthcare provider is considering treatment with at least one target drug listed below and metabolized by one or more genes considered in this study: Amitriptyline, Imipramine, Diazepam, Alprazolam, Codeine, Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, Methadone, Meperidine, Fentanyl and Carisoprodol.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior history of PGx testing for genes specific to any of the target drugs in the past;
- PGx testing is deemed mandatory in the opinion of the treating healthcare provider;
- History of liver or renal transplantation;
- Receiving chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis;
- Currently hospitalized or in a long-term care facility;
- Participation in another clinical trial that would, in the Investigator's opinion, interfere with the conduct of this study;
- Subject or subject's guardian or advocate is unable to provide an accurate history of the subject's medical history, medications, and symptoms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- InSource Diagnosticslead
- Syntactxcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Donald H. Deaton, Jr., DO
Tazewell, Tennessee, 37879, United States
Related Publications (36)
Phimister EG, Feero WG, Guttmacher AE. Realizing genomic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):757-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1200749. No abstract available.
PMID: 22356329BACKGROUNDRebsamen MC, Desmeules J, Daali Y, Chiappe A, Diemand A, Rey C, Chabert J, Dayer P, Hochstrasser D, Rossier MF. The AmpliChip CYP450 test: cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype assessment and phenotype prediction. Pharmacogenomics J. 2009 Feb;9(1):34-41. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2008.7. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
PMID: 18591960BACKGROUNDHicks JK, Bishop JR, Sangkuhl K, Muller DJ, Ji Y, Leckband SG, Leeder JS, Graham RL, Chiulli DL, LLerena A, Skaar TC, Scott SA, Stingl JC, Klein TE, Caudle KE, Gaedigk A; Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes and Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Aug;98(2):127-34. doi: 10.1002/cpt.147. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
PMID: 25974703BACKGROUNDCrews KR, Gaedigk A, Dunnenberger HM, Klein TE, Shen DD, Callaghan JT, Kharasch ED, Skaar TC; Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for codeine therapy in the context of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Feb;91(2):321-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.287. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
PMID: 22205192BACKGROUNDSohn DR, Kusaka M, Ishizaki T, Shin SG, Jang IJ, Shin JG, Chiba K. Incidence of S-mephenytoin hydroxylation deficiency in a Korean population and the interphenotypic differences in diazepam pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992 Aug;52(2):160-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1992.125.
PMID: 1505151BACKGROUNDBernard S, Neville KA, Nguyen AT, Flockhart DA. Interethnic differences in genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 in the U.S. population: clinical implications. Oncologist. 2006 Feb;11(2):126-35. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-2-126.
PMID: 16476833BACKGROUNDWijnen PA, Op den Buijsch RA, Drent M, Kuijpers PM, Neef C, Bast A, Bekers O, Koek GH. Review article: The prevalence and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Dec;26 Suppl 2:211-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03490.x.
PMID: 18081664BACKGROUNDLinares OA, Fudin J, Daly AL, Boston RC. Individualized Hydrocodone Therapy Based on Phenotype, Pharmacogenetics, and Pharmacokinetic Dosing. Clin J Pain. 2015 Dec;31(12):1026-35. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000214.
PMID: 25621429BACKGROUNDFalzone E, Hoffmann C, Keita H. Postoperative analgesia in elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2013 Feb;30(2):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s40266-012-0047-7.
PMID: 23288604BACKGROUNDBalhara YP, Jain R. A urinalysis-based study of buprenorphine and non-prescription opioid use among patients on buprenorphine maintenance. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;3(1):15-9. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.92496.
PMID: 22368411BACKGROUNDChristo PJ, Manchikanti L, Ruan X, Bottros M, Hansen H, Solanki DR, Jordan AE, Colson J. Urine drug testing in chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):123-43.
PMID: 21412368BACKGROUNDUher R, Farmer A, Henigsberg N, Rietschel M, Mors O, Maier W, Kozel D, Hauser J, Souery D, Placentino A, Strohmaier J, Perroud N, Zobel A, Rajewska-Rager A, Dernovsek MZ, Larsen ER, Kalember P, Giovannini C, Barreto M, McGuffin P, Aitchison KJ. Adverse reactions to antidepressants. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;195(3):202-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.061960.
PMID: 19721108BACKGROUNDVilhelmsson A, Svensson T, Meeuwisse A, Carlsten A. What can we learn from consumer reports on psychiatric adverse drug reactions with antidepressant medication? Experiences from reports to a consumer association. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Oct 25;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-11-16.
PMID: 22026961BACKGROUNDFabbri C, Serretti A. Pharmacogenetics of major depressive disorder: top genes and pathways toward clinical applications. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Jul;17(7):50. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0594-9.
PMID: 25980509BACKGROUNDKreyenbuhl JA, Valenstein M, McCarthy JF, Ganoczy D, Blow FC. Long-term antipsychotic polypharmacy in the VA health system: patient characteristics and treatment patterns. Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Apr;58(4):489-95. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.4.489.
PMID: 17412850BACKGROUNDGurwitz JH, Field TS, Avorn J, McCormick D, Jain S, Eckler M, Benser M, Edmondson AC, Bates DW. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00451-4.
PMID: 10967148BACKGROUNDMoeller KE, Lee KC, Kissack JC. Urine drug screening: practical guide for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Jan;83(1):66-76. doi: 10.4065/83.1.66.
PMID: 18174009BACKGROUNDCrews KR, Hicks JK, Pui CH, Relling MV, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics and individualized medicine: translating science into practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;92(4):467-75. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.120. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
PMID: 22948889BACKGROUNDHamburg MA, Collins FS. The path to personalized medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):301-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006304. Epub 2010 Jun 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 20551152BACKGROUNDYiannakopoulou E. Pharmacogenomics and Opioid Analgesics: Clinical Implications. Int J Genomics. 2015;2015:368979. doi: 10.1155/2015/368979. Epub 2015 May 14.
PMID: 26075211BACKGROUNDStanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA, Khalid M, Patel A, Verbrugge RR, Agatep BC, Aubert RE, Epstein RS, Frueh FW. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;91(3):450-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.306. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
PMID: 22278335BACKGROUNDDeverka PA. Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers. Public Health Genomics. 2009;12(3):149-57. doi: 10.1159/000189627. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
PMID: 19204417BACKGROUNDLocal Coverage Determination (LCD): CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 Genetic Testing (L35472). 2015. (Accessed 8/10/2015, at https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/lcd-details.aspx?LCDId=35472&ContrId=357.)
BACKGROUNDManchikanti L, Atluri S, Trescot AM, Giordano J. Monitoring opioid adherence in chronic pain patients: tools, techniques, and utility. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S155-80.
PMID: 18443638BACKGROUNDKonstantinova SV, Normann PT, Arnestad M, Karinen R, Christophersen AS, Morland J. Morphine to codeine concentration ratio in blood and urine as a marker of illicit heroin use in forensic autopsy samples. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Apr 10;217(1-3):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
PMID: 22137531BACKGROUNDStandridge JB, Adams SM, Zotos AP. Urine drug screening: a valuable office procedure. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Mar 1;81(5):635-40.
PMID: 20187600BACKGROUNDDisability Evaluation Under Social Security. (Accessed 3/5/2014, 2014, at http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/general-info.htm.)
BACKGROUNDInter-agency guideline for opioid dosing for chronic non-cancer pain.2010.
BACKGROUNDNational Bioeconomy Blueprint. The White House; 2012:48.
BACKGROUNDWorld Guide for Drug Use and Pharmacogenomics. Corunna, Spain: EuroEspes Publishing; 2012.
BACKGROUNDModel policy on the use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of chronic pain. Federation of State Medical Boards; 2013.
BACKGROUNDACOEM. Guidelines for the Chronic Use of Opioids. 2 ed: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
BACKGROUNDMichna E, Jamison RN, Pham LD, Ross EL, Janfaza D, Nedeljkovic SS, Narang S, Palombi D, Wasan AD. Urine toxicology screening among chronic pain patients on opioid therapy: frequency and predictability of abnormal findings. Clin J Pain. 2007 Feb;23(2):173-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31802b4f95.
PMID: 17237667BACKGROUNDWiedemer NL, Harden PS, Arndt IO, Gallagher RM. The opioid renewal clinic: a primary care, managed approach to opioid therapy in chronic pain patients at risk for substance abuse. Pain Med. 2007 Oct-Nov;8(7):573-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00254.x.
PMID: 17883742BACKGROUNDGandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, Seger AC, Peterson J, Burdick E, Seger DL, Shu K, Federico F, Leape LL, Bates DW. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1556-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020703.
PMID: 12700376BACKGROUNDManchikanti L, Manchikanti KN, Pampati V, Cash KA. Prevalence of side effects of prolonged low or moderate dose opioid therapy with concomitant benzodiazepine and/or antidepressant therapy in chronic non-cancer pain. Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):259-67.
PMID: 19165308BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2015
First Posted
December 9, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 28, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-03