NCT02624791

Brief Summary

Small amounts of astigmatism are often uncorrected in contact lens wearers. The effect with respect to driving is unknown, but it could threaten safe operation of a motor vehicle, especially under conditions such as nighttime driving when visual abilities are highly challenged. This study measures driving-specific visual abilities and simulated driving performance in participants with astigmatism who either have or do not have their astigmatism corrected. The primary hypothesis is that at a tactical level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in safer driving performance overall. The secondary hypothesis is that at an operational level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in better driving-specific visual performance.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2012

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2013

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2015

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 23, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 30, 2013

Results QC Date

October 26, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

astigmatism, contact lens, driving

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tactical Composite Score

    Z-score composite of tactical testing outcomes

    1 day laboratory study

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Operational Composite Score

    1 day laboratory study

Study Arms (6)

Lens sequence 1

EXPERIMENTAL

No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lensesDevice: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lensesOther: No contact lenses

Lens sequence 2

EXPERIMENTAL

No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lensesDevice: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lensesOther: No contact lenses

Lens sequence 3

EXPERIMENTAL

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lensesDevice: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lensesOther: No contact lenses

Lens sequence 4

EXPERIMENTAL

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; No contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lensesDevice: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lensesOther: No contact lenses

Lens sequence 5

EXPERIMENTAL

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses; No contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lensesDevice: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lensesOther: No contact lenses

Lens sequence 6

EXPERIMENTAL

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses; No contact lenses; 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Device: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lensesDevice: 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lensesOther: No contact lenses

Interventions

spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Lens sequence 1Lens sequence 2Lens sequence 3Lens sequence 4Lens sequence 5Lens sequence 6

toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Lens sequence 1Lens sequence 2Lens sequence 3Lens sequence 4Lens sequence 5Lens sequence 6

simulated driving tests

Lens sequence 1Lens sequence 2Lens sequence 3Lens sequence 4Lens sequence 5Lens sequence 6

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 39 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Bilateral corrected vision of 20/40 or better
  • Bilateral astigmatism between 0.75 to 2.0 diopters, with spherical correction from -1 to -6
  • No active eye infection
  • No defective peripheral vision
  • Do not have correction for bifocals
  • Routinely wear contact lenses more than 4 times per week
  • Routinely drive a car more than 4 times week
  • Do not have a history of motion, sea or big screen (e.g. IMAX) sickness or experience persistent Simulation Adaptation Syndrome

You may not qualify if:

  • Bilateral corrected vision of worse than 20/40
  • No astigmatism
  • Active eye infection
  • Defective peripheral vision
  • Wear bifocals
  • Wears contact lenses less than 4 times per week
  • Drives infrequently (less than 4 times per week)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Virginia Driving Safety Lab

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Cox DJ, Banton T, Record S, Grabman JH, Hawkins RJ. Does correcting astigmatism with toric lenses improve driving performance? Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Apr;92(4):404-11. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000554.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

small number of subjects analyzed

Results Point of Contact

Title
Project Coordinator
Organization
UVa Center for Behavioral Medicine Research

Study Officials

  • Daniel J Cox, Ph.D.

    University of Virginia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
participants and research assistant blind to hypothesis
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Department of Psychiatry and NB Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2013

First Posted

December 8, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion

January 1, 2013

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

March 6, 2020

Results First Posted

May 23, 2017

Record last verified: 2020-02

Locations