TRAP Intervention STudy: Early Versus Late Intervention for Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence
TRAPIST
Early Versus Late Intervention for Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: an Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial: TRAPIST - TRAP Intervention STudy
1 other identifier
interventional
126
11 countries
14
Brief Summary
Multi-center open-label randomized controlled trial to assess if early intervention (12.0-14.0 weeks) (study group) improves the outcome of TRAP sequence as compared to late intervention (16.0-19.0 weeks) (control group). The investigators will randomly assign women diagnosed with TRAP sequence diagnosed between 12.0 and 13.6 weeks to an early or late intervention group (1:1), using a web-based application and a computer-generated list with random permuted blocks of sizes 2 or 4 (www.sealedenvelope.com), stratified by gestational age (GA) at inclusion (11.6 -12.6 weeks versus 13.0-13.6 weeks). Analysis will be by intention to treat.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 10, 2024
July 1, 2024
9.1 years
November 12, 2015
July 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with neonatal survival and birth at or after 34.0 weeks of the pump twin
2 weeks after expected date of birth
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Number of patients with need for re-intervention
2 weeks after expected date of birth
Number of patients with maternal morbidity
2 weeks after expected date of birth
Number of patients with miscarriage
2 weeks after expected date of birth
Number of patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM)
2 weeks after expected date of birth
Number of patients with preterm birth prior to 28 weeks
2 weeks after expected date of birth
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Early intervention
EXPERIMENTALIntervention between 12.0 and 14.0 weeks. Early selective reduction of TRAP mass.
Late intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention between 16.0 and 19.0 weeks. Late selective reduction of TRAP mass. This is the standard timing of the intervention. One of two possible techniques for late reduction is chosen by the treating physician.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided intrafetal ablation using an 18 Gauge to 20 Gauge needle
Ultrasound-guided intrafetal ablation using a 17 Gauge to 20 Gauge needle OR fetoscopic laser coagulation of the cord or anastomising vessels through a 17 Gauge to 7 French trocar, with a 1-1,3 mm fetoscope and a 400 µm laser fiber. The treating physician can decide which technique will be used for the selective reduction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- TRAP sequence in a monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy diagnosed between 11.6 and 13.6 weeks, as determined by the crown-rump length of the pump twin in spontaneous conceptions and by the date of insemination or embryonic age at replacement in pregnancies resulting from subfertility treatment
- Women aged 18 years or more, who are able to consent
- Anatomically normal pump twin
- Provide written informed consent to participate in this randomized controlled trial, forms being approved by the Ethical Committees
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication for an intervention due to a severe maternal medical condition or threatening miscarriage
- Inaccessibility of the acardiac twin due to a retroverted uterus, severe maternal obesity, uterine fibroids, bowel or placental superposition
- A major anomaly in the pump twin, requiring surgery or leading to infant death or severe handicap
- Spontaneous arrest of the reverse flow and/or pump twin demise at diagnosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvenlead
- St. George's Hospital, University of London (UK sponsor)collaborator
- Leiden University Medical Centercollaborator
- Ospedalo Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Italycollaborator
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'hebron Barcelona, Spaincollaborator
- Centro Médico-Chirurgical et Obstétrical (CMCO) Schiltigheim, Francecollaborator
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Graz, Austriacollaborator
- Ospedale dei Bambini "Vittore Buzzi" Milano, Italycollaborator
- Birmingham Women's Hospital, UKcollaborator
- Sheba Medical Centercollaborator
- Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital Houston Texas, USAcollaborator
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germanycollaborator
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Canadacollaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
- University Hospital Innsbruck, Austriacollaborator
- Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Italycollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
Graz, Austria
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Canada
Centre Médico-Chirurgical et Obstétrical
Schiltigheim, France
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
Sheba Medical Center
Tel Litwinsky, Israel
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, Italy
Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi
Milan, Italy
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, Netherlands
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham, United Kingdom
King's College
London, United Kingdom
St. George's Hospital, University of London (UK sponsor)
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (11)
Moore TR, Gale S, Benirschke K. Perinatal outcome of forty-nine pregnancies complicated by acardiac twinning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):907-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91094-s.
PMID: 2206078BACKGROUNDPagani G, D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Papageorghiou A, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Intrafetal laser treatment for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: cohort study and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;42(1):6-14. doi: 10.1002/uog.12495.
PMID: 23640771BACKGROUNDHecher K, Lewi L, Gratacos E, Huber A, Ville Y, Deprest J. Twin reversed arterial perfusion: fetoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses or the umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;28(5):688-91. doi: 10.1002/uog.3816.
PMID: 16958150BACKGROUNDChaveeva P, Poon LC, Sotiriadis A, Kosinski P, Nicolaides KH. Optimal method and timing of intrauterine intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: case study and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;35(4):267-79. doi: 10.1159/000358593. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
PMID: 24751835BACKGROUNDLewi L, Valencia C, Gonzalez E, Deprest J, Nicolaides KH. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):213.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.018. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
PMID: 20522408BACKGROUNDO'Donoghue K, Barigye O, Pasquini L, Chappell L, Wimalasundera RC, Fisk NM. Interstitial laser therapy for fetal reduction in monochorionic multiple pregnancy: loss rate and association with aplasia cutis congenita. Prenat Diagn. 2008 Jun;28(6):535-43. doi: 10.1002/pd.2025.
PMID: 18509857BACKGROUNDScheier M, Molina FS. Outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence following treatment with interstitial laser: a retrospective study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(1):35-41. doi: 10.1159/000334156. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
PMID: 22204966BACKGROUNDBerg C, Holst D, Mallmann MR, Gottschalk I, Gembruch U, Geipel A. Early vs late intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;43(1):60-4. doi: 10.1002/uog.12578.
PMID: 23908075BACKGROUNDJelin E, Hirose S, Rand L, Curran P, Feldstein V, Guevara-Gallardo S, Jelin A, Gonzales K, Goldstein R, Lee H. Perinatal outcome of conservative management versus fetal intervention for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence with a small acardiac twin. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(3):138-41. doi: 10.1159/000295176. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
PMID: 20215730BACKGROUNDLewi L, Gratacos E, Ortibus E, Van Schoubroeck D, Carreras E, Higueras T, Perapoch J, Deprest J. Pregnancy and infant outcome of 80 consecutive cord coagulations in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.013.
PMID: 16522413BACKGROUNDKerstjens JM, Nijhuis A, Hulzebos CV, van Imhoff DE, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, van Haastert IC, Lopriore E, Katgert T, Swarte RM, van Lingen RA, Mulder TL, Laarman CR, Steiner K, Dijk PH. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire and Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Two-Year-Old Preterm-Born Children. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0133087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133087. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26193474BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Liesbeth Lewi, MD PhD
UZ Leuven
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2015
First Posted
December 3, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07