NCT02621346

Brief Summary

Mental imagery is effective for improving motor skills as well as increasing muscles strength and size. Strength is also maintained after immobilization of a muscles when engaging in imagery. This may have important implications for rehabilitation settings and for sedentary individuals. We may not be able to get people wot exercise but if they can maintain muscles size and strength via imagery this may have beneficial health and functional outcomes.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 3, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 1, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

December 1, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Muslce mass (grams) determined by the DEXA body scan.

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Muscle strength

    4 weeks

Study Arms (3)

Imagery Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The imagery group, will sit on the leg press and image completing 3 sets of leg press. The imagery group will be asked to fill out the Movement Imagery Questionnaire -revised as this gives us a measure of imagery ability. The imagery group will be given an imagery script prior to imaging. Weekly manipulation checks will be completed to ensure that participants are imagining what they are supposed to.

Behavioral: Imagery

Maintenance Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The maintenance group will continue to perform the leg press three times per week at 1/3rd of final strength assessment. This is the percentage of intensity recommended to maintain muscle mass and strength gains by the American College of Sports Medicine.

Behavioral: Muscle Maintenance

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group will come in 3 times per week for 20 minutes and complete 3 sets of 8-12 of a bicep curl 1/3 of predicted 1 RM

Behavioral: Bicep Curls

Interventions

ImageryBEHAVIORAL

Prior to exercising participants will be given an imagery script. Afterwards, participants will imagine completing the leg press.

Imagery Group

Participants complete the leg press exercises at an intensity that promotes muscle maintenance but not muscle growth

Maintenance Group
Bicep CurlsBEHAVIORAL

Control group participants will complete a bicep exercise at a maintenance training intensity.

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Exercise and health Psychology Lab

London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Clark BC, Mahato NK, Nakazawa M, Law TD, Thomas JS. The power of the mind: the cortex as a critical determinant of muscle strength/weakness. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 15;112(12):3219-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.00386.2014. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

    PMID: 25274345BACKGROUND
  • Cumming, J., & Ramsey, R. (2009). Imagery interventions in sport. In S.D Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.)., Advances in applied sport psychology: A review (pp.5-36). London: Routledge

    BACKGROUND
  • Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60-83.

    BACKGROUND
  • Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.

    PMID: 4053261BACKGROUND
  • Lebon F, Collet C, Guillot A. Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1680-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d8e936.

    PMID: 20508474BACKGROUND
  • Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Liu JZ, Sahgal V, Yue GH. From mental power to muscle power--gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):944-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.018.

    PMID: 14998709BACKGROUND
  • Yao, G. H., Wilson, S. L., Cole, K.J., Darline, W.G., Tuh, W. T. C. (1996). Imagined muscle contraction training increases voluntary neural drive to muscle. Journal of Pscyhophysiology, 10, 198-208.

    BACKGROUND
  • Yao WX, Ranganathan VK, Allexandre D, Siemionow V, Yue GH. Kinesthetic imagery training of forceful muscle contractions increases brain signal and muscle strength. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 26;7:561. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00561. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24133427BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Candidate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2015

First Posted

December 3, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

April 1, 2018

Study Completion

April 1, 2018

Last Updated

November 1, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data will provided to each participant at the end of the study.

Locations