Comparison of PillCamCOLON (C2) Capsule and Standard Endoscopy for the Evaluation of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
VCC2-RCH
Comparison of the PillCamCOLON (C2) Capsule With Standard Endoscopy for the Evaluation of the Severity and the Endoscopic Healing of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease progressing through flare-ups. The therapeutic objective, which was originally based on clinical remission, is currently evolving with the development of biotherapies towards the achievement of endoscopic remission. Current recommendations for therapeutic management advocate the achievement of endoscopic mucosal healing (EMH), with an observed decrease in the necessity for colectomy in the case of EMH. Endoscopic evaluation of the severity of UC is performed during a digestive endoscopy (colonoscopy for a complete colonic exploration, or recto-sigmoidoscopy for a partial exploration of the colon) from endoscopic activity scores adapted for UC. Currently, the score the most commonly used is the MAYO endoscopic score. This is a global score of increasing intensity from 0 to 3, taking into account the following basic lesions: vascular pattern, granularity or/and friability of the mucosa, spontaneous bleeding, erosion and ulceration. However this score has limits: it does not distinguish deep cavitating ulcerations with mucous detachment from simple ulcerations which have a better prognosis. A new endoscopic score specific for UC has been developed and is currently being validated. It is termed Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). This evaluation takes into account the three most reproducible factors - the vascular pattern, the presence of bleeding, and erosions or ulcerations including cavitating ulceration - in the total score. To ensure optimal patient care and an adaptation of the therapeutic medical care to the endoscopic severity of the disease, endoscopic exploration should be performed recurrently. However, this exploration is an invasive procedure, requires general anaesthesia for colonoscopy, and can lead to potential complications such as perforation. This explains the poor acceptance by patients, resulting in a sub-optimal therapeutic support.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedNovember 29, 2024
November 1, 2024
3.4 years
April 27, 2015
November 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Concordance between PillCamCOLON (C2) and conventional endoscopy for evaluation of the endoscopic MAYO score in patients with UC.
MAYO endoscopic score established by PillCamCOLON (C2) and conventional endoscopy of the common recto-colonic segment explored at week 12 (W12).
week 12 (W12)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Concordance between PillCamCOLON (C2) and conventional endoscopy for evaluation of the UCEIS score in patients with UC.
Week 12
Concordance between PillCamCOLON (C2) and conventional endoscopy for measuring the variation of Mayo scores during an anti-TNF alpha or vedolizumab treatment
Week 12
Concordance between PillCamCOLON (C2) and conventional endoscopy for measuring the variation of the UCEIS scores during an anti-TNF alpha or vedolizumab treatment
Week 12
Presence of lesions upstream of the left colonic flexure using PillCamCOLON (C2), when recto-sigmoidoscopy is the conventional endoscopic procedure used.
Week 12
Capacity of PillCamCOLON (C2) to define endoscopic mucosal healing (MAYO score 0 and 1) as compared with recto-sigmoidoscopy, during treatment with anti-TNFalpha or vedolizumab.
Week 12
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
standart endoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention: 2 standard endoscopy during anti-TNFalpha or vedolizumab treatment
PillCamCOLON (C2)
EXPERIMENTALIntervention : 2 PillCamCOLON (C2) during anti-TNFalpha or vedolizumab treatment
Interventions
standard endoscopy will be either colonoscopy or rectosigmoidoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patient between 18 and 70 years old
- Patient with UC requiring treatment with anti-TNFalpha or vedolizumab
- Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
- Patient able to understand and follow the study instructions
- Patient having signed an informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with severe and acute colitis
- Patient with Crohn's disease or non-classified colitis
- Patient with an indication for surgical management of UC
- Patient with a history of sub-total or total colectomy, or with colostomy or ileostomy.
- Patient with a history of intestinal irradiation
- Patient with a known or suspected intestinal stricture
- Patient with clinical signs suggestive of intestinal stricture
- Patient with dysphagia with choking on solid food or swallowing disorders
- Patient with a contra-indication for an anti TNFalpha treatment
- Patient with a contra-indication for conventional endoscopy (colonoscopy or recto-sigmoidoscopy)
- Patient with congestive heart failure or severe renal impairment
- Patient with a pacemaker or other implanted electronic medical device
- Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial
- Pregnant or nursing woman
- Vulnerable individuals: persons deprived of liberty, under tutelage or guardianship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Nantes
Nantes, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arnaud Bourreille, MD
University Hospital of Nantes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2015
First Posted
November 20, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
November 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11