NCT02601144

Brief Summary

This is the first study on the effect of the variable frequency stimulation (VFS) on Freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with STN DBS. FOG has responded poorly to High frequency stimulation (HFS) but can be alleviated by relatively VFS. This study would have significant clinical implications in the management of Freezing of gait (FOG) in these PD patients with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. The investigators hypothesize that VFS could have better effect on FOG than HFS and low frequency stimulation (LFS).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 12, 2015

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 21, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 12, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

DBSVFSFOG

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) task

    variable frequency stimulation (VFS) setting compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS) and low frequency stimulation (LFS)

    The outcome of TUG task at 12 months follow-up.

  • the number of freezing episodes for TUG task

    variable frequency stimulation (VFS) setting compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS) and low frequency stimulation (LFS)

    The outcome of TUG task at 12 months follow-up.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • UPDRS III scores

    Outcome of VFS at 6、12 months with reference to baseline HFS

  • Gait and Falls Questionnaire (GFQ) scores

    Outcome of VFS at 6、12 months with reference to baseline HFS

  • the39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores

    Outcome of VFS at 6、12 months with reference to baseline HFS

  • the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q) scores

    Outcome of VFS at 6 、12months with reference to baseline HFS

  • Number of adverse events (AE's)

    Change from Baseline to 6、12 Months

Study Arms (4)

VFS

EXPERIMENTAL

variable frequency deep brain stimulation (VFS)

Device: Deep Brain Stimulation

HFS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

high frequency deep brain stimulation (HFS)

Device: Deep Brain Stimulation

LFS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

low frequency deep brain stimulation (LFS)

Device: Deep Brain Stimulation

DBS off

NO INTERVENTION

deep brain stimulation off

Interventions

Deep Brain Stimulation

HFSLFSVFS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients were receiving bilateral STN stimulation for more than six months.
  • They were optimized on conventional HFS for control of tremors, rigidity and bradykinesia yet complained of freezing of gait.
  • Subjects had an ability to walk at least 10 meters independently during ON DBS condition.

You may not qualify if:

  • gait disorders perceived by patients as a direct consequence of STN stimulation and not the primary disease.
  • any change in the HFS DBS settings, three months prior to participation in the study.
  • complete inability to walk despite assistance while DBS ON.
  • Subjects responding to reprogramming of chronic DBS settings (report improvement of freezing).
  • Subjects could not tolerate prolonged OFF medication condition.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Tsinghua University Yuquan Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100040, China

Location

Beijing Tian Tan Hospital,Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Interventions

Deep Brain Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Luming Li, Ph.D

    Tsinghua University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Michael Okun, MD.

    University of Florida

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2015

First Posted

November 10, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 21, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations