Effect of Macronutrient Supplementation on Glycemic Index of Pita Bread
Glycemic Index of Bread: Fiber or Minerals? This is the Question.
1 other identifier
interventional
96
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Glycemic index (GI) of food is known to be positively associated with the development of several diseases including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and age-related macular degeneration. Modest dietary changes from high-GI foods to low-GI foods have shown beneficial effects. These findings have been translated to recommendations for increased dietary intake of whole grains. However, the inverse relationship between whole grain consumption and risk of the different components of metabolic syndrome has not been explained by their fiber content. Trials of added cereal fiber have failed to induce a protective effect and fiber has thus been proposed to be a marker of other components of whole grains that impart health advantages. Whole wheat grains are known to be a rich source of several minerals (phosphorus, potassium and magnesium) that play a role in glucose metabolism, and are depleted during the process of refinement. Thus, it is plausible to hypothesize that the benefits of whole grains previously ascribed to their fiber content are in fact due to these minerals. The proposed research aims to restore or fortify white bread with these minerals and determine the resulting glycemic index of mineral-fortified bread. With much evidence that most people prefer the taste and color of white bread, a low GI, mineral fortified white bread has the potential to reduce the risk of Metabolic Syndrome in those who consume it.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes
Started Jun 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2015
CompletedNovember 6, 2015
November 1, 2015
2 years
November 4, 2015
November 5, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
AUC of serum glucose
two hours
Study Arms (4)
white pita bread
PLACEBO COMPARATORPita bread made of white wheat flour
Whole grain pita bread
NO INTERVENTIONno macronutrient supplementation
Restored white pita bread
EXPERIMENTALmacronutrient supplementation
Fortified white pita bread
EXPERIMENTALmacronutrient supplementation 2
Interventions
adding of phosphorus, potassium and magnesium
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Healthy subjects
You may not qualify if:
- any disease, pregnant and lactating
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2015
First Posted
November 6, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11