DCD Imaging-Intervention Study
Developmental Coordination Disorder: Integrating Brain Imaging and Rehabilitation to Improve Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
115
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) affects 5-6% of the school-age population, equating to \~400,000 children, or 1-2 students in every Canadian classroom. Children with DCD find it hard to learn motor skills and perform everyday activities, such as getting dressed, tying shoelaces, using utensils, printing, riding a bicycle, or playing sports. Researchers and clinicians do not know what causes DCD or why children with DCD struggle to learn motor skills. Using MRI, this study will increase understanding of how the brain differs in children with/without DCD and determine if rehabilitation can change the brain and improve outcomes of children with the disorder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 22, 2020
July 1, 2020
5.4 years
October 19, 2015
July 20, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Children will rate performance and satisfaction (10 point Likert scale) of their three motor goals
12 weeks
diffusion tensor imaging
fractional anisotropy and diffusivity (mean, axial, and radial)
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Bruininks Osteretsky Test of Motor Proficiency
12 weeks
Performance Quality Rating Scale
12 weeks
functional connectivity
12 weeks
functional magnetic resonance imaging
12 weeks
morphometry
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Treatment Arm
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are randomized to treatment group. After the first MRI scan, participants are assessed by an independent occupational therapist (before and after intervention) and participate in 10 treatment sessions with a treating occupational therapist. Following the post-treatment assessment, participants have a second MRI scan. Twelve weeks later, participants have a third, follow-up scan.
Waitlist control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants are randomized to the waitlist control group. After the first MRI scan, participants "wait" for 12 weeks and then have a 2nd MRI scan. Participants then have 10 treatment sessions with an occupational therapist and are assessed by an independent occupational therapist before and after treatment. Participants then have a third MRI scan to examine brain changes associated with intervention.
Interventions
CO-OP is a cognitive approach to solving functional motor problems (Polatajko et al., 2001b). Therapists teach children a global problem solving strategy (Goal-Plan-Do-Check) as a framework for developing specific strategies for overcoming motor problems; these strategies are determined after a dynamic performance analysis by the therapist to determine where the "breakdown" is in performing the task. Occupational therapists will see children once weekly for one hour over 10 weeks as per published protocol (Polatajko et al., 2001b), plus two assessment sessions. Children will select three functional motor goals to be addressed over the course of treatment, rating their performance and satisfaction of these goals pre- and post-intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children with suspected DCD based on history and results of motor testing (MABC-2) and parent questionnaire (DCDQ) and interview
- typically developing children who score at or above 25th percentile on MABC-2
You may not qualify if:
- a medical condition that could explain motor problem, such as cerebral palsy, significant intellectual disability, or visual impairment
- children with ferrous metal in their body
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4, Canada
Related Publications (13)
Zwicker JG, Missiuna C, Boyd LA. Neural correlates of developmental coordination disorder: a review of hypotheses. J Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;24(10):1273-81. doi: 10.1177/0883073809333537. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
PMID: 19687388BACKGROUNDZwicker JG, Missiuna C, Harris SR, Boyd LA. Brain activation of children with developmental coordination disorder is different than peers. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e678-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0059. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
PMID: 20713484BACKGROUNDZwicker JG, Missiuna C, Harris SR, Boyd LA. Brain activation associated with motor skill practice in children with developmental coordination disorder: an fMRI study. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;29(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
PMID: 21145385BACKGROUNDZwicker JG, Missiuna C, Harris SR, Boyd LA. Developmental coordination disorder: a pilot diffusion tensor imaging study. Pediatr Neurol. 2012 Mar;46(3):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2011.12.007.
PMID: 22353291BACKGROUNDLangevin LM, Macmaster FP, Crawford S, Lebel C, Dewey D. Common white matter microstructure alterations in pediatric motor and attention disorders. J Pediatr. 2014 May;164(5):1157-1164.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
PMID: 24576693BACKGROUNDPolatajko HJ, Mandich AD, Missiuna C, Miller LT, Macnab JJ, Malloy-Miller T, Kinsella EA. Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): part III--the protocol in brief. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;20(2-3):107-23.
PMID: 11345506BACKGROUNDMiller LT, Polatajko HJ, Missiuna C, Mandich AD, Macnab JJ. A pilot trial of a cognitive treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2001 Mar;20(1-2):183-210. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00034-3.
PMID: 11471396BACKGROUNDPolatajko HJ, Cantin N. Developmental coordination disorder (dyspraxia): an overview of the state of the art. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2005 Dec;12(4):250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2005.12.007.
PMID: 16780296BACKGROUNDSmits-Engelsman BC, Blank R, van der Kaay AC, Mosterd-van der Meijs R, Vlugt-van den Brand E, Polatajko HJ, Wilson PH. Efficacy of interventions to improve motor performance in children with developmental coordination disorder: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Mar;55(3):229-37. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12008. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
PMID: 23106530BACKGROUNDMalik MA, Weber AM, Lang D, Vanderwal T, Zwicker JG. Changes in cortical grey matter volume with Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance intervention in children with developmental coordination disorder. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 22;18:1316117. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1316117. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38841123DERIVEDMalik M, Weber A, Lang D, Vanderwal T, Zwicker JG. Cortical grey matter volume differences in children with developmental coordination disorder compared to typically developing children. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 17;18:1276057. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1276057. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38826616DERIVEDIzadi-Najafabadi S, Gunton C, Dureno Z, Zwicker JG. Effectiveness of Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance intervention in improving motor skills of children with developmental coordination disorder: A randomized waitlist-control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2022 Jun;36(6):776-788. doi: 10.1177/02692155221086188. Epub 2022 Apr 24.
PMID: 35466705DERIVEDIzadi-Najafabadi S, Zwicker JG. White Matter Changes With Rehabilitation in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 3;15:673003. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.673003. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34149383DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jill G Zwicker, PhD, OT(C)
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2015
First Posted
November 5, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07