Nefopam/Fentanyl Postoperative Intravenous Patient-Controlled-Analgesia
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect and Safety of Intravenous Nefopam/Fentanyl Postoperative Patient-Controlled-Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
73
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND : There has been increasing interest on the use of nefopam in i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). OBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate the opioid-sparing effect of nefopam, when administered via i.v. PCA with fentanyl, after laparotomy. The adverse events associated with its use were also evaluated, and specific considerations in its clinical use were reviewed. DESIGN : A randomized, controlled, single-centre, double-blinded study. SETTING : One Korean university hospital. PATIENTS : Seventy-one patients planned for elective open laparotomy INTERVENTIONS : Patients were assigned into SF (control) or NF group, who received IV PCA with fentanyl in normal saline (25 µg/ml), or a solution with 120 mg of nefopam included (fentanyl 25 µg/ml and nefopam 1.2 mg/ml), respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : The pain intensity during the 24 h study period and patient satisfaction at the end of the study were evaluated. Adverse events were observed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Oct 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2015
CompletedNovember 5, 2015
November 1, 2015
11 months
October 23, 2015
November 3, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
fentanyl consumption
during the stay at PACU, at the end of intervention (24h after surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
pain intensity (NRS scores)
1h, 2h, 6h, 12h and 24h postoperatively
Satisfaction on analgesia using 4-points VRS (0: no satisfaction, 1: mild satisfaction, 2: moderate satisfaction, and 3: intense satisfaction)
at the end of the study (24 h after the surgery)
hypertension, tachycardia, sweating, shivering, nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritis and/or dry mouth
Throughout study on report-based (24h)
hypertension, tachycardia
1h, 2h, 6h, 12h and 24h postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Nefopam(NF) group
EXPERIMENTALReceived i.v. PCA with the same volume of solution containing 1250 µg fentanyl plus 120 mg of nefopam in normal saline (fentanyl 12.5 µg/ml and nefopam 1.2 mg/ml).
Saline(SF) group
PLACEBO COMPARATORReceived i.v. PCA with 100 ml solution containing 1250 µg of fentanyl in normal saline (12.5 µg/ml),
Interventions
120 mg of nefopam is included in the i.v. PCA with with 100 ml solution containing 1250 µg fentanyl. a bolus of 1 ml with an 8-min lockout time was set, without any background continuous infusion. After the end of surgery, and if the goal VRS score was achieved at PACU, PCA device was turned on and the patient was encouraged to use the pre-set bolus dose, until 24h after the end of surgery.
i.v. PCA with with 100 ml solution containing 1250 µg fentanyl. a bolus of 1 ml with an 8-min lockout time
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- those planned for elective open laparotomy under general anesthesia, who were classified as ASA physical status I-II
You may not qualify if:
- the presence of renal and hepatic disease, high risk of urinary retention, seizure history, known allergy to any of the medications used, current history of psychiatric disorder, or those presently taking psychotropic medications or monoamine oxidase inhibitors.
- Patients who could not understand verbal rating scale (VRS) and 11-points numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, or did not sign on informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospitallead
- Pharmbio Korea Co., Ltd.collaborator
Related Publications (2)
Oh CS, Jung E, Lee SJ, Kim SH. Effect of nefopam- versus fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Aug;31(8):1599-607. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1058251. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
PMID: 26047392BACKGROUNDJin HS, Kim YC, Yoo Y, Lee C, Cho CW, Kim WJ. Opioid sparing effect and safety of nefopam in patient controlled analgesia after laparotomy: A randomized, double blind study. J Int Med Res. 2016 Aug;44(4):844-54. doi: 10.1177/0300060516650783. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
PMID: 27358262DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yong Chul Kim, MD., PhD.
Seoul National University Hospital, Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2015
First Posted
November 4, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 5, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11