NCT02595307

Brief Summary

To determine if providing a written document in addition to the standard oral discussion of surgical risks improves risk recall for the parents/guardians of a child seen in consultation for cleft palate surgery, and if this has any effect on overall satisfaction after the procedure

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2015

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2015

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Risk RecallPamphletBrochurePatient satisfactionInformed Consent

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of risks recalled

    The number of risks that are recalled by the patient at a 3 week follow up phone call.

    3 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Participant Satisfaction as measured with the visual-analogue scale

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Pamphlet

EXPERIMENTAL

Participant group that will receive a written pamphlet outlining the risks of surgery as discussed in consultation.

Behavioral: Pamphlet

No Pamphlet

NO INTERVENTION

Patient group that will not receive a written pamphlet outlining the risks of surgery as discussed in consultation.

Interventions

PamphletBEHAVIORAL

Written pamphlet outlining the risks of surgery as discussed in consultation.

Pamphlet

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Parents/guardians of a child referred to the IWK Cleft Palate Clinic for primary cleft palate repair surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to fluently communicate in English
  • Inability to read at a grade 8 level
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IWK Health Center

Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Aremu SK, Alabi BS, Segun-Busari S. The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):485-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

    PMID: 21093107BACKGROUND
  • Nadeau DP, Rich JN, Brietzke SE. Informed consent in pediatric surgery: Do parents understand the risks? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Mar;136(3):265-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.5.

    PMID: 20231645BACKGROUND
  • Lavelle-Jones C, Byrne DJ, Rice P, Cuschieri A. Factors affecting quality of informed consent. BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):885-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.885.

    PMID: 8490411BACKGROUND
  • Leclercq WK, Keulers BJ, Houterman S, Veerman M, Legemaate J, Scheltinga MR. A survey of the current practice of the informed consent process in general surgery in the Netherlands. Patient Saf Surg. 2013 Jan 21;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-4.

    PMID: 23336609BACKGROUND
  • Leclercq WK, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MR, Spauwen PH, van der Wilt GJ. A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1406-15. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0.

    PMID: 20372902BACKGROUND
  • Chan Y, Irish JC, Wood SJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ, Lockwood GA. Patient education and informed consent in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Nov;128(11):1269-74. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.11.1269.

    PMID: 12431168BACKGROUND
  • Siau D, List RJ, Hussin N, Woolford TJ. Do printed information leaflets improve recall of the procedure and risks in adult tonsillectomy? How we do it. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;35(6):503-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02227.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21199416BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cleft PalateJaw AbnormalitiesMaxillofacial AbnormalitiesMouth AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesJaw DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesCraniofacial AbnormalitiesMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesPatient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Michael Bezuhly, MD FRCSC

    IWK Health Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Michael Bezuhly, MD FRCSC

CONTACT

Mona Al-Taha, MD Candidate

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2015

First Posted

November 3, 2015

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

March 8, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Aggregate results only will be shared.

Locations