Improving Informed Consent for Cleft Palate Repair
Role of a Written Summary on Risk Recall During Consent Process for Cleft Palate Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine if providing a written document in addition to the standard oral discussion of surgical risks improves risk recall for the parents/guardians of a child seen in consultation for cleft palate surgery, and if this has any effect on overall satisfaction after the procedure
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedMarch 8, 2017
March 1, 2017
3.3 years
November 2, 2015
March 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of risks recalled
The number of risks that are recalled by the patient at a 3 week follow up phone call.
3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Participant Satisfaction as measured with the visual-analogue scale
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Pamphlet
EXPERIMENTALParticipant group that will receive a written pamphlet outlining the risks of surgery as discussed in consultation.
No Pamphlet
NO INTERVENTIONPatient group that will not receive a written pamphlet outlining the risks of surgery as discussed in consultation.
Interventions
Written pamphlet outlining the risks of surgery as discussed in consultation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents/guardians of a child referred to the IWK Cleft Palate Clinic for primary cleft palate repair surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to fluently communicate in English
- Inability to read at a grade 8 level
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IWK Health Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8, Canada
Related Publications (7)
Aremu SK, Alabi BS, Segun-Busari S. The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):485-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
PMID: 21093107BACKGROUNDNadeau DP, Rich JN, Brietzke SE. Informed consent in pediatric surgery: Do parents understand the risks? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Mar;136(3):265-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.5.
PMID: 20231645BACKGROUNDLavelle-Jones C, Byrne DJ, Rice P, Cuschieri A. Factors affecting quality of informed consent. BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):885-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.885.
PMID: 8490411BACKGROUNDLeclercq WK, Keulers BJ, Houterman S, Veerman M, Legemaate J, Scheltinga MR. A survey of the current practice of the informed consent process in general surgery in the Netherlands. Patient Saf Surg. 2013 Jan 21;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-4.
PMID: 23336609BACKGROUNDLeclercq WK, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MR, Spauwen PH, van der Wilt GJ. A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1406-15. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0.
PMID: 20372902BACKGROUNDChan Y, Irish JC, Wood SJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ, Lockwood GA. Patient education and informed consent in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Nov;128(11):1269-74. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.11.1269.
PMID: 12431168BACKGROUNDSiau D, List RJ, Hussin N, Woolford TJ. Do printed information leaflets improve recall of the procedure and risks in adult tonsillectomy? How we do it. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;35(6):503-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02227.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 21199416BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Bezuhly, MD FRCSC
IWK Health Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2015
First Posted
November 3, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Aggregate results only will be shared.