NCT02594176

Brief Summary

Primary Objective To substantiate the efficacy of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® for the treatment of pain related to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs. Secondary Objectives

  • To substantiate the efficacy of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® for the treatment of stiffness and improvement of joint function in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs and with OA of the knee.
  • To substantiate safety and tolerability of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs and with OA of the knee.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 20, 2015

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 2, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2016

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 20, 2015

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

OsteoarthritisPainNSAIDSequessome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • WOMAC pain score

    Change from baseline to final visit of the average of the WOMAC pain subscale scores

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGIC)

    3 months

  • WOMAC function score

    3 months

  • WOMAC stiffness score

    3 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Adverse Events (AE)

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Test Product

EXPERIMENTAL

2.2 g FLEXISEQ® twice daily

Device: FLEXISEQ®

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

2.2 g placebo twice daily

Device: Placebo

Interventions

applicable gel

Test Product
PlaceboDEVICE

applicable gel

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed and dated informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure
  • Willing and able to comply with study requirements
  • Outpatients with an age ≥ 50 (starting from the day after the 50th birthday)
  • Patient for whom their knee pain is the worst pain in the body and is able to identify the predominantly painful (target) knee
  • Patient has a primary diagnosis of Functional Class I-III OA of the target knee and patient meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical classification criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee
  • NSAID contraindicated or clinically intolerant
  • Females able to conceive (including peri-menopausal women who have had a menstrual period within 1 year) must be using appropriate birth control (defined as a method which results in a low failure rate
  • If female and able to conceive, patient has a negative urine pregnancy test at screening

You may not qualify if:

  • Planned treatment or treatment with another investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomisation
  • Patients who are inmates of psychiatric wards, prisons, or other state institutions
  • Investigator or any other team member involved directly or indirectly in the conduct of the clinical study
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Any planned or expected hospitalisation within the study period
  • Patients not able to perform the WOMAC test (physically handicapped or immobile patient, e.g. wheel-chair bound)
  • Skin lesions or dermatological diseases in the treatment area
  • Extreme obesity (BMI \> 35)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Requiring dialysis
  • Hepatocellular insufficiency preventing use of paracetamol
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Intolerance to paracetamol
  • Malignancy within the past 2 years
  • Morbus Meulengracht/Gilbert Syndrome
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IMR-Site #1-30

Gräfelfing, Bavaria, 82166, Germany

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Bolten W, Cevc G, Rother M. A multicentre, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of topical ketoprofen in Transfersome gel (IDEA-033) with ketoprofen-free vehicle (TDT 064) and oral celecoxib for knee pain associated with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Jul;52(7):1303-12. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket133. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

    PMID: 23542612BACKGROUND
  • Rother M, Conaghan PG. A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial in moderate osteoarthritis knee pain comparing topical ketoprofen gel with ketoprofen-free gel. J Rheumatol. 2013 Oct;40(10):1742-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130192. Epub 2013 Sep 1.

    PMID: 23996292BACKGROUND
  • Kneer W, Rother M, Mazgareanu S, Seidel EJ; European IDEA-033 study group. A 12-week randomized study of topical therapy with three dosages of ketoprofen in Transfersome(R) gel (IDEA-033) compared with the ketoprofen-free vehicle (TDT 064), in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Pain Res. 2013 Oct 25;6:743-53. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S51054. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24187510BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OsteoarthritisPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Matthias Rother, MD

    International Medical Research - Partner GmbH

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2015

First Posted

November 2, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2016

Last Updated

February 3, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-02

Locations