The Effect of Activity Feedback Enabled by Smart Watches During In-patient Stroke Rehabilitation
An International Randomized Clinical Trial of Activity Feedback During In-patient Stroke Rehabilitation Enabled by Smart Watches
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The amount of activity completed by individuals within rehabilitation programs, even when units are well staffed, is often far below that required for optimal stroke rehabilitation, and is not individually adapted on a day-to-day basis. Daily feedback on their activity levels may motivate stroke survivors to engage in greater skills practice and thus outcome after stroke. To date only a few trials suggests that augmented feedback may be effective. There is a need for a large pragmatic trial to explore the impact of augmented activity feedback on top of their standard care. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of augmented activity feedback by smart watches to support in-patient stroke rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedApril 21, 2017
March 1, 2017
2.3 years
September 30, 2015
April 20, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in activity counts as measured by a triaxial accelerometer from a smart watch from admission to 3 weeks or discharge from rehabilitation
Baseline, Three weeks or at discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Activity goal attainment as measured and provided by the smart watch
At three weeks, or discharge if sooner
Change in walking mobility
Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner
Fatigue
Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner
Health status on EQ-5D-5L
Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner, and 12 weeks (by telephone)
Change in functional mobility as measured by Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI)
Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner, and 12 weeks (by telephone)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Feedback against tailored target
EXPERIMENTALFor each two hour epoch, the watch calculate the level of activity for the same epoch the day before, and adds 5% as the new target to be achieved.
No Feedback
SHAM COMPARATORFor participants assigned to the control group, the smart watch will not provide any activity feedback against a target; it simply shows which two hour epoch a person is in.
Interventions
Participants will wear a smart watch every weekday for nine hours during in-patient rehabilitation to monitor activity levels while receiving their usual care. In the active group, the watch will summate activity movement in two hour epochs and the target for the day for that epoch is the activity in the same epoch 24 hours earlier, plus 5%. During an epoch the patient is shown progress towards the target at at the end of an epoch, they will see their final process towards target for that epoch.
Participants will wear a smart watch every weekday for nine hours during in-patient rehabilitation to monitor activity levels while receiving their usual care. However the watch face will simply show which epoch a person is in. The watch will collect the activity in exactly the same way over the day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Admission for acute/sub-acute in-patient neurorehabilitation of a first stroke at the 2nd affiliated hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Medicine and Acupuncture, Hefei, China.
- Time from onset of stroke to admission for rehabilitation \<16 weeks.
- Ability to follow a two stage command; pick up an object, put object on table.
- Independent in mobility prior to admission. Subjects can use any type of assistive device and brace needed.
- Able to understand and repeat information related to the Informed Consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Admission for second stroke.
- Subjects who are unable to provide consent due to a cognitive impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The 2nd Affiliated Hospital to Anhui University of Tranditional Chinese Medicine
Hefei, Anhui, China
Related Publications (2)
Lawrie S, Dong Y, Steins D, Xia Z, Esser P, Sun S, Li F, Amor JD, James C, Izadi H, Cao Y, Wade D, Mayo N, Dawes H; Smart Watch Activity Feedback Trial Committee (SWAFT). Evaluation of a smartwatch-based intervention providing feedback of daily activity within a research-naive stroke ward: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Oct 6;4:157. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0345-x. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30323946DERIVEDDong Y, Steins D, Sun S, Li F, Amor JD, James CJ, Xia Z, Dawes H, Izadi H, Cao Y, Wade DT; Smart watch activity feedback trial committee (SWAFT). Does feedback on daily activity level from a Smart watch during inpatient stroke rehabilitation increase physical activity levels? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2476-z.
PMID: 29523170DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derick T Wade, MD
Oxford Brookes University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patients wear identical watches; one gives no feedback on activity levels and one gives feedback on a two-hourly basis, with progress against a target derived from activity 24 hours earlier.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Neurological Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2015
First Posted
October 27, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 21, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03