Comparing Ways to Freeze the Nerve That Provides Thigh Sensation
A Comparison Between Ultrasound- and Neurostimulation-Guided Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block
1 other identifier
interventional
21
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background The sensation on the outside of portion of our thighs is provided by a nerve called the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). The investigators can inject freezing around the nerve to reduce the feeling around the thigh (i.e. anesthesia). Anesthesia, or freezing, of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve can reduce pain for patients having A) hip and knee surgery \[1,2\], B) removal of a skin graft \[3\], and C) wound care. In addition, damage to the LFCN (i.e. Meralgia Paresthetica) has been associated with body armour and gun belt use in military and police personnel \[4\]. Although generally a benign condition, compression or injury to this nerve can be painful and require treatment. In addition, the actual variability in sensory distribution for this nerve has not been elucidated in a topographical fashion and will be measured in this study. Finding the most efficient and effective method for anesthesia of the LFCN can improve and positively impact the quality of pain control for patients. Ultrasound has improved the accuracy and efficiency of various other regional anesthesia techniques, and could also impact the safety. Therefore the investigators hypothesize that ultrasound guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block using the subinguinal technique will be statistically more efficacious and efficient when compare to neurostimulation based blockade.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 15, 2017
CompletedSeptember 15, 2017
September 1, 2017
3 months
October 14, 2015
July 18, 2017
September 14, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anesthesia Related Time
The main outcome will be the total anesthesia-related time, defined as the sum of performance and onset times
less than 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Success Rate
less than 30 minutes
Needle Pass
less than 30 minutes
Pain With Procedure
less than 30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Nerve Stimulation- Xylocaine injection
EXPERIMENTALAnesthesia of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve using local anesthetic will be randomly assigned on the right or left side to receive nerve stimulation-xylocaine or ultrasound guided -xylocaine injections in all patients. One patient will therefore have both nerve stimulation AND ultrasound guided injections, only the side of the injection will be randomly assigned to one of the two modalities. Once one technique has been used to freeze one side, the other side will be frozen using the other technique.
Ultrasound guided Xylocaine injection
EXPERIMENTALAnesthesia of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve using local anesthetic will be randomly assigned on the right or left side to receive nerve stimulation-xylocaine or ultrasound guided -xylocaine injections in all patients. One patient will therefore have both nerve stimulation AND ultrasound guided injections, only the side of the injection will be randomly assigned to one of the two modalities. Once one technique has been used to freeze one side, the other side will be frozen using the other technique.
Interventions
For the neurostimulation nerve injection technique, the initial puncture site will be located medial to the anterosuperior iliac spine, just caudal to the inguinal ligament \[7\]. The 22-gauge insulated needle will be connected to a stimulator set at a current of 1.5 mA, a pulse width of 300 ms and a frequency of 2 Hz. A paresthesia referred to the lateral aspect of the thigh at a minimal stimulatory threshold of 0.6 mA (0.3ms) will be sought prior to the injection of local anesthetic \[7\]. A total of 5cc of 2%Xylocaine will be injected for the nerve injection/anesthesia.
For the ultrasound nerve injection group, after skin disinfection, the inguinal region of patients will be scanned using a high-frequency (6 to 13 MHz) linear array transducer covered with a sterile plastic cover. An ultrasound image showing the inguinal ligament and anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) will be obtained. Using an out-of-plane technique, a 22-gauge nerve block needle will be inserted 1-2 cm medial to ASIS. The needle will be advanced until its tip rests under the inguinal ligament, immediately ventral to the iliopsoas muscle \[6\]. A total of 5cc of 2%Xylocaine will be injected for the nerve injection/anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- male and female between 18 and 60 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- adults who are unable to give their own consent
- pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination) -
- coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
- renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
- hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
- allergy to local anesthetic agents local anesthetic
- pregnancy based on patient self report of last menstrual cycle. If a patient wish/insist on participating in the study, and pregnancy status is unclear, a urine pregnancy test will be offered. Also risk of Lidocaine in pregnancy will be discussed with the patient as currently classified. We will convey that this risk is currently classified as a Risk Class B, which means that animal-reproduction studies have not demonstrated a fetal risk but there are no controlled studies in pregnant women. We will also discuss that animal-reproduction studies have shown an decrease in maternal fertility), but that was not confirmed in controlled studies in women in the first trimester and there is no evidence of a risk in later trimesters,
- prior surgery in the hip and lateral leg region
- prior lumbar surgery
- previous pelvic fracture
- previous L1, L2 or L3 lumbar radiculopathy, plexopathy or meralgia paresthetica
- chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (9)
Kim JH, Cho MR, Kim SO, Kim JE, Lee DK, Roh WS. A comparison of femoral/sciatic nerve block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and combined spinal epidural anesthesia for total knee replacement arthroplasty. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 May;62(5):448-53. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.5.448. Epub 2012 May 24.
PMID: 22679542BACKGROUNDCapdevila X, Biboulet P, Bouregba M, Rubenovitch J, Jaber S. Bilateral continuous 3-in-1 nerve blockade for postoperative pain relief after bilateral femoral shaft surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1998 Nov;10(7):606-9. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(98)00097-x.
PMID: 9805704BACKGROUNDShteynberg A, Riina LH, Glickman LT, Meringolo JN, Simpson RL. Ultrasound guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block: safe and simple anesthesia for harvesting skin grafts. Burns. 2013 Feb;39(1):146-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 May 30.
PMID: 22657583BACKGROUNDFargo MV, Konitzer LN. Meralgia paresthetica due to body armor wear in U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq: a case report and review of the literature. Mil Med. 2007 Jun;172(6):663-5. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.6.663.
PMID: 17615854BACKGROUNDFowler IM, Tucker AA, Mendez RJ. Treatment of meralgia paresthetica with ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency ablation of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):394-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00522.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
PMID: 22151457BACKGROUNDHara K, Sakura S, Shido A. Ultrasound-guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block: comparison of two techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Jan;39(1):69-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900111.
PMID: 21375093BACKGROUNDShannon J, Lang SA, Yip RW, Gerard M. Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block revisited. A nerve stimulator technique. Reg Anesth. 1995 Mar-Apr;20(2):100-4.
PMID: 7605755BACKGROUNDStan TC, Krantz MA, Solomon DL, Poulos JG, Chaouki K. The incidence of neurovascular complications following axillary brachial plexus block using a transarterial approach. A prospective study of 1,000 consecutive patients. Reg Anesth. 1995 Nov-Dec;20(6):486-92.
PMID: 8608066BACKGROUNDCorujo A, Franco CD, Williams JM. The sensory territory of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh as determined by anatomic dissections and ultrasound-guided blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):561-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318261c8b6.
PMID: 22878522BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gaurav Gupta
- Organization
- CF
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gaurav Gupta, MD
CF Health Centre Ottawa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD FRCPC
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2015
First Posted
October 16, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 15, 2017
Results First Posted
September 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share