NCT02576704

Brief Summary

Myocardial perfusion imaging is an efficient tool to assess the risk of major cardiac events for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. If the test is normal, or if the abnormalities of perfusion represent less than 10% of the left ventricle myocardium, the patient is considered at low risk and should be managed with optimal medical treatment only. Recently, new gamma cameras using semi-conductor detectors have been developed. Their diagnostic performances have been demonstrated and confronted with various anatomical and functional reference techniques, such as coronary angiography and FFR. The prognostic value of a normal SPECT MPI has not been specifically assessed yet. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD) has been demonstrated to be an early marker of coronary artery disease (CAD). Preliminary data suggest that myocardial perfusion heterogeneity (a potential surrogate marker of endothelial dysfunction) can be assessed on conventional MP-SPECT, but its additive and independent prognostic value over the presence of myocardial ischemia remain unknown. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is :

  • To assess the prognostic value of a normal myocardial perfusion stress imaging using a semiconductor gamma camera with a dual isotope high speed protocol,
  • To evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion heterogeneity assessed by a new automatized image processing method, in normal SPECT MPIs. The main hypothesis is that the presence of myocardial perfusion heterogeneity is predictive of cardiovascular events in patients referred to the Nuclear Cardiology Department for routine evaluation of known or suspected CAD.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,119

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2011

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2011

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 15, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 4, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

October 13, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 2, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite primary outcome

    number of cardiac death or nonfatal Myocardial Infarction

    3 years

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • first composite secondary outcome

    3 years

  • secondary composite secondary outcome

    3 years

  • third composite secondary outcome

    3 years

  • fourth composite secondary outcome

    3 years

  • fifth composite secondary outcome

    3 years

Interventions

we use a new mathematic technique from entropy analysis to provide precise, objective, automated quantification of perfusion heterogeneity at stress with camera SPECT. This method may be a non-invasive imaging to assess coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study cohort Patient referred to the Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory of the University Hospital of Grenoble for myocardial perfusion imaging for diagnosis or prognosis evaluation of suspected or know coronary artery disease, whose myocardial stress imaging was normal or with Summed stress score (SSS) \< or = 4.

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 years
  • Clinical indication for myocardial perfusion imaging

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding women
  • Myocardial perfusion abnormalities with SSS \> 4

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chu Grenoble

Grenoble, Isere, 38043, France

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Verma S, Buchanan MR, Anderson TJ. Endothelial function testing as a biomarker of vascular disease. Circulation. 2003 Oct 28;108(17):2054-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089191.72957.ED. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14581384BACKGROUND
  • Schindler TH, Nitzsche EU, Schelbert HR, Olschewski M, Sayre J, Mix M, Brink I, Zhang XL, Kreissl M, Magosaki N, Just H, Solzbach U. Positron emission tomography-measured abnormal responses of myocardial blood flow to sympathetic stimulation are associated with the risk of developing cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 3;45(9):1505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.040.

    PMID: 15862426BACKGROUND
  • Johnson NP, Gould KL. Clinical evaluation of a new concept: resting myocardial perfusion heterogeneity quantified by markovian analysis of PET identifies coronary microvascular dysfunction and early atherosclerosis in 1,034 subjects. J Nucl Med. 2005 Sep;46(9):1427-37.

    PMID: 16157524BACKGROUND
  • Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2900-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072790.23090.41. Epub 2003 May 27.

    PMID: 12771008BACKGROUND
  • Barone-Rochette G, Leclere M, Calizzano A, Vautrin E, Celine GC, Broisat A, Ghezzi C, Baguet JP, Machecourt J, Vanzetto G, Fagret D. Stress thallium-201/rest technetium-99m sequential dual-isotope high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging validation versus invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(3):513-22. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0016-0. Epub 2014 Nov 8.

    PMID: 25381092BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2015

First Posted

October 15, 2015

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

January 4, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Locations