Study Stopped
No enrollment in study.
Acute Mechanical Response to Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy
AAD and CRT
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine if anti-arrhythmic drugs with a sodium channel-blocking mechanism exert a detrimental electromechanical effect on cardiac function in patients depending upon baseline intraventricular conduction and left ventricular function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2018
CompletedJune 28, 2018
June 1, 2018
2.4 years
June 16, 2015
June 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in QRS duration
the QRS waveform measurements will be calculated on the EKG prior to and after the procainamide infusion
baseline and 1 hour post infusion
changes in left ventricular volumes as measured via echocardiogram
the left ventricular volume will be calculated via echocardiogram pre and post procainamide infusion
baseline and 1 hour post infusion
changes in ejection fraction as measured via echocardiogram
ejection fraction will be calculated via echocardiogram pre and post procainamide infusion.
baseline and 1hour post infusion
changes in RV-LV electrical activation (in CRT patients)
The RV-LV electrical activation will be assessed during the device interrogation pre and post procainamide infusion.
baseline and 1 hour post infusion
Study Arms (1)
observational
EXPERIMENTALAll patients will undergo 12-lead ECG and transthoracic echocardiography on the day of the study. These studies will be performed on patients as their previously implanted device is reprogrammed to pace in different modes. Patients will then receive an infusion of procainamide (12 mg/kg up to a maximum of 1 g) at a rate of 20 mg/min. Repeat ECG and echocardiograms will then be performed. The patient's device will be programmed to a specific setting before and after the procainamide infusion.
Interventions
the procainamide will be infused at 12mcg/kg up to a max of 1 gram at a rate of 20mg/min which will take up to 1 hour to infuse
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Implanted cardiac device requiring generator change and a new device
- Able to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Current membrane-active anti-arrhythmic
- Glomerular filtration rate (GRF)\<30 milliliters (mL)/min
- MAP\<60 mmHg
- Known intolerance to procainamide
- Pregnancy
- Age \<18 or \>85 years old
- Baseline QT interval \>480 ms (500 ms if paced)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Evan Adelstein, MDlead
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Evan Adelstein
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (7)
Connolly SJ, Camm AJ, Halperin JL, Joyner C, Alings M, Amerena J, Atar D, Avezum A, Blomstrom P, Borggrefe M, Budaj A, Chen SA, Ching CK, Commerford P, Dans A, Davy JM, Delacretaz E, Di Pasquale G, Diaz R, Dorian P, Flaker G, Golitsyn S, Gonzalez-Hermosillo A, Granger CB, Heidbuchel H, Kautzner J, Kim JS, Lanas F, Lewis BS, Merino JL, Morillo C, Murin J, Narasimhan C, Paolasso E, Parkhomenko A, Peters NS, Sim KH, Stiles MK, Tanomsup S, Toivonen L, Tomcsanyi J, Torp-Pedersen C, Tse HF, Vardas P, Vinereanu D, Xavier D, Zhu J, Zhu JR, Baret-Cormel L, Weinling E, Staiger C, Yusuf S, Chrolavicius S, Afzal R, Hohnloser SH; PALLAS Investigators. Dronedarone in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 15;365(24):2268-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109867. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
PMID: 22082198RESULTPacker DL, Prutkin JM, Hellkamp AS, Mitchell LB, Bernstein RC, Wood F, Boehmer JP, Carlson MD, Frantz RP, McNulty SE, Rogers JG, Anderson J, Johnson GW, Walsh MN, Poole JE, Mark DB, Lee KL, Bardy GH. Impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, amiodarone, and placebo on the mode of death in stable patients with heart failure: analysis from the sudden cardiac death in heart failure trial. Circulation. 2009 Dec 1;120(22):2170-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.853689. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
PMID: 19917887RESULTEcht DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, Arensberg D, Baker A, Friedman L, Greene HL, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 21;324(12):781-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103213241201.
PMID: 1900101RESULTCardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial II Investigators. Effect of the antiarrhythmic agent moricizine on survival after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 23;327(4):227-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207233270403.
PMID: 1377359RESULTCairns JA, Connolly SJ, Roberts R, Gent M. Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT. Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial Investigators. Lancet. 1997 Mar 8;349(9053):675-82. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)08171-8.
PMID: 9078198RESULTJulian DG, Camm AJ, Frangin G, Janse MJ, Munoz A, Schwartz PJ, Simon P. Randomised trial of effect of amiodarone on mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after recent myocardial infarction: EMIAT. European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial Investigators. Lancet. 1997 Mar 8;349(9053):667-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09145-3.
PMID: 9078197RESULTConnolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Gent M, Bailin S, Fain ES, Thorpe K, Champagne J, Talajic M, Coutu B, Gronefeld GC, Hohnloser SH; Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Investigators. Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.165.
PMID: 16403928RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Evan Adelstein, MD
University of Pittsburgh
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Evan Adelstein, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2015
First Posted
October 14, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 27, 2018
Study Completion
February 27, 2018
Last Updated
June 28, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06