NCT02574104

Brief Summary

Complex service interventions are neither smooth nor easy in any transitioning healthcare facility. Simulations performed in the new environment reinforce patient safety by uncovering safety threats, enabling their correction, and orienting hospital staff. This study expands upon patient safety successes at several institutions to measurably enhance patient safety at upcoming new inpatient facilities.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2014

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 7, 2015

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 12, 2015

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

October 7, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 4, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalPatient simulationInterdisciplinary CommunicationHuman factorsHazard Analysis and Critical Control Points

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cumulative Latent Safety Threats (LST) discovered

    LSTs are discovered during simulations, documented during debriefings, fed back to workflow committees for corrective action, and solutions may be retested in subsequent simulations

    Two months leading up to transition

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Average change in system readiness

    Baseline (12-8 weeks prior to move), post-TESTPILOT (6-4 weeks prior), post-workshop (10 days prior) and post-transition (4-8 weeks post)

  • Average change in staff preparedness

    Baseline (12-8 weeks prior to move), post-TESTPILOT (6-4 weeks prior), post-workshop (10 days prior) and post-transition (4-8 weeks post)

  • Qualitative review of successes and challenges

    90 minute focus group discussion three months after transition

Study Arms (15)

Institution 1

McGill University Health Center NICU staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Complete

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 2

Rochester University Medical Center NICU staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Complete

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 3

Parkland Memorial Hospital NICU Staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Complete

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 4

Eastern Maine Medical Center NICU Staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Active

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 5

Brigham and Women's Hospital NICU Staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Active

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 6

Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine NICU Staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Active

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 7

Golisano Children's Hospital of Southwest Florida NICU Staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Preparing

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 8

Florida Hospital for Children NICU Staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Preparing

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 9

Memorial Hospital of South Bend NICU Staff Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition STATUS: Pending

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 10

recruiting Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 11

recruiting Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 12

recruiting Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 13

recruiting Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 14

recruiting Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Institution 15

recruiting Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients to preserve safety at transition

Other: Simulate a functional NICU prior to moving patients

Interventions

Test translation of care paradigms in the new environment a priori. Invest significant time and resources into scenario design, staffing, preparing and orchestration the simulations. 80-160 staff participate in simulations, discover and resolve latent safety threats

Institution 1Institution 10Institution 11Institution 12Institution 13Institution 14Institution 15Institution 2Institution 3Institution 4Institution 5Institution 6Institution 7Institution 8Institution 9

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Institutions building a new single family room or hybrid Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

You may qualify if:

  • NICUs transitioning during the study period will be recruited.
  • Active NICU staff at each institution will be encouraged to participate without regard to age, gender, race, pregnancy or health status.
  • The participants will be a representative sample of the overall staff, which includes primarily women in most NICUs.

You may not qualify if:

  • Institutions unable to commit resources for simulation preparation, latent safety threat correction, or study reporting requirements

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Women & Infants Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Bender J, Shields R, Kennally K. Transportable enhanced simulation technologies for pre-implementation limited operations testing: neonatal intensive care unit. Simul Healthc. 2011 Aug;6(4):204-12. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182183c0b.

    PMID: 21546863BACKGROUND
  • Kobayashi L, Shapiro MJ, Sucov A, Woolard R, Boss RM 3rd, Dunbar J, Sciamacco R, Karpik K, Jay G. Portable advanced medical simulation for new emergency department testing and orientation. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;13(6):691-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.01.023. Epub 2006 Apr 24.

    PMID: 16636356BACKGROUND
  • Kaji AH, Bair A, Okuda Y, Kobayashi L, Khare R, Vozenilek J. Defining systems expertise: effective simulation at the organizational level--implications for patient safety, disaster surge capacity, and facilitating the systems interface. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1098-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00209.x. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

    PMID: 18717649BACKGROUND
  • Villamaria FJ, Pliego JF, Wehbe-Janek H, Coker N, Rajab MH, Sibbitt S, Ogden PE, Musick K, Browning JL, Hays-Grudo J. Using simulation to orient code blue teams to a new hospital facility. Simul Healthc. 2008 Winter;3(4):209-16. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31818187f3.

    PMID: 19088665BACKGROUND
  • Bender GJ. In situ simulation for systems testing in newly constructed perinatal facilities. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Apr;35(2):80-3. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01.007.

    PMID: 21440815BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Jesse Bender, MD

    Women & Infants Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Megan Hennessey-Green, CRA

CONTACT

Andrea Pacheco-Medeiros

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Neonatologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2015

First Posted

October 12, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 1, 2018

Last Updated

November 7, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Summary level data will be made available to other researchers

Locations