Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Difficult Airway Situations
Comparison of Three Different Supraglottic Airway Devices and Endotracheal Intubation in Pediatric Difficult Airway Situations in a Manikin
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare three supraglottic airway devices (Combitube, Easytube, laryngeal mask airway) to endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway scenario in a pediatric manikin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 16, 2018
August 1, 2018
1.2 years
October 6, 2015
August 15, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to successful ventilation
1 min
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Success rate
1 min
Rating of the device (questionnaire)
1 min
Re-assessment of success rate after 3 months
3 months
Re-assessment of time to successful ventilation after 3 months
3 months
Study Arms (1)
Combitube, Easytube, Laryngeal masks
EXPERIMENTALCombitube, Easytube, Laryngeal mask airway are intubated in pediatric airway manikins by probands in randomized order.
Interventions
Supraglottic airway device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pediatricians
- residents
- interns
- written informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Michael Frass, Prof. Dr.
Medical University of Vienna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Univ.Prof.Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2015
First Posted
October 8, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08