Study Stopped
Low enrollment, short stay; lacked statistically powered evaluation for efficacy.
Clinical Study to Assess a New Barrier Film's Ability to Provide Skin Protection Against Incontinence & Allow Healing
Multi-Center, Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy of 3M™ Cavilon™ Advanced Barrier Film for the Treatment of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis to a Commercially Available Moisture Barrier
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational product (3M™ Cavilon™ Advanced High Endurance Skin Protectant) for the treatment of incontinence associated dermatitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 23, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 12, 2018
CompletedOctober 2, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.7 years
October 6, 2015
October 30, 2017
September 30, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline to End of Study in Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD) Scores
Primary endpoint was percent decrease in Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD) score from baseline to end of subject's participation. A negative value indicates increased IAD score; a positive value indicates decreased IAD score. IAD scores were calculated for 6 anatomical zones for color, presence of lesions, and skin loss using 3M's Skin Condition Assessment Tool. Skin condition assessed for 1) epidermal loss depth \& area involved; 2) skin color intact skin \& % area if not normal color. Intensity scored based on % area involved. Epidermal loss intensity rating scores ranged from 0 (none) - 4 (76-100%) partial (skin open, not weeping) or complete (skin open \& weeping). Color of intact skin rating scores ranged from 0 (skin color normal) - 4 (76-100%) skin color pink or red. Scores for each of the 6 body zones were combined to obtain a single IAD score for each subject. IAD scores ranged from 0 (best) - 720 (worst).
up to 21 days depending on length of hospitalization
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Re-epithelialization to a Category 1 or Lower
Up to 21 days depending on length of hospitalization
Pain Scores During Incontinence Management
Up to 21 days depending on length of hospitalization
Prevention of IAD.
Measured at study day 5
Study Arms (2)
Cavilon Advanced Skin Protectant
EXPERIMENTALProduct applicator contains liquid barrier applied on buttocks/thighs with it drying rapidly to durable barrier film. It's applied 3x/per week.
ConvaTec Sensi-Care Protective Barrier
ACTIVE COMPARATORMarketed product applied following manufacturer's recommendation. The product is 15% zinc oxide with petrolatum.
Interventions
The liquid barrier film flows from the applicator and dries quickly on the skin. It is durable for 72-96 hours under conditions of incontinence.
Sensi-Care is commercial paste product applied to protect denuded and weeping skin from incontinence.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects may be enrolled into this study if the answers to all these questions are yes.
- Is the subject a full-term newborn (36 weeks or greater gestational age) or older?
- Is the subject in a facility providing nursing care 24 hours per day?
- Does the subject have severe Category 2 Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD) -red with skin breakdown (i.e. skin erosion and denudation or denudation of skin alone)?
- Is the subject willing to have photos taken of their skin exposed to incontinence and permit use of photographs in potential publication?
- Is the subject willing to release rights to 3M for the use of the photos?
- Is there a reasonable expectation that the subject will remain in a facility for at least 7 days following enrollment in the study?
- Has the subject, or their legally authorized representative, signed an Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent/assent document and authorized the use and disclosure of protected health information?
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects are excluded from participation in this study if any of the answers to these following questions is yes.
- If female, is the subject pregnant or breast feeding or has she given birth within the 3 weeks preceding the screening visit?
- Does the subject have a known allergy to acrylates or cyanoacrylates?
- Does the subject have a Stage III, IV, unstageable, suspected deep tissue injury pressure ulcer in the area where the skin is affected by incontinence?
- Does the subject have a preexisting skin disease on the areas affected by incontinence that may make skin assessments for this study difficult?
- Does the skin area affected by incontinence require treatment with a concomitant medication or product?
- Does the subject have an active genital herpes infection?
- Has the subject received antifungal powders in the area affected with IAD within 24 hours prior to enrollment?
- Has the subject received cyanoacrylate based skin protectant (such as Marathon) within 72 hours prior to enrollment?
- Is the facility unwilling to discontinue use for this subject of Dimethicone-containing wipes on the area where the skin protectant product will be applied?
- Is the facility unwilling to discontinue use for this subject of Chlorhexidine Gluconate wipes on the area where the skin protectant product will be applied?
- Does the subject have any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator should exclude him/her from participating in the study?
- Has the subject been enrolled in any investigational study where product was applied to proposed study sites within 30 days of the screening visit?
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Solventum US LLClead
- 3Mcollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Children's Hospitals and Clinic
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
Children's Hospital and Clinics
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102, United States
Good Samaritan
Kearney, Nebraska, 68848, United States
St. Elizabeth
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 76010, United States
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Lennox Hill
New York, New York, 10075, United States
St. John
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104, United States
Roper St. Francis
Charleston, South Carolina, 29401, United States
Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anne Swearingen, Manager, Clinical Operations
- Organization
- 3M Critical and Chronic Care Solutions Division
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pat Parks, MD
3M
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2015
First Posted
October 7, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 23, 2017
Study Completion
June 23, 2017
Last Updated
October 2, 2024
Results First Posted
October 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share