Safety and Efficacy of Restylane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane Lidocaine for Facial Augmentation in Asian Population
An Open, Evaluator-blinded, Non-comparative, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Restylane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane Lidocaine for Facial Augmentation in Asian Population
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Restylane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane Lidocaine after the first and second treatment when used for facial augmentation in Asian population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 3, 2019
CompletedAugust 26, 2022
September 1, 2019
1.1 years
September 23, 2015
September 10, 2019
August 24, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Improved in "Global Facial Aesthetic Appearance" - Judged by Participant
Number of improved participants according to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) 6 months after initial treatment. The GAIS is a qualitative 5-graded scale evaluating aesthetic improvement: Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse. A participant is considered "improved" if she answers Very much improved, Much improved, or Improved.
6 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants Improved in Nasolabial Fold Severity (Merz Aesthetic Scale) - Judged by Investigator
6 and 12 Months after first and second treatment, respectively
Percentage of Participants Improved in Upper Cheek Fullness - Judged by Investigator
6 and 12 Months after first and second treatment, respectively
Study Arms (1)
Intradermal injection
EXPERIMENTALRestylane and/or Perlane
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects intent to undergo facial filler treatment for either volume loss or contouring
- Subjects requiring treatment in two to four of pre-defined areas in the face (upper cheeks, nasolabial folds, temples, nose and chin)
- Require 3-5 ml of investigational products to achieve a clinically meaningful improvement in appearance
- Facial appearance as Han Chinese
- Non-pregnant, non-breast feeding female
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous facial surgery (e.g. rhinoplasty) or permanent implant in the area to be treated.
- History of chronic sinusitis or rhinitis (only applicable for subjects injected in the nose).
- Subjects who needs to use heavy glasses during the study (only applicable for subjects injected in the nose).
- Previous tissue augmenting therapy or contouring with permanent filler or fat injection in the facial area.
- Previous treatment with Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers or Restylane Skinboosters in the facial area within 12 months before treatment.
- Previous treatment with non-HA fillers such as CaHA (Calcium Hydroxylapatite) or PLLA (Poly L-Lactic Acid) within 24 months before treatment.
- Previous revitalization with neurotoxin in the facial area within six (6) months before treatment.
- Previous tissue revitalization treatment with laser or light, mesotherapy, chemical peeling or dermabrasion in the facial area within six (6) months before treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (2)
Galderma Research Site
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Galderma Research Site
Taipei, Taiwan
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- Q-Med AB
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Q-Med AB
Galderma R&D
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2015
First Posted
October 1, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 29, 2016
Study Completion
September 28, 2018
Last Updated
August 26, 2022
Results First Posted
October 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share