NCT02565199

Brief Summary

The goal of the study is to determine the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the premotor cortex on training-related improvements in motor performance and associated neural plasticity.

Trial Health

33
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Trial recruitment is currently suspended
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
suspended

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 29, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2015

Completed
8.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8.4 years

First QC Date

September 29, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 14, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in wrist acceleration

    The subjects will be asked to perform 7 isometric wrist extensions before and after motor training. Wrist acceleration will be measured by a gyroscope taped to the dorsum of the subject's hand undergoing motor training. An increase in the maximum acceleration that persists at least an hour after training is indicative of motor learning. We will compare the effect of the rTMS protocols on the change in the wrist acceleration associated with motor learning (baseline to post 1 min, baseline to post 30 mins, baseline to post 60 mins).

    Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)

  • Change in stimulus response curve (SRC)

    The stimulus response curve (SRC) is a set of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) collected in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses of increasing intensities. The SRC can characterize input-output parameters of the corticospinal tract and organization of the primary motor cortex. A change in the SRC parameters after training will reflect a change in the organization of the primary motor cortex associated with motor learning. We will compare the effect of the rTMS protocols on the change in the SRC parameters associated with motor learning (baseline to post 1 min, baseline to post 30 mins, baseline to post 60 mins).

    Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)

  • Change in short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI)

    Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is an inhibitory phenomenon in the motor cortex. To test for SICI, a sub-threshold conditioning stimulus (CS) will precede a supra-threshold test stimulus (TS) by 2 milliseconds (ms). The amplitude of a conditioned TS-evoked MEP will be expressed as a percent of the amplitude of an unconditioned TS-evoked MEP. A decrease in the percent MEP after training would indicate a increase in SICI. An increase in the percent MEP after training would indicate a decrease in SICI. We will compare the effect of the rTMS protocols on the change in SICI associated with motor learning (baseline to post 1 min, baseline to post 30 mins, baseline to post 60 mins).

    Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in wrist force

    Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)

  • Change in reaction time

    Baseline and post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)

  • Change in task accuracy

    Baseline and post-motor training (1 minute after completion of motor training)

Study Arms (2)

Single motor training only

EXPERIMENTAL

For a pilot experiment, healthy, right-handed subjects will complete one testing session. During the testing session, subjects will complete motor training. The results of this experiment will determine the motor training protocol used in the main experiment.

Other: Motor Training

Repetitive TMS during motor training

EXPERIMENTAL

Healthy, right-handed subjects will complete five testing sessions. During each testing session, subjects will complete motor training while receiving one of five repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols. Subjects will receive a different rTMS protocol at each testing session. By the end of the study, each subject will have received all rTMS protocols.

Device: rTMS over Premotor Cortex (Contralateral Hemisphere)Device: rTMS over Premotor Cortex (Ipsilateral Hemisphere)Device: rTMS (Control 1)Device: rTMS (Control 2)Device: rTMS (Control 3)Other: Motor Training

Interventions

* Location of rTMS: premotor cortex * Frequency of rTMS: 0.1 Hz * Time of rTMS: 50 milliseconds before the onset of movement-related EMG * Device: MagStim Super Rapid 2 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

Repetitive TMS during motor training

* Location of rTMS: premotor cortex * Frequency of rTMS: 0.1 Hz * Time of rTMS: 50 milliseconds before the onset of movement-related EMG * Device: Super Rapid 2 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

Repetitive TMS during motor training

* Location of rTMS: premotor cortex * Frequency of rTMS: 0.1 Hz * Time of rTMS: 400 milliseconds after the onset of movement-related EMG * Device: Super Rapid 2 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

Repetitive TMS during motor training

* Location of rTMS: somatosensory cortex * Frequency of rTMS: 0.1 Hz * Time of rTMS: 50 milliseconds before the onset of movement-related EMG * Device: Super Rapid 2 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

Repetitive TMS during motor training

* Location of rTMS: premotor cortex * Frequency of rTMS: 0.1 Hz * Time of rTMS: 50 milliseconds before the onset of movement-related EMG * Device: Super Rapid 2 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator with Sham Coil

Repetitive TMS during motor training

During motor training, participants will quickly extend their hand at a pace of one extension every 5 seconds (0.2Hz) in response to an auditory cue.

Repetitive TMS during motor trainingSingle motor training only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Motor training only (pilot participants):
  • Have the ability to give informed, written consent
  • Be aged 18-80 years old
  • Be right-handed using the Edinburgh handedness inventory
  • Have intact cognitive abilities (score higher than 75th percentile on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS))
  • No current depression (score less than 7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS))
  • No neurological disease
  • No contradictions to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
  • TMS over the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) hotspot must evoke a motor evoked potential (MEP) in the ECU muscle
  • MEP amplitude must increase by at least 20% as the TMS intensity increases
  • The subjects must be comfortable when receiving TMS of all strengths.
  • Remaining study participants:
  • Have the ability to give informed, written consent
  • Be aged 55-80 years old
  • Be right-handed using the Edinburgh handedness inventory
  • +7 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Impaired cognitive abilities (score lesser than 75th percentile on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS))
  • Current depression (score more than 7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS))
  • Neurological disease
  • Has a contradiction to TMS
  • MEP cannot be evoked with TMS in the ECU muscle
  • Inability to tolerate one or more TMS strengths

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2015

First Posted

October 1, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

February 1, 2024

Study Completion

February 1, 2024

Last Updated

August 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Locations