Indocyanine Green Versus Blue Dye for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Node In Endometrial Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine the difference in the proportion of hemipelves with successful detection of Sentinel Lymph Node according to the dye used (indocyanine green with near-infrared imaging vs blue dye) in women with endometrial cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 25, 2018
June 1, 2016
1.2 years
September 29, 2015
January 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the difference in the proportion of hemipelves with successful detection of SLN according to the dye used
at time of surgery
Study Arms (2)
Indocyanine Green on the right side
EXPERIMENTALIndocyanine Green will be injected on the right side of the cervix and Methylene blue on the left side of the cervix.
Methylene Blue on the right side
EXPERIMENTALMethylene blue will be injected on the right side of the cervix and Indocyanine Green on the left side of the cervix.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all patients with endometrial carcinoma proven by endometrial biopsy or curettage AND
- preoperative FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I AND
- intended for staging via laparoscopic or robotic surgery AND
- Patients must be older than 18 year-old, able to read French or English.
You may not qualify if:
- preoperative FIGO stages II to IV
- previous pelvic or paraaortic lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy
- surgery that could change the uterine lymphatic drainage (myomectomy)
- iodine allergy
- pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montréal Hôpital Saint Luc
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1987 Oct 15;60(8 Suppl):2035-41. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+3.0.co;2-8.
PMID: 3652025RESULTAbu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A, Lev G, Sonoda Y, Aghajanian C, Chi DS, Barakat RR. The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov;103(2):714-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.055. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
PMID: 16740298RESULTDankert J, Bouma J. Recurrent acute leg cellulitis after hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Aug;94(8):788-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03728.x.
PMID: 3663535RESULTQuerleu D, Leblanc E, Cartron G, Narducci F, Ferron G, Martel P. Audit of preoperative and early complications of laparoscopic lymph node dissection in 1000 gynecologic cancer patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.043. Epub 2006 May 3.
PMID: 16677594RESULTBarlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, Leitao MM Jr, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Alektiar K, DeLair DF, Barakat RR, Abu-Rustum NR. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22366409RESULTDesai PH, Hughes P, Tobias DH, Tchabo N, Heller PB, Dise C, Slomovitz BM. Accuracy of robotic sentinel lymph node detection (RSLND) for patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Nov;135(2):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
PMID: 25175452RESULTCormier B, Rozenholc AT, Gotlieb W, Plante M, Giede C; Communities of Practice (CoP) Group of Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC). Sentinel lymph node procedure in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and proposal for standardization of future research. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Aug;138(2):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.039. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
PMID: 26047592RESULTBallester M, Dubernard G, Lecuru F, Heitz D, Mathevet P, Marret H, Querleu D, Golfier F, Leblanc E, Rouzier R, Darai E. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):469-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70070-5. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
PMID: 21489874RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Béatrice Cormier, MD
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2015
First Posted
September 30, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2016-06