Stress and Mental Ill-health in the Workplace: Evaluation of an Intervention for the Prevention of Sick Leave
Preventing Sickness Absenteeism Among Employees With Common Mental Disorders and Stress-related Symptoms: a Cluster Randomized Trial of a Problem-solving Based Intervention Versus Care-as-usual Conducted at the Occupational Health Services
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose Common mental disorders (CMD:s) are the leading cause of sick-leave spells in Sweden, resulting in suffering for the individual and financial costs for the employer as well as for society at large. Studies on interventions that address stress and mental ill-health and that focus on sick leave and return to work (RTW) show little or no effect of commonly used methods such as medication or psychological approaches. Furthermore, these interventions often focus on the individual's symptoms without considering their work situation. The occupational health services (OHS) has knowledge of the employee's work environment and can offer treatment facilitating the employee's RTW and improving the employee's work ability while taking into account both the individual and the work situation. The intervention in the current study will be performed at the OHS. The study aim is two-fold: first, an intervention that addresses both individual and workplace related aspects among employees with work-related CMD:s and/or stress related symptoms will be evaluated. In particular, the treatment's cost-effectiveness and impact on sick leave and mental health will be studied. Secondly, the concerned OHS staff's adherence to the intended treatment and associations with the outcome of the intervention will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2020
CompletedSeptember 13, 2021
September 1, 2021
2.8 years
September 21, 2015
September 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in total registered sickness absenteeism during the 12 month follow-up period.
(1) Total sick leave in days, register data (sickness benefit and disability pension). Sickness benefit and disability pension will also be analyzed separately. The analyses will be repeated for outcomes on registered sick leave at a three-years follow-up
At baseline and 12 months after baseline.
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Change from baseline in self-reported sickness absenteeism during the 12 months follow-up period
At baseline and during monthly follow-ups for a period of 12 months
The prevalence of no sick leave, part-time sick leave and full-time sick leave during the 12 months follow-up period following baseline
Twelve months after baseline
Among those sick listed at baseline: Time to full Return to Work (RTW) during a follow-up period of 12 months
At baseline and during monthly follow-ups for a period of 12 months
Among those sick listed at baseline: Time to Return to Work (RTW) during a follow-up period of 12 months
At baseline and during monthly follow-ups for a period of 12 months
Work performance impairment due to health problems
Will be assessed at baseline and once a month during a 12-month follow-up period
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Problem-solving based intervention
EXPERIMENTALProblem-solving based intervention with a participative approach. During the intervention a systematic assessment of the match between the employee and the work environment is considered. The intervention applies a participatory approach where the supervisor and the employee are guided by the OHS consultant and encouraged to actively take part in problem solving concerning the work situation. The intervention consists of three meetings, one between the OHS consultant and a representative for the employer (usually the nearest supervisor), one between the consultant and the employee and then a third meeting where all three parties participate.
Treatment as usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control intervention consists of the usual interventions given at the participating OHS. These interventions are also work-directed and usually also include participation of both the employee and the supervisor. However, structured problem solving methods and the systematic consideration of the match between the employee and the job situation are not applied. The content of the control condition will vary between different occupational health service units.
Interventions
The intervention comprises both the employee and the employer, and follows a clear structure comprising problem solving, stepwise activation and relapse prevention. It includes three meetings at the OHS with additional follow-ups.
Study participants that are randomized into the control group will receive the usual care given at the OHS. This intervention will differ due to differences between the OHS units.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The employee suffers from stress related symptoms or work-related common mental disorders.
- The employee is either not on sick leave or is on sick leave for a maximum of 3 consecutive months (full or part time).
- The employee understands both written and spoken Swedish.
- The employees nearest supervisor should be aware of the employees visit(s) at the OHS (to avoid differential selection into the experimental and the control condition)
You may not qualify if:
- Bullying
- Pregnancy
- Post traumatic stress-disorder
- Severe mental disorders (e.g. psychosis)
- Any co-morbidity that may substantially affect the employee's ability to work and/or quality of life.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, 14141, Sweden
Related Publications (4)
Bergstrom G, Lohela-Karlsson M, Kwak L, Bodin L, Jensen I, Torgen M, Nybergh L. Preventing sickness absenteeism among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: Design of a cluster randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving based intervention versus care-as-usual conducted at the Occupational Health Services. BMC Public Health. 2017 May 12;17(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4329-1.
PMID: 28494753BACKGROUNDKeus van de Poll M, Nybergh L, Lornudd C, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Kwak L, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Torgen M, Bergstrom G. Preventing sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a problem-solving-based intervention conducted by the Occupational Health Services. Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jul;77(7):454-461. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106353. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
PMID: 32291291BACKGROUNDKeus Van De Poll M, Bergstrom G, Jensen I, Nybergh L, Kwak L, Lornudd C, Lohela-Karlsson M. Cost-Effectiveness of a Problem-Solving Intervention Aimed to Prevent Sickness Absence among Employees with Common Mental Disorders or Occupational Stress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;17(14):5234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145234.
PMID: 32698470BACKGROUNDToropova A, Bjork Bramberg E, Bergstrom G. Return to Work Trajectories of Swedish Employees on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Sep;35(3):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10216-9. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
PMID: 38907784DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gunnar Bergström, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2015
First Posted
September 30, 2015
Study Start
August 25, 2015
Primary Completion
May 30, 2018
Study Completion
May 30, 2020
Last Updated
September 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09