NCT02559206

Brief Summary

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and dose response of two delayed release formulations of linaclotide (DR; DR formulation 1 is DR1; DR formulation 2 is DR2) administered orally to patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). Additional objectives include understanding how the two DR formulations compare with each other and with the FDA-approved 290 μg LINZESS® (the immediate release \[IR\] formulation of linaclotide).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
759

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

71 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 22, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2015

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 22, 2015

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2016

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 24, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

September 22, 2015

Results QC Date

April 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo

    Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.

    Baseline, up to Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo

    Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.

    Baseline, up to Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo

    A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.

    Baseline, up to Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo

    A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.

    Baseline, up to Week 12

  • Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo

    A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.

    up to Week 12

  • Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo

    A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.

    up to Week 12

Study Arms (8)

30 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Linaclotide

100 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Linaclotide

300 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Linaclotide

30 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Linaclotide

100 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Linaclotide

300 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Linaclotide

290 μg linaclotide IR and placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Linaclotide

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Matching Placebo

Interventions

Oral, once daily

100 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo100 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo290 μg linaclotide IR and placebo30 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo30 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo300 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo300 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo

Oral, once daily

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient has completed a colonoscopy according to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) criteria, with no clinically significant findings
  • Patient has no clinically significant findings on a physical examination and clinical laboratory tests
  • Patient meets protocol criteria for diagnosis of IBS-C
  • Patient demonstrates continued IBS-C through Pretreatment Period
  • Patient maintains a minimum level of compliance with daily diary

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient has history of loose or watery stools
  • Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with a medical condition that may contribute to abdominal pain
  • Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
  • Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (71)

Ironwood Investigational Site

Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Phoenix, Arizona, 85018, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Anaheim, California, 92801, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Garden Grove, California, 92843, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

La Mesa, California, 91942, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Newport Beach, California, 92660, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

San Diego, California, 92108, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Thousand Oaks, California, 91360, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80904, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Bristol, Connecticut, 06010, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Kissimmee, Florida, 34744, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Miami, Florida, 33015, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Miami, Florida, 33135, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Miami, Florida, 33165, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Miami, Florida, 33175, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

South Miami, Florida, 33143, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Tampa, Florida, 33634, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Atlanta, Georgia, 30328, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Oakwood, Georgia, 30566, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Evansville, Indiana, 47714, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Bastrop, Louisiana, 71220, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Metairie, Louisiana, 70006, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Wyoming, Michigan, 49519, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Jackson, Mississippi, 39202, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

St Louis, Missouri, 63128-2197, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Bozeman, Montana, 59718, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Brooklyn, New York, 11206, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Concord, North Carolina, 28025, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Davidson, North Carolina, 28036, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Mentor, Ohio, 44060, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Xenia, Ohio, 45385, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, 57049, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Bristol, Tennessee, 37620, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Arlington, Texas, 76012, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Beaumont, Texas, 77001, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

El Paso, Texas, 79905, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Houston, Texas, 77074, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Ogden, Utah, 84405, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Sandy City, Utah, 84094, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Christiansburg, Virginia, 24073, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502, United States

Location

Ironwood Investigational Site

La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Chey WD, Sayuk GS, Bartolini W, Reasner DS, Fox SM, Bochenek W, Boinpally R, Shea E, Tripp K, Borgstein N. Randomized Trial of 2 Delayed-Release Formulations of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):354-361. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000967.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

linaclotide

Results Point of Contact

Title
Nick Omniewski, MPH
Organization
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Paul Chamberlin, MD

    Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2015

First Posted

September 24, 2015

Study Start

October 22, 2015

Primary Completion

September 30, 2016

Study Completion

September 30, 2016

Last Updated

April 24, 2020

Results First Posted

April 24, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Locations