Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)
A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-range-finding Study of Two Delayed Release Formulations of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
1 other identifier
interventional
759
1 country
71
Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and dose response of two delayed release formulations of linaclotide (DR; DR formulation 1 is DR1; DR formulation 2 is DR2) administered orally to patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). Additional objectives include understanding how the two DR formulations compare with each other and with the FDA-approved 290 μg LINZESS® (the immediate release \[IR\] formulation of linaclotide).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
71 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 22, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 24, 2020
CompletedApril 24, 2020
April 1, 2020
11 months
September 22, 2015
April 9, 2020
April 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo
Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.
Baseline, up to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo
Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.
Baseline, up to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo
A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.
Baseline, up to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo
A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.
Baseline, up to Week 12
Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo
A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.
up to Week 12
Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo
A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.
up to Week 12
Study Arms (8)
30 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo
EXPERIMENTAL100 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo
EXPERIMENTAL300 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo
EXPERIMENTAL30 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo
EXPERIMENTAL100 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo
EXPERIMENTAL300 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo
EXPERIMENTAL290 μg linaclotide IR and placebo
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Oral, once daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has completed a colonoscopy according to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) criteria, with no clinically significant findings
- Patient has no clinically significant findings on a physical examination and clinical laboratory tests
- Patient meets protocol criteria for diagnosis of IBS-C
- Patient demonstrates continued IBS-C through Pretreatment Period
- Patient maintains a minimum level of compliance with daily diary
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has history of loose or watery stools
- Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with a medical condition that may contribute to abdominal pain
- Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
- Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.lead
- Forest Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (71)
Ironwood Investigational Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Garden Grove, California, 92843, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
La Mesa, California, 91942, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, 92660, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92108, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80904, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Kissimmee, Florida, 34744, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33015, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33135, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33165, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33175, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
South Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33634, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Oakwood, Georgia, 30566, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bastrop, Louisiana, 71220, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Wyoming, Michigan, 49519, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128-2197, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bozeman, Montana, 59718, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11206, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Concord, North Carolina, 28025, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Davidson, North Carolina, 28036, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Mentor, Ohio, 44060, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Xenia, Ohio, 45385, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, 57049, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Arlington, Texas, 76012, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Beaumont, Texas, 77001, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
El Paso, Texas, 79905, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77074, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Ogden, Utah, 84405, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Sandy City, Utah, 84094, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Christiansburg, Virginia, 24073, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601, United States
Related Publications (1)
Chey WD, Sayuk GS, Bartolini W, Reasner DS, Fox SM, Bochenek W, Boinpally R, Shea E, Tripp K, Borgstein N. Randomized Trial of 2 Delayed-Release Formulations of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):354-361. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000967.
PMID: 33065589DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nick Omniewski, MPH
- Organization
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Paul Chamberlin, MD
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2015
First Posted
September 24, 2015
Study Start
October 22, 2015
Primary Completion
September 30, 2016
Study Completion
September 30, 2016
Last Updated
April 24, 2020
Results First Posted
April 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04