Assessment of Tender & Swollen Joints Count Score Performed by a Rheumatologist And Rheumatology Nurses in Patients With RA and PsA.
APRAN
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will establish a comparison in follow-up care of 100 patients between Health Care Practitioners, more specifically the rheumatologist and a trained nurse. The study objective is to show consistency of evaluation between two different health care professionals, a physician and a nurse.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2018
CompletedFebruary 1, 2019
January 1, 2019
3.2 years
September 15, 2015
January 31, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of the nurse CDAI result compared to the rheumatologist CDAI result.
To validate the accuracy of assessment of RA and PsA disease activity by a nurse trained in joint examination using the CDAI as compared to a rheumatologist's same assessment. The level of agreement between evaluators will be investigated using Cohen's Kappa, a statistic tool useful to the measurement of inter-rater agreement for qualitative traits.
6 months
Accuracy of the nurse DAS-28 result compared to the rheumatologist DAS-28 result.
To validate the accuracy of assessment of RA and PsA disease activity by a nurse trained in joint examination using the DAS-28 as compared to a rheumatologist's same assessment. The level of agreement between evaluators will be investigated using Cohen's Kappa, a statistic tool useful to the measurement of inter-rater agreement for qualitative traits.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Comparison of TJC results between 3 raters.
6 months
Comparison of SJC results between 3 raters.
6 months
Comparison of VAS results between 3 raters.
6 months
Comparison of time taken by 3 raters to perform disease assessments.
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Disease evaluation
Rheumatoid arthritis evaluations.
Interventions
Patients will complete a self-evaluation of 28 joint counts for swelling and tenderness and assess their disease activity on a Visual Analog Scale. A 28 joint count and VAS will then be assessed by a nurse and by a rheumatologist. The same rheumatologist will examine all patients and two nurses will each randomly assess half the total enrolled patients. The nurse will be blinded to the patient's joint count and VAS, and similarly, the rheumatologist will be blinded to both the patient and nurse's assessments.
Eligibility Criteria
The target population will be subjects with active Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis.
You may qualify if:
- Subject is ≥18 years of age.
- Has at least one of the following diagnosis at screening
- Subject has a diagnosis of RA as defined by the 1987- revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR)- classification criteria for RA and has disease duration of more than 6 months.
- Subject must have a diagnosis of active PsA by Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) and has disease duration of more than 6 months.
- The subject must be able to provide written informed consent and to complete the study questionnaires.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject with DIP involvement in PsA
- Subject with predominant axial symptoms (spondyloarthropathy)
- Subject with fibromyalgia
- Subject involved in a concomitant study
- Subject currently takes ≥10 mg cortisone daily
- Subject has taken opioid analgesics within 12 hours of joint count assessment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Isabelle Fortinlead
- Janssen Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre de Rhumatologie de L'Est Du Quebec
Rimouski, Quebec, G5L 8W1, Canada
Related Publications (14)
Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Breedveld FC, Boumpas D, Burmester G, Combe B, Cutolo M, de Wit M, Dougados M, Emery P, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Haraoui B, Kalden J, Keystone EC, Kvien TK, McInnes I, Martin-Mola E, Montecucco C, Schoels M, van der Heijde D; T2T Expert Committee. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Apr;69(4):631-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.123919. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
PMID: 20215140RESULTAtar D, Birkeland KI, Uhlig T. 'Treat to target': moving targets from hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes to rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Apr;69(4):629-30. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.128462. No abstract available.
PMID: 20237122RESULTAnderson J, Caplan L, Yazdany J, Robbins ML, Neogi T, Michaud K, Saag KG, O'Dell JR, Kazi S. Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 May;64(5):640-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.21649.
PMID: 22473918RESULTScott IC, Scott DL. Joint counts in inflammatory arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Sep-Oct;32(5 Suppl 85):S-7-12. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
PMID: 25365082RESULTRadner H, Grisar J, Smolen JS, Stamm T, Aletaha D. Value of self-performed joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis patients near remission. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Mar 14;14(2):R61. doi: 10.1186/ar3777.
PMID: 22417647RESULTCheung PP, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gossec L, Paternotte S, Le Bourlout C, Mazieres M, Dougados M. Reliability of patient self-evaluation of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison study with ultrasonography, physician, and nurse assessments. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Aug;62(8):1112-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.20178.
PMID: 20235213RESULTTillett W, Shaddick G, Korendowych E, de Vries CS, McHugh N. Joint count reliability in psoriatic arthritis observational trials--an unreported problem. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jul;51(7):1333-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes095. Epub 2012 May 4. No abstract available.
PMID: 22562935RESULTJanta I, Naredo E, Martinez-Estupinan L, Nieto JC, De la Torre I, Valor L, Estopinan L, Bello N, Hinojosa M, Gonzalez CM, Lopez-Longo J, Monteagudo I, Montoro M, Carreno L. Patient self-assessment and physician's assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity: which is more realistic in remission status? A comparison with ultrasonography. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Dec;52(12):2243-50. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket297. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
PMID: 24046468RESULTBarton JL, Criswell LA, Kaiser R, Chen YH, Schillinger D. Systematic review and metaanalysis of patient self-report versus trained assessor joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2009 Dec;36(12):2635-41. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090569. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
PMID: 19918045RESULTLevy G, Cheetham C, Cheatwood A, Burchette R. Validation of patient-reported joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis and the role of training. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jun;34(6):1261-5. Epub 2007 Apr 15.
PMID: 17444590RESULTCheung PP, Dougados M, Andre V, Balandraud N, Chales G, Chary-Valckenaere I, Dernis E, Gill G, Gilson M, Guis S, Mouterde G, Pavy S, Pouyol F, Marhadour T, Richette P, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Soubrier M, Nguyen M, Gossec L. The learning curve of nurses for the assessment of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2014 Mar;81(2):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
PMID: 23928236RESULTFarragher TM, Lunt M, Plant D, Bunn DK, Barton A, Symmons DP. Benefit of early treatment in inflammatory polyarthritis patients with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies versus those without antibodies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):664-75. doi: 10.1002/acr.20207.
PMID: 20461787RESULTPincus T, Segurado OG. Most visits of most patients with rheumatoid arthritis to most rheumatologists do not include a formal quantitative joint count. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jun;65(6):820-2. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.044230. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
PMID: 16291813RESULTCheung PP, Gossec L, Mak A, March L. Reliability of joint count assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Jun;43(6):721-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
PMID: 24332117RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
NABIL CHAKER, BIOLOGIST
CENTRE DE RHUMATOLOGIE DE L'EST DU QUEBEC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ISABELLE FORTIN, MD
CENTRE DE RHUMATOLOGIE DE L'EST DU QUEBEC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
FRÉDÉRIC BANVILLE, Ph.D
Université de Montréal
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Rheumatologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2015
First Posted
September 22, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 16, 2018
Study Completion
November 16, 2018
Last Updated
February 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01