Early Non-invasive Detection of CTEPH After Pulmonary Embolism
InShape2
1 other identifier
observational
424
3 countries
5
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, international, multicenter outcome cohort study. This study starts at the moment patients visit the outpatient clinic 3 to 6 months after a diagnosis of acute PE as part of routine medical care. If patients consent to study participation, the CTEPH clinical prediction score will be calculated. CTEPH is considered to be not present in patients with a low probability (≤6 points) and no symptoms suggestive of CTEPH, i.e. dyspnea on exertion, edema, newly developed palpitations, syncope or chest pains.The remaining patients with either high probability (\>6 points) or who report symptoms that may be associated with CTEPH will be subjected to the 'rule-out criteria'. CTEPH will be assumed not present in patients with an age- and gender dependent normal NT-proBNP level (as defined by the assay's manufacturer), in the absence of any of the 3 ECG criteria. Patients who have an abnormal result from the 'rule-out criteria' will be referred for transthoracic echocardiography. All echocardiograms will be performed according to a predefined standardized protocol. In case of echocardiographic intermediate or high probability of PH, patients will be referred for further diagnostic work-up of suspected CTEPH starting with perfusion lung scan or VQ-scan and right heart catheterization, of which the results will be discussed by an independent interdisciplinary working group of PH specialists, to ensure optimal diagnostic management. This latter diagnostic work-up of an abnormal echocardiograph lies within the setting of standard medical care. All patients who were not diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension of any origin, or with NYHA class III or IV heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions, will be followed for a total of 2 years from the index PE diagnosis. During that period, the study protocol will not interfere with standard patient care, allowing diagnostic tests as deemed indicated by the treating physician including echocardiography in case of new respiratory symptoms. At the end of the follow-up period, all patients will be subjected to a second echocardiography that will be handled according to the above stated procedures to evaluate the presence of CTEPH.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 9, 2021
February 1, 2021
3.8 years
September 15, 2015
February 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The accuracy of the screening algorithm to detect CTEPH, as reflected by the 2-year incidence of confirmed CTEPH in patients in whom CTEPH was initially considered not present based on the 'risk stratification score' and the 'rule out criteria'.
The primairy endpoint is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a CTEPH screening program based on the 'risk stratification score' and the 'rule out criteria'.
2-year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The cumulative incidence and incidence rate of CTEPH in the total study population with corresponding 95% confidence interval
2-year follow-up
Feasibility of the screening algorithm, the number of necessary echocardiograms at baseline and the number of relevant echocardiographic findings at baseline, i.e. those that require treatment
2-year follow-up
3 Cost-effectiveness of the screening algorithm: a study-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA: diagnostic costs per early CTEPH diagnosis) and a model-based cost-utility analysis (CUA: societal costs per QALY).
2-year follow-up
incremental diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiographically derived ECG-vectoranalysis on top of the manual ECG assessment by comparing the c-statistics and reclassification numbers between the manually and automatically assessed ECG parameters
2-year follow-up
Inter-observer variability in the measurement of the RV/LV ratio on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) expressed as the kappa-value of the ventricular dimension measurements by two independent researchers.
2-year follow-up
Study Arms (1)
outcome cohort study
'prediction score' and 'rule-out criteria'
Interventions
The combination of the 'prediction score' and the 'rule-out criteria' constitutes an accurate follow-up after PE aimed at diagnosing CTEPH in early stages.
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive patients treated for objectivated symptomatic acute PE
You may qualify if:
- All patients with an objectivated first or recurrent diagnosis of symptomatic acute PE, who have been treated for at least three months with therapeutically dosed anticoagulant therapy according to current guidelines;
- Signed and dated informed consent of the subject available before the start of any specific study procedures;
- Age ≥18 years;
You may not qualify if:
- Known CTEPH or PH;
- Known (i.e. echocardiographic confirmed) NYHA class III or IV chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions;
- Severe renal failure (eGFR \<15 ml/min) or renal replacement therapy;
- Medical or psychological condition that would not permit completion of the study or signing of informed consent, including life expectancy less than six months, or unwillingness to sign informed consent;
- Non-compliance or inability to adhere to treatment or to the follow-up visits.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
VUmc
Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
LUMC
Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands
Haga
The Hague, 2545 CH, Netherlands
medical university of Warsaw
Warsaw, Poland
Related Publications (3)
Klok FA, Tesche C, Rappold L, Dellas C, Hasenfuss G, Huisman MV, Konstantinides S, Lankeit M. External validation of a simple non-invasive algorithm to rule out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2015 May;135(5):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
PMID: 25746363RESULTKlok FA, Surie S, Kempf T, Eikenboom J, van Straalen JP, van Kralingen KW, van Dijk AP, Vliegen HW, Bresser P, Wollert KC, Huisman MV. A simple non-invasive diagnostic algorithm for ruling out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2011 Jul;128(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
PMID: 21450333RESULTFabyan KD, Holley AB. Postpulmonary embolism syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2021 Sep 1;27(5):335-341. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000789.
PMID: 34127618DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
F.A. Klok, MD PhD
Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis LUMC Leiden
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2015
First Posted
September 21, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share