Locomotor Adaptation Training to Prevent Mobility Disability
Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions for Mobility Impairment in Parkinson's Disease
2 other identifiers
observational
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an exploratory study designed to investigate the effects of aerobic dual belt treadmill walking versus traditional treadmill exercise on gait performance and functional capacity in older adults at risk for mobility disability. Identifying the relationship between aerobic treadmill exercise (dual belt or traditional) and the recovery of walking abilities will serve to optimize current rehabilitation approaches.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 17, 2019
CompletedJuly 22, 2019
July 1, 2019
9 years
September 17, 2015
July 19, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Gait Speed
Gait speed will be determined from kinematic and kinetic measurement methods. A low value would indicate a slower walking speed compared to a higher value (faster walking speed).
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in temporal variability
Temporal will be determined from kinematic and kinetic measurement methods. Lower values correspond to better walking performance.
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in spatial variability
Spatial will be determined from kinematic and kinetic measurement methods. Lower values correspond to better walking performance.
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in physical performance
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in cognitive impairment
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in Cognitive impairment of executive function
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in Disability
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
Change in likelihood of falling
baseline and up to 6 weeks following the intervention
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Dual-belt Exercise
The participants assigned to this group will use the dual-belt treadmill 3 times a week for 16 weeks.
Treadmill Exercise
The participants assigned to this group will use the treadmill 3 times a week for 16 weeks.
Usual Care
The participants assigned to this group will not use the treadmills.
Interventions
The dual-belted exercise treadmill can control the speeds of the right and left legs individually. When asymmetric, the dual-belt treadmill imposes mechanical and sensory perturbations independently to each leg such that the central nervous system (CNS) must solve and adapt to the challenge to maintain walking.
The treadmill exercise will maintain the speed of the right and left leg together while walking.
This group will not be assigned to a treadmill but is as a non-exercising control group.
Eligibility Criteria
Older adults with sedentary lifestyle willing to be be randomized to and treatment groups.
You may qualify if:
- Age 65 and older
- Gait Speed of ≤ 1m/s
- Summary score 7-10 on the Short Physical Performance Battery, indicating mild to moderate impairment
- Sedentary as defined by reporting \<20 min/wk of performing regular physical activity in the past month and \<125 min/wk of moderate physical activity on the CHAMPS-18 questionnaire
- Willingness to be randomized to any of the treatment groups
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to provide informed consent
- Planned surgery in next year
- Hospitalization within the past 6 months
- Smoker \> 1 pack per day
- Significant cognitive impairment, defined as a known diagnosis of dementia or a Modified Mini-Mental State score \<24
- Significant cognitive executive impairment, defined as a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of\<25
- Progressive, degenerative neurologic disease, e.g., Parkinson's Disease, multiple sclerosis, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
- Severe rheumatologic or orthopedic diseases, e.g., awaiting joint replacement, active inflammatory disease
- Terminal illness with life expectancy less than 12 mos, as determined by a physician
- Severe pulmonary disease, requiring either steroid pills or injections or the use of supplemental oxygen
- Severe cardiac disease, including New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, history of cardiac arrest, use of a cardiac defibrillator, or uncontrolled angina;
- Other significant co-morbid disease that would impair ability to participate in the exercise-based intervention, e.g. renal failure on hemodialysis, severe psychiatric disorder (e.g. bipolar, schizophrenia), excessive alcohol use (\>14 drinks per wk); persons with depression will not be excluded
- Develops chest pain or severe shortness of breath during exercise test
- Unable to communicate because of severe hearing loss or speech disorder or language barrier
- Lives outside of the study site or is planning to move out of the area in next year or leave the area for \>1 month during the next year
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Floridalead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chris J Hass, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2015
First Posted
September 18, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 17, 2019
Study Completion
July 17, 2019
Last Updated
July 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07