NCT02554435

Brief Summary

Cardiovascular disease accounts for 1 in 3 deaths among US adults and is strongly related to physical activity. Most older adults do not participate in healthy levels of physical activity. Physical activity promotion and counseling from a primary health care provider is important for disease prevention. In addition to counseling, an activity monitor can increase physical activity through self-regulation. Two types of monitors are available: pedometers and electronic activity monitors (EAMs). Research shows that both monitors are motivational devices that can increase physical activity. Pedometers count steps of the wearer. EAMs can monitor steps, monitor burned calories, quality of sleep, and sedentary time. EAMs may also offer more behavioral change techniques and opportunities for self-monitoring. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of EAMs compared to a pedometer on increasing physical activity and decreasing cardiovascular risk within older adult, primary care patients. The study will include sedentary, overweight primary care patients, 55-74 years of age with access to a smart phone or tablet. All participants will receive brief physical activity counseling. Participants will then be randomized to receive a self-monitoring device (Digi-walker CW-700/701 or UP24 by Jawbone) to wear for 3 months. Investigators will evaluate the following outcomes: physical activity, cardiovascular risk (Framingham risk calculator, fitness), psychological feeling toward exercise, physical function, health status, exercise motivation and self-regulation. The investigators hypothesize that EAMs will be more effective than pedometers in improving these outcomes. The results of this pilot test will aid in the translation of effective physical activity intervention components to primary care clinics for cardiovascular disease prevention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2015

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 18, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 10, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

August 24, 2015

Results QC Date

October 25, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

physical activityactivity monitorolder adults5 A's counseling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Physical Activity Minutes Measured by a SenseWear Armband

    Minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity over a 7 day period

    Physical activity minutes at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • Composite Measure for Cardiovascular Risk Measured by the Framingham Non-laboratory Risk Calculator

    Factors within the risk calculator include of age in years, systolic blood pressure, gender, and body mass index. These factors are used to create a composite score to estimate the individual's risk for a cardiac event within the next 10 years. The risk score is not bound by maximums and minimums, however a lower number is more favorable. Among women, a composite risk score of 10 equates to a 6% risk of a cardiovascular event, a risk score of 15 equates to a 13% risk, a risk score of 20 equates to a 28.5% risk, and a risk score of 21 or higher equates to \>30% risk of a cardiovascular event within the next 10 years. Among men, a composite risk score of 10 equates to a 9% risk, a risk score of 15 equates to a 21.5% risk, and a risk score of 18 or higher equates to \>30% risk of a cardiovascular event within the next 10 years.

    Cardiovascular risk at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • 6-minute Walk Test

    distance walked in 6 minutes

    Fitness at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • Steps Per Day

    Measured by a SenseWear Armband. Average steps per day over a 7 day period

    Steps per day at the end of the 12 week intervention

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Weight

    Weight at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • Body Mass Index (BMI)

    BMI at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • Waist-to-Hip Ratio

    Waist-to-hip ratio at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • Exercise Motivation

    Exercise motivation at the end of the 12 week intervention

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Pedometer

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All participants will be given 5 A's counseling and a digital pedometer (Digi-walker CW-700/701, YAMAX, San Antonio, TX). Participants will be asked to log their daily steps measured by the pedometer in an activity diary.

Behavioral: 5 A's counselingDevice: Pedometer

Electronic Activity Monitor (EAM)

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will be given an EAM (UP24 by Jawbone, San Francisco, CA) and the corresponding UP24 application (app) on their smart device. In addition to monitoring activity, the app allows for social comparison and social interaction. Participants will "friend" other participants to utilize these features.

Device: EAMBehavioral: 5 A's counseling

Interventions

EAMDEVICE

The monitor provides the participant feedback on their daily steps, active time, idle time, burned calories, and distance traveled through the mobile application (app). Participants can review all of their feedback while in the intervention. If the participants chose, they are also able to monitor their sleep and dietary intake. The app also provides health tips and daily challenges. The participants will also have the opportunity to interact with other participants through the social features of the app.

Also known as: UP24, Jawbone, Electronic Activity Monitor
Electronic Activity Monitor (EAM)

Brief counseling to encourage behavioral change. The counseling is intended to be administered by a health care provider. The component of the counseling are assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange.

Electronic Activity Monitor (EAM)Pedometer
PedometerDEVICE

The pedometer provides the participant feedback on their daily steps, activity time, distance traveled, and calories burned. Participants can review the feedback for the past 7 days.

Pedometer

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 74 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • physically inactive (less than 60 minutes per week)
  • BMI between 25-35
  • in good health measured by Par-Q+
  • access to a smart phone

You may not qualify if:

  • physical activity is inadvisable by their doctor
  • involved in another physical activity intervention within the past 6 months
  • used an activity monitor in the past 6 months
  • unwilling to travel for scheduled visits
  • currently taking medications that affect body composition
  • current smoker
  • report alcohol or drug problem
  • institutionalized for psychiatric illness within the last year
  • do not consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Primary Care Pavilion

Galveston, Texas, 77551, United States

Location

Victory Lakes Town Center

League City, Texas, 77573, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Lewis ZH, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Jennings K, Brown AF, Swartz MC, Lyons EJ. Testing Activity Monitors' Effect on Health: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Among Older Primary Care Patients. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Apr 29;5(2):e59. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5454.

    PMID: 27129602BACKGROUND
  • Lewis ZH, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Jennings K, Brown AF, Swartz MC, Martinez E, Lyons EJ. Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186800.

  • Lewis ZH, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Jennings K, Brown AF, Swartz MC, Martinez E, Lyons EJ. The feasibility and RE-AIM evaluation of the TAME health pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 14;14(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0560-5.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Zakkoyya Lewis
Organization
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Study Officials

  • Zakkoyya Lewis, BS

    The University of Texas Medical Branch

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2015

First Posted

September 18, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 20, 2020

Results First Posted

July 10, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Locations