TAME Health: Testing Activity Monitors' Effect on Health
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Cardiovascular disease accounts for 1 in 3 deaths among US adults and is strongly related to physical activity. Most older adults do not participate in healthy levels of physical activity. Physical activity promotion and counseling from a primary health care provider is important for disease prevention. In addition to counseling, an activity monitor can increase physical activity through self-regulation. Two types of monitors are available: pedometers and electronic activity monitors (EAMs). Research shows that both monitors are motivational devices that can increase physical activity. Pedometers count steps of the wearer. EAMs can monitor steps, monitor burned calories, quality of sleep, and sedentary time. EAMs may also offer more behavioral change techniques and opportunities for self-monitoring. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of EAMs compared to a pedometer on increasing physical activity and decreasing cardiovascular risk within older adult, primary care patients. The study will include sedentary, overweight primary care patients, 55-74 years of age with access to a smart phone or tablet. All participants will receive brief physical activity counseling. Participants will then be randomized to receive a self-monitoring device (Digi-walker CW-700/701 or UP24 by Jawbone) to wear for 3 months. Investigators will evaluate the following outcomes: physical activity, cardiovascular risk (Framingham risk calculator, fitness), psychological feeling toward exercise, physical function, health status, exercise motivation and self-regulation. The investigators hypothesize that EAMs will be more effective than pedometers in improving these outcomes. The results of this pilot test will aid in the translation of effective physical activity intervention components to primary care clinics for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 10, 2018
CompletedJuly 20, 2020
May 1, 2018
8 months
August 24, 2015
October 25, 2017
July 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Physical Activity Minutes Measured by a SenseWear Armband
Minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity over a 7 day period
Physical activity minutes at the end of the 12 week intervention
Composite Measure for Cardiovascular Risk Measured by the Framingham Non-laboratory Risk Calculator
Factors within the risk calculator include of age in years, systolic blood pressure, gender, and body mass index. These factors are used to create a composite score to estimate the individual's risk for a cardiac event within the next 10 years. The risk score is not bound by maximums and minimums, however a lower number is more favorable. Among women, a composite risk score of 10 equates to a 6% risk of a cardiovascular event, a risk score of 15 equates to a 13% risk, a risk score of 20 equates to a 28.5% risk, and a risk score of 21 or higher equates to \>30% risk of a cardiovascular event within the next 10 years. Among men, a composite risk score of 10 equates to a 9% risk, a risk score of 15 equates to a 21.5% risk, and a risk score of 18 or higher equates to \>30% risk of a cardiovascular event within the next 10 years.
Cardiovascular risk at the end of the 12 week intervention
6-minute Walk Test
distance walked in 6 minutes
Fitness at the end of the 12 week intervention
Steps Per Day
Measured by a SenseWear Armband. Average steps per day over a 7 day period
Steps per day at the end of the 12 week intervention
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Weight
Weight at the end of the 12 week intervention
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI at the end of the 12 week intervention
Waist-to-Hip Ratio
Waist-to-hip ratio at the end of the 12 week intervention
Blood Pressure
Blood pressure at the end of the 12 week intervention
Exercise Motivation
Exercise motivation at the end of the 12 week intervention
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pedometer
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll participants will be given 5 A's counseling and a digital pedometer (Digi-walker CW-700/701, YAMAX, San Antonio, TX). Participants will be asked to log their daily steps measured by the pedometer in an activity diary.
Electronic Activity Monitor (EAM)
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will be given an EAM (UP24 by Jawbone, San Francisco, CA) and the corresponding UP24 application (app) on their smart device. In addition to monitoring activity, the app allows for social comparison and social interaction. Participants will "friend" other participants to utilize these features.
Interventions
The monitor provides the participant feedback on their daily steps, active time, idle time, burned calories, and distance traveled through the mobile application (app). Participants can review all of their feedback while in the intervention. If the participants chose, they are also able to monitor their sleep and dietary intake. The app also provides health tips and daily challenges. The participants will also have the opportunity to interact with other participants through the social features of the app.
Brief counseling to encourage behavioral change. The counseling is intended to be administered by a health care provider. The component of the counseling are assess, advise, agree, assist, and arrange.
The pedometer provides the participant feedback on their daily steps, activity time, distance traveled, and calories burned. Participants can review the feedback for the past 7 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- physically inactive (less than 60 minutes per week)
- BMI between 25-35
- in good health measured by Par-Q+
- access to a smart phone
You may not qualify if:
- physical activity is inadvisable by their doctor
- involved in another physical activity intervention within the past 6 months
- used an activity monitor in the past 6 months
- unwilling to travel for scheduled visits
- currently taking medications that affect body composition
- current smoker
- report alcohol or drug problem
- institutionalized for psychiatric illness within the last year
- do not consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Primary Care Pavilion
Galveston, Texas, 77551, United States
Victory Lakes Town Center
League City, Texas, 77573, United States
Related Publications (3)
Lewis ZH, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Jennings K, Brown AF, Swartz MC, Lyons EJ. Testing Activity Monitors' Effect on Health: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Among Older Primary Care Patients. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Apr 29;5(2):e59. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5454.
PMID: 27129602BACKGROUNDLewis ZH, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Jennings K, Brown AF, Swartz MC, Martinez E, Lyons EJ. Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186800.
PMID: 32961834DERIVEDLewis ZH, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Jennings K, Brown AF, Swartz MC, Martinez E, Lyons EJ. The feasibility and RE-AIM evaluation of the TAME health pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 14;14(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0560-5.
PMID: 28807041DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Zakkoyya Lewis
- Organization
- California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zakkoyya Lewis, BS
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2015
First Posted
September 18, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 20, 2020
Results First Posted
July 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05