A Open Label, Post Marketing Surveillance Study Following Transfusion of INTERCEPT Platelet Components
PIPER
A Prospective, Open Label, Post Marketing Surveillance Study Following Transfusion of INTERCEPT Platelet Components
1 other identifier
observational
2,291
1 country
15
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, non-randomized sequential cohort, open label, multi-center, non-inferiority, Phase IV surveillance study following transfusion of INTERCEPT PCs. The patient population will be hematology-oncology patients, including those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), expected to require one or more PC transfusions. For each participating center, the study will start with a brief pilot run-in period with a group of at least 5 patients exposed only to conventional PCs. The purpose of this pilot run-in is to evaluate study logistics and data collection methods within each study center. Data from the pilot phase will be included in the data analysis for the treatment comparison. After the pilot run-in period, the study will be conducted in two sequential patient cohorts: 1) the Control cohort during which study patients will receive only conventional PCs, and 2) the INTERCEPT cohort during which patients will receive only INTERCEPT PCs. Patient enrollment at each Center will be monitored to target similar numbers of patients into the Control and Test Cohorts within each center. Centers may enroll Control and Test patients in ratios that vary from 2:1 to 1:2 due to institutional requirements to move rapidly to full INTERCEPT implementation, or due to availability issues with either Test or Control components. Within each Center, patient enrollment will be stratified in four categories: (1) chemotherapy only; and by use of conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in (2) myeloablative conditioning, (3) non-myeloablative conditioning, and (4) reduced intensity using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) criteria. Note time from last chemotherapy treatment to first study transfusion should be no more than 30 days. To ensure both Test and Control cohorts have a similar allocation ratio (±10% per category) among the conditioning regimen strata, enrollment caps will be set for the Test cohorts, hence no Test patients will be enrolled to a stratum once the cap for the given stratum is met. Eligible patients will be enrolled in open Test strata sequentially as long as there is sufficient Test PC inventory available. Enrollment may be delayed for the Test cohort if sufficient inventory of Test PCs is not available.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2021
CompletedFebruary 18, 2022
February 1, 2022
4.8 years
September 11, 2015
February 16, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients requiring treatment-emergent assisted mechanical ventilation during the study observation period.
For the purposes of this study, assisted mechanical ventilation defined as assisted ventilation started after the initiation of the first study PC and can be administered either by intubation or tight fitting mask with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP or BiPAP) ≥ 5 cm H2O, if PEEP or CPAP information is available. Assisted mechanical ventilation is selected as the primary outcome as it provides an objective measure of severe, clinically significant pulmonary injury. Patients will be assessed for the initiation of assisted ventilation within 7 days after each study PC transfusion.
Up to 28 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Time from first study PC transfusion to onset of treatment-emergent assisted mechanical ventilation.
Up to 28 days
AEs occurring within 24 hours after the initiation of a study PC transfusion
Up to 22 days
TR occurring within 24 hours after the initiation of a study PC transfusion.
Up to 22 days
SAEs occurring within 7 days after each study PC transfusion
Up to 28 days
ARDS occurring within 7 days after each study PC transfusion
Up to 28 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control Cohort
During the Control cohort period patients will have study data collected following transfusion with only conventional PCs for up to 21 days of transfusion support, as clinically indicated in a manner that is consistent with the local standard of care.
INTERCEPT Cohort
During the INTERCEPT phase, patients will receive only INTERCEPT PCs and will have study data collected following transfusion for up to 21 days of transfusion support, as clinically indicated in a manner that is consistent with the local standard of care.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with hematology-oncology disorders, including those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), expected to require one or more PC transfusions will be included in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a hematology-oncology disorder expected to require or requiring a transfusion of one or more PCs (time from last chemotherapy treatment to first study transfusion should be 30 days or less).
- Written signed informed consent (unless exemption of individual consent is granted by the center's IRB).
You may not qualify if:
- Documented allergy to psoralens
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States
Yale-New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Beth Israel
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Strong Memorial Hospital
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
East Carolina University Hospital
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834, United States
TriHealth Cancer Institute
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Related Publications (2)
Wheeler AP, Snyder EL, Refaai M, Cohn CS, Poisson J, Fontaine M, Sehl M, Nooka AK, Uhl L, Spinella PC, Fenelus M, Liles D, Coyle T, Becker J, Jeng M, Gehrie EA, Spencer BR, Young P, Johnson A, O'Brien JJ, Schiller GJ, Roback JD, Malynn E, Jackups R, Avecilla ST, Liu K, Bentow S, Varrone J, Benjamin RJ, Corash LM. Acute pulmonary injury in hematology patients supported with pathogen-reduced and conventional platelet components. Blood Adv. 2024 May 14;8(9):2290-2299. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012425.
PMID: 38447116DERIVEDDelaney M, Karam O, Lieberman L, Steffen K, Muszynski JA, Goel R, Bateman ST, Parker RI, Nellis ME, Remy KE; Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding (TAXI-CAB), in collaboration with the Pediatric Critical Care Blood Research Network (BloodNet), and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network. What Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;23(13 Suppl 1 1S):e1-e13. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002854.
PMID: 34989701DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward L Snyder, MD
Yale New Haven Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2015
First Posted
September 15, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2021
Last Updated
February 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02