The Effect of Two Different Endoscopic Entry Techniques on Postoperative Gastrointestinal Function
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine effect of veres needle entry and direct trocar entry on postoperative gastrointestinal functions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 7, 2015
September 1, 2015
6 months
May 24, 2015
September 4, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bowel sound (first bowel sound)
time from surgery to first bowel sound as hours
Postoperative first 72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Gas discharge
Postoperative first 72 hours
Study Arms (2)
veres needle entry arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORVere needle will be used to provide penumoperiteum than postoperative gastrointestinal functions will be compared
direct trocar entry arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORDirect trocar entry will be used to provide penumoperiteum than postoperative gastrointestinal functions will be compared
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Laparoscopic surgery for benign or malignant disease
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with gastrointestinal intervention
- Patients who had undergone previous operations
- Patients with gastrointestinal intervention dysfunction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zeynep Kamil
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Compeau C, McLeod NT, Ternamian A. Laparoscopic entry: a review of Canadian general surgical practice. Can J Surg. 2011 Oct;54(5):315-20. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011210.
PMID: 21774882BACKGROUNDDaskalakis M, Scheffel O, Weiner RA. High flow insufflation for the maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum during bariatric surgery. Obes Facts. 2009;2 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):37-40. doi: 10.1159/000198252. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
PMID: 20124777BACKGROUNDAhmad G, O'Flynn H, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub3.
PMID: 22336819RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2015
First Posted
September 7, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 7, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09