TEAS-induced Analgesia: Dual vs Single Acupoints
TADS
Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Decreases Remifentanil Consumption and Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Radical Mastectomy: Dual Acupoints Versus Single Acupoint in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
153
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation(TEAS) at single acupoint or dual acupoints on opioid consumption and postoperative pain in patients undergoing radical mastectomy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedJune 7, 2018
June 1, 2018
5 months
December 30, 2014
June 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
dose of remifentanil during anesthesia
from start of anesthesia to extubation, on average 2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
time to recall
from end of remifentanil infusion to patient response to verbal command,approximately 10 minutes on average
time to extubation
from end of remifentanil infusion to extubation,approximately 10 minutes on average
incidence of respiratory depression during recovery
from extubation to discharge from post anesthesia care unit, approximately 40 minutes on average
incidence of nausea and vomiting during recovery
from extubation to discharge from post anesthesia care unit, approximately 40 minutes on average
visual analogue scale during recovery
from arriving to discharge from post anesthesia care unit, approximately 30 minutes on average
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
single acupoint
EXPERIMENTALtranscutaneous electric acupoint stimulation is given at bilateral neiguan or 30min before anesthesia induction
double acupoints
EXPERIMENTALtranscutaneous electric acupoint stimulation is given at Danzhong and bilateral neiguan or 30min before anesthesia induction
sham electroacupuncture
EXPERIMENTALelectrode attached but no stimulation
Interventions
electrodes are attached o the skin and electric stimulation is given
electrodes are attached o the skin but no stimulation is given
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged from 18 to 65 yrs
- body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 30 kg/m2
- elective radical mastectomy under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- contradictions to electric stimulation
- difficulties in communication
- histories of general anesthesia, drug or alcohol abuse or addiction
- cardiac dysfunction or severe hypertension, confirmed hepatic dysfunction and renal impairment
- participants recruited into other clinical trials during last three months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xijing Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lize Xiong, MD
Xijing Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- For all patients, electrodes were placed at the bilateral PC6 and RN17 and connected to the Hwato Electric Acupuncture Treatment Instrument. No patients in the study had previous experience of undergoing transcutaneous electrical stimulation treatment. Patients were told that they might or might not feel the electrical stimulation. Interventions were performed by a designated investigator who was not involved in the anaesthesia or the follow-up. The stimulator was placed in an opaque box to blind the surgical team and the anaesthetists to the group allocation.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2014
First Posted
September 7, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06