Comparability and Standardization of Controlled Allergen Challenge Facilities
1 other identifier
interventional
98
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
Allergen challenge facilities have been utilized for many years in clinical drug trials studying onset of action, proof of concept, duration of action, and efficacy. Each facility has somewhat different design characteristics and pollen dispersal technologies. Facilities are located in disparate geographic areas and have populations of participants who are sensitized to allergens unique to that area. Therefore, facilities have operated as single sites with little effort to evaluate facility comparability or to attempt standardization across facilities. The purpose of this study is to compare the two sites and assess whether the sites are able to achieve similar symptom scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 9, 2019
CompletedApril 9, 2019
March 1, 2019
4 months
September 2, 2015
March 6, 2018
March 21, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of TRSS From Baseline Between the EEU and BRC in the Cetirizine 10 mg and Placebo Groups.
Participants recorded their nasal and ocular symptoms at baseline and during the intervention visits. The TRSS is a composite score comprised of 4 nasal (runny nose, sneezing, nasal itch, nasal congestion) and 3 ocular (itchy eyes, watery eyes, red/burning eyes) symptoms. The severity of each individual symptom is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3) and are summed for a maximum TRSS of 21 (0 to 21).The 4-point scale includes a severity score of 0 (None: no sign/symptom is evident), 1 (Mild: Sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 (Moderate: Definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome, but tolerable), 3 (Severe: Sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities during the challenge session. A higher score indicates higher symptom severity.
First treatment visit and second treatment visit.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Comparison of TNSS From Baseline Between the EEU and BRC in the Cetirizine 10 mg and Placebo Groups.
First treatment visit and second treatment visit.
Comparison of TOSS From Baseline Between the EEU and BRC in the Cetirizine 10 mg and Placebo Groups.
First treatment visit and second treatment visit.
Comparison of GRCS From Baseline Between the EEU and BRC in the Cetirizine 10 mg and Placebo Groups.
First treatment visit and second treatment visit.
Comparison of VAS From Baseline Between the EEU and BRC in the Cetirizine 10 mg and Placebo Groups.
First treatment visit and second treatment visit.
Study Arms (2)
cetirizine hydrochloride
OTHERplacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Participants will receive either cetirizine (10mg tablet, orally) or a placebo (sugar pill) at one of the two treatment visits.
Participants will receive either a placebo or cetirizine (10mg tablet, orally) at one of the two treatment visits
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- history of rhinoconjunctivitis during ragweed season for a minimum of 2 years, including the previous 2 ragweed seasons.
- positive skin test to ragweed allergen.
You may not qualify if:
- participant is pregnant, lactating or actively trying to conceive.
- has a history of receiving immunotherapy containing short ragweed within the last 3 years.
- participant has current allergy symptoms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Queen's Universitylead
- Biogenics Research Chamber, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Biogenics Research Chamber
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Anne Ellis
- Organization
- Kingston General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne K Ellis, MD
Queen's University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair, Division of Allergy & Immunology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2015
First Posted
September 7, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 9, 2019
Results First Posted
April 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03