NCT02539875

Brief Summary

Although smoking prevalence is decreasing in Hong Kong, there are still 648,800 daily smokers 10.8% (Census and Statistics Department, 2013) and half will be killed by smoking (Lam, 2012) which accounts for over 7,000 deaths per year (Lam, Ho, Hedley, Mak, \& Peto, 2001). Smoking also accounts for a large amount of medical cost, long-term care and productivity loss of US$688 million (0.6% Hong Kong GDP) (Census \& Statistics Department, 2001; McGhee et al., 2006) . Smoking is a highly addictive behavior and it is difficult for smokers with strong nicotine dependence to quit without assistance. On the other hand, reaching and helping the many smokers who have no intention to quit is a challenge, because they are unlikely to seek professional help from smoking cessation services. The Quit and Win programme provides an opportunity to reach and encourage a large group of smokers to make quit attempt and maintain abstinence. The Quit and Win model posits that smokers participating in the contest will have higher motivation to quit with incentives and better social support (Cahill \& Perera, 2011). Studies have found that such quitting contests or incentive programs appeared to reach a large number of smokers and demonstrated a significantly higher quit rate for the quit and win group than for the control group (Cahill \& Perera, 2008). Smoking cessation services in Hong Kong are under-used with more than half (60.9%) adult daily smokers who had never used smoking cessation services (Census and Statistics Department, 2013). Among these smokers only 9.6% were willing to use the services. Existing services mostly require self-initiation to seek the services but smokers general lack the will power of initiation. Active referral will help overcome the barriers of self-initiation. There is preliminary evidence that active referral of smokers to smoking cessation hotline services may increase likelihood of smoking abstinence at 12-month follow-up compared with no active referrals (Borland et al., 2008). A recent study has also reported that individuals who used the community-based referral were also more likely to quit than those who did not (43.6% vs 15.3%, P\<0.001) (Haas et al., 2015). Therefore, the present study will examine (1) effectiveness of the active referral and AWARD approaches, (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,306

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2015

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 26, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 24, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Effectiveness of quit immediately (QI) and cut down to quit (CDTQ) interventions in achieving smoking abstinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • smoking quit rate change from baseline at 3-month follow-up

    The primary outcomes are self-reported 7-day point prevalence (pp) quit rate at 3 and 6 months among the two groups

    3-month follow-up

  • smoking quit rate change from baseline at 6-month follow-up

    The primary outcomes are self-reported 7-day point prevalence (pp) quit rate

    6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Biochemical validated quit rate

    3-month follow-up

  • Biochemical validated quit rate

    6-month follow-up

  • Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 3-month follow-up

    3-month follow-up

  • Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 6-month follow-up

    6-month follow-up

  • Smoking quit attempt change from baseline at 3-month follow-up

    3-month follow-up

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

AWARD, Brief leaflet, Referral leaflet, active referral

EXPERIMENTAL

AWARD will be delivered to smokers onsite and this includes: Ask about smoking history, Warn about the high risk, Advise to quit as soon as possible and not later than a quit date (which will qualify them for the QTW prizes), Refer smokers to smoking cessation services, and Do it again: to repeat the intervention. Brief innovative leaflet on health warning and smoking cessation. A 2-side color printed A4 leaflet will be designed to systematically cover the most important messages to motivate smoking cessation. A 2-side color printed A4 referral leaflet will be used for motivate and assist the smokers to use the smoking cessation services. the smokers will be active refer to various smoking cessation services in Hong Kong (using the referral leaflet) and motivate the smokers to use the smoking cessation services.

Behavioral: AWARD and brief leaflet/ Referral leaflet and active referral/ Smoking cessation booklet and general advices

AWARD, Brief leaflet

EXPERIMENTAL

AWARD will be delivered to smokers onsite and this includes: Ask about smoking history, Warn about the high risk, Advise to quit as soon as possible and not later than a quit date (which will qualify them for the QTW prizes), Refer smokers to smoking cessation services, and Do it again: to repeat the intervention. Brief innovative leaflet on health warning and smoking cessation. A 2-side color printed A4 leaflet will be designed to systematically cover the most important messages to motivate smoking cessation.

Behavioral: AWARD and brief leaflet/ Referral leaflet and active referral/ Smoking cessation booklet and general advices

Smoking cessation booklet, general advices

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive minimal intervention, including: (1) the 12-page smoking cessation booklet (provided by COSH); (2) very brief, minimal and general smoking cessation advice include: "Please quit smoking for improving health and save money", "Please refer to the booklet for the details about smoking cessation" and "Please call us if you have any enquiry".

Behavioral: AWARD and brief leaflet/ Referral leaflet and active referral/ Smoking cessation booklet and general advices

Interventions

Use AWARD and brief leaflet/ Referral leaflet and active referral/ Smoking cessation booklet and general advices interventions to achieve smoking abstinence

AWARD, Brief leafletAWARD, Brief leaflet, Referral leaflet, active referralSmoking cessation booklet, general advices

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Hong Kong residents aged 18 or above
  • Smoke at least 1 cigarette per day in the past 3 months
  • Able to communicate in Cantonese
  • Exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) 4 ppm or above, assessed by a validated CO smokerlyzer
  • Have Intention to quit

You may not qualify if:

  • Smokers who have difficulties (either physical or cognitive condition) to communicate
  • Currently following other smoking cessation programs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health (COSH)

Hong Kong, China

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Theodoulou A, Fanshawe TR, Leavens E, Theodoulou E, Wu AD, Heath L, Stewart C, Nollen N, Ahluwalia JS, Butler AR, Hajizadeh A, Thomas J, Lindson N, Hartmann-Boyce J. Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.

  • Wang MP, Suen YN, Li WH, Lam CO, Wu SY, Kwong AC, Lai VW, Chan SS, Lam TH. Intervention With Brief Cessation Advice Plus Active Referral for Proactively Recruited Community Smokers: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1790-1797. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5793.

  • Suen YN, Wang MP, Li WH, Kwong AC, Lai VW, Chan SS, Lam TH. Brief advice and active referral for smoking cessation services among community smokers: a study protocol for randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2016 May 11;16:387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3084-z.

Study Officials

  • Man Ping Kelvin Wang, PhD

    The University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2015

First Posted

September 3, 2015

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

April 30, 2016

Study Completion

April 30, 2017

Last Updated

October 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-11

Locations