The REFLECT Trial: Cerebral Protection to Reduce Cerebral Embolic Lesions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
A Randomized Evaluation of the TriGuard Embolic Deflection Device to Reduce the Impact of Cerebral Embolic Lesions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
1 other identifier
interventional
478
4 countries
30
Brief Summary
The Keystone Heart TriGuardâ„¢ HDH is an aortic embolism deflection device intended to reduce the amount of embolic material that may enter the carotid, subclavian, and vertebral arteries during transcatheter heart valve implantation. The objective of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the TriGuardâ„¢ HDH embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), in comparison with an active control group of patients undergoing unprotected TAVI. Subjects with indications for TAVI and who meet study eligibility criteria will be randomized 2:1 to one of two treatment arms: 1) Intervention: Embolic protection device (TriGuardâ„¢) with transcatheter aortic valve implantation or 2) Control: Unprotected transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
30 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 18, 2021
CompletedFebruary 18, 2021
February 1, 2021
2.9 years
August 26, 2015
October 23, 2020
February 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Safety Endpoint - Composite Safety Endpoint Based on MACCE
Combined safety endpoint at 30 days defined according to VARC-2 ("TAVI early safety") as a composite of: 1. All-cause mortality - number of patients that expired 2. All stroke (disabling and non-disabling) - defined by VARC-2 scale 3. Life-threatening or disabled bleeding - BARC bleeding scale - 5 point scale ranging from no bleeding to fatal 4. Acute kidney injury - Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy) 5. Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention 6. Major vascular complication, and 7. Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVI, or SAVR) - number of patients in whom a valve related dysfunction occurred It was pre-specified to combine all participants that received the device in the andomized Intervention and Roll-in Arms/Groups for this Outcome Measure.
30 Days
Primary Efficacy Endpoint
Hierarchical composite efficacy endpt, determined by pair-wise comparisons among subjects according to hierarchy: * mortality or any stroke \[30 days\] * death/stroke time to event analysis by days determine win * stroke at same day the comparison moves to next tier * NIHSS worsening \[2-5 days post\] * Freedom from lesions detected by DW-MRI 2-5 days post * Total volume lesions detected by DW-MRI 2-5 days post Each subj in intervention compared with each subj from control based on hierarchy according to Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method. If Subj A dies or has stroke \&Subj B survives free of stroke to 30 days, Subj B wins(score+1) \&Subj A loses (score-1). Both die or have stroke, patient with later event wins. Both have death/stroke on same day is equilibrium (score 0). Both are alive \& have stroke on same day, comparison moves to next tier. Both stroke-free to 30 days, comparison moves to the next tier. Scores summed to cumulative score for each subj, \&outcomes between groups are compared.
Pre-discharge through 30-days
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALEmbolic Protection with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Control Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without embolic protection
Interventions
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient is a male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age
- The patient meets indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
- The patient is willing to comply with protocol-specified follow-up evaluations
- The patient, or legally authorized representative, has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee (EC).
- Potential Subjects will be excluded if ANY of the following criteria apply:
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via the trans-axillary, trans-subclavian, or trans-aortic route
- Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via the transapical approach due to friable or mobile atherosclerotic plaque in the aortic arch
- Patients with a previously implanted prosthetic aortic valve (i.e., planned valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI))
- Pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 14 days prior to index procedure per site standard test
- Patients with known diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 72 hours preceding the index procedure (according to definition) or AMI \>72 hours preceding the index procedure, in whom Creatine Kinase (CK) and CK-MB have not returned to within normal limits at the time of procedure, or patients who are currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new-onset AMI, such as nitrate-unresponsive prolonged chest pain
- Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, patients who will refuse transfusion, or patients with an active peptic ulcer or history of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the prior 3 months
- Patients with known mental or physical illness or known history of substance abuse that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy of less than one year
- Patients with severe allergy or known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin/bivalirudin, clopidogrel, nitinol, stainless steel alloy, and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
- Patients with a history of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the prior 6 months
- Patients with renal failure (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \[eGFR\] \<30 mL/min, calculated from serum creatinine by the Cockcroft-Gault formula)
- Patients with hepatic failure (Child-Pugh class C)
- Patients with hypercoagulable states that cannot be corrected by additional periprocedural heparin
- Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock at the time of the index procedure
- Patients with severe peripheral arterial, abdominal aortic, or thoracic aortic disease that precludes delivery sheath vascular access
- Patients in whom the aortic arch, innominate artery ostium, or proximal innominate artery is heavily calcified, severely atheromatous, or severely tortuous
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Keystone Heartlead
Study Sites (30)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Foundation for Cardiovascular Medicine
San Diego, California, 92122, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Delray Medical Center
Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, 60208, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Houma, Louisiana, 70360, United States
Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960, United States
New York University
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/NYPH
New York, New York, 10032, United States
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, 11576, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Pinnacle Health
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17101, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Baylor Heart and Vascular HospitalBaylor Heart and Vascular
Dallas, Texas, 75201, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Baylor Research Center
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
University of Bonn
Bonn, Germany
Universitats-Herzzentrum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Hamburg Univeristy Cardiovascular Center
Hamburg, Germany
Leipzig Heart Institute
Leipzig, Germany
San Donato Hospital
Milan, Italy
San Rafeele Hospital
Milan, Italy
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Lansky AJ, Grubman D, Dwyer MG 3rd, Zivadinov R, Parise H, Moses JW, Shah T, Pietras C, Tirziu D, Gambone L, Leon MB, Nazif TM, Messe SR. Clinical Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 20;84(8):712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.055.
PMID: 39142725DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study sample size was limited and imbalance in cohorts / randomization
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pauliina Margolis - CMO
- Organization
- Keystone Heart
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandra J Lansky, MD
alexandra.lansky@yale.edu
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2015
First Posted
August 31, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 18, 2021
Results First Posted
February 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02