Interventions to Increase Workplace Wellness
1 other identifier
interventional
682
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Behaviour changes such as improving nutrition, increasing physical activity, and decreasing obesity are linked with lower mortality and morbidity and fewer cancers. Health promotion programs in the workplace are a promising way to reach a large segment of the population. This project evaluated the efficacy of three approaches - all of which were based on previous research and programs with demonstrated positive benefits - on cancer-related outcomes (healthy eating, physical activity, normal body weight) and work-related outcomes (absenteeism, presenteeism).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2015
CompletedAugust 31, 2015
August 1, 2015
2.9 years
August 24, 2015
August 26, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in number of fruit and vegetable servings per day
Self-reported number of fruit and vegetable servings at baseline and 16 months
16 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Absenteeism (days)
16 months
Change in body weight (lbs)
16 months
Physical activity efficacy (minutes)
16 months
Participant perspectives on the program (theme)
16 months
Study Arms (3)
ALIVE
EXPERIMENTALEmail program N=170
CCS BCY
EXPERIMENTALComprehensive program N=285
ALIVE + CCS BCY
EXPERIMENTALEmail + comprehensive program N=225
Interventions
The company assigned to this condition offered employees participation in the ALIVE program. This program was validated in a previous worksite-based randomized controlled trial (RCT). A baseline assessment includes questions asking about: presence of children at home, habits related to cooking and eating out, physical activity preferences, stage of readiness of change, and perceived barriers to achieving heath behavior goals. This information provides the basis for immediate feedback and individually-tailored messages that include goal-setting and tips to achieve these goals, interactive features, and health information. Biweekly messages are sent for a total of 48 weeks. Outcome data were based on all individuals who completed the baseline assessment.
The company assigned to this condition participated in a comprehensive year-long workplace wellness program intervention focusing on nutrition, weight control, and physical activity, led by the CCS BCY. The program was modeled after a previous successful CCS BCY tobacco control worksite program. This program stresses the importance of developing social and environmental supports at the worksite to promote behavior change . Such supports could include food availability (e.g., cafeteria and vending machine selections), the built environment (e.g., availability of bike racks); social environment (e.g., group lunchtime walking clubs), and health communications (e.g., company newsletters). Outcome data were based on all individuals who completed the baseline assessment.
The company assigned to this condition received both the ALIVE and CCS BCY programs. Employees were encouraged to take part in both ALIVE and company initiatives, but participation in these activities was based on individual preference. Outcome data were based on all individuals who completed the baseline assessment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Employee of the company
- English speaking with reading level at Flesch-Kincaid 8.5 grade level
- Ability to provide access to individual work email address
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speaking without reading level at Flesch-Kincaid 8.5 grade level
- Inability to provide access to individual work email address
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- Canadian Cancer Society (CCS)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z3, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carolyn C Gotay, PhD
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2015
First Posted
August 31, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08