NCT02529033

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out the Lidco Rapid ( monitoring tool gives cardiac output) is as equivalent in determining the hemodynamic assessment in cardiac surgical scenarios as the most often used pulmonary artery catheter, which is much more invasive than the Lidco Rapid. This will be accomplished through online surveys which have different cardiac surgery scenarios and will be distributed to cardiac fellowship trained anesthesiologists. The online based survey will include a specific scenario and details on the scenario represented in image format and a brief description of the patient to aid with their analysis of the situation.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 3, 2015

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 3, 2015

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2023

Conditions

Low Cardiac Output

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To expect difference is within 1 unit ( scale of 1 to 5) in the hemodynamic assessment preferably preload , afterload and contractility between Lidco and data from PA catheter in different cardiac surgical patient scenarios.

    intraoperative

Interventions

LIDCO Rapid, Pulmonary artery catheterDEVICE

Hemodynamic monitoring systems

Eligibility Criteria

Age28 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Cardiac Fellowship trained Anesthesiologists

You may qualify if:

  • Must be a certified Anesthesiologist with cardiac fellowship training

You may not qualify if:

  • none

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R212. doi: 10.1186/cc9335. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

    PMID: 21092290BACKGROUND

  • Broch O, Renner J, Hocker J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schottler J, Steinfath M, Bein B. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R76. doi: 10.1186/cc10065. Epub 2011 Feb 28.

    PMID: 21356060BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Output, Low

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Sudhakar Subramani, M.D.

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2015

First Posted

August 19, 2015

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05