p16 and Ki-67 Stainings and Natural Killer (NK) Cells in CIN-II Management
Predictive Value of p16 and Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Staining and NK Cells in Expectant Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2
1 other identifier
observational
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN-II) patients followed up without treatment for 24 months according to p16 and ki-67 immunohistochemical staining and to the expression of NK cell receptors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedApril 20, 2016
April 1, 2016
3.9 years
August 7, 2015
April 19, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Status of cervix pathology using cervical smear test (CIN grade)
Cervical cytology test and colposcopy every 4 months starting with diagnose CIN-II or CIN-III means presence of lesion, CIN-I is regression of the lesion, and Negative is abscence of lesion.
2 years
Study Arms (1)
Conservative management
Patients diagnosed of CIN-II by directed biopsy
Interventions
Control of CIN-II with cytology and colposcopy to try to avoid unnecessary surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Adult females with CIN-II lesion on cervical biopsy that agree to a conservative management during a period not more than 24 months, referred to the low genital tract diseases clinic of Hospital del Mar.
You may qualify if:
- preferred expectant management than immediate treatment
- exocervical histological diagnosis of CIN-II
- lesion completely visualized by colposcopy
- entire squamocolumnar junction of the cervix was visible
- showing no evidence of any immunodeficiency disease
- no history of previous cervical treatment
- could be followed-up every four months during one year
- signed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- not coming to follow up appointments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Discacciati MG, de Souza CA, d'Otavianno MG, Angelo-Andrade LA, Westin MC, Rabelo-Santos SH, Zeferino LC. Outcome of expectant management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women followed for 12 months. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Apr;155(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
PMID: 21193261BACKGROUNDTsoumpou I, Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Wentzensen N, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Malamou-Mitsi V, Paraskevaidis E. p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 May;35(3):210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
PMID: 19261387BACKGROUNDdel Pino M, Garcia S, Fuste V, Alonso I, Fuste P, Torne A, Ordi J. Value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of progression/regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):488.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.046. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
PMID: 19683687BACKGROUNDGalgano MT, Castle PE, Atkins KA, Brix WK, Nassau SR, Stoler MH. Using biomarkers as objective standards in the diagnosis of cervical biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Aug;34(8):1077-87. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e8b2c4.
PMID: 20661011BACKGROUNDGuedes AC, Brenna SM, Coelho SA, Martinez EZ, Syrjanen KJ, Zeferino LC. p16(INK4a) Expression does not predict the outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Sep-Oct;17(5):1099-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00899.x. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
PMID: 17367324BACKGROUNDMcAllum B, Sykes PH, Sadler L, Macnab H, Simcock BJ, Mekhail AK. Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):478.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.069. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
PMID: 21872201BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
Citologies and biopsies of the cervix. Blood cells.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gemma Mancebo, PhD
Parc de Salut Mar
- STUDY CHAIR
Ramon Carreras, PhD
Parc de Salut Mar
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2015
First Posted
August 13, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04