Carbon Dioxide Laser vs. Electrocoagulation for the Therapy of Condyloma
Carbon Dioxide Laser Ablation Versus Electrocoagulation - a Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Two Surgical Treatments in Women Undergoing Therapy for Condyloma Acuminata
1 other identifier
interventional
114
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In a randomized clinical trial of 114 women undergoing Treatment for condyloma acuminata, two surgical methods, the carbon dioxide laser Ablation and the excision by electrocoagulation, will be compared. The primary outcome of the study is the cosmetic result judged by the Patient 6 weeks after Treatment using a 11-step visual analogue scale (VAS), secondary outcomes are intervention time, operative complications, subjects and users satisfaction, postoperative pain and recurrence of genital warts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
August 19, 2025
August 1, 2025
10 years
August 4, 2015
August 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cosmetic result
Cosmetic result judged by the Patient 6 weeks after Treatment using a 11-step visual analogue scale (VAS)
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
users satisfaction
30 minutes
Operation time
20 minutes
Postoperative pain
5 hours
Subjects satisfaction
6 weeks
Recurrence of genital warts
12 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Carbon dioxide Laser ablation
EXPERIMENTALExcision of genital warts using a carbon dioxide laser, ie CO2 Laser
Electrocoagulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORExcision of genital warts using a superficial electrical coagulation mode, ie spray coagulation
Interventions
surgical Instrument to achieve excision of genital warts by a pulsed laser of 15 Watt voltage
surgical Instrument to achieve excision of genital warts by a deep tissue electrocoagulation of 80 Watt voltage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- informed consent
- women with anogenital affection of condyloma acuminata
You may not qualify if:
- significant language barrier
- pregnancy
- unwillingness to participate
- the use of blood thinner or known coagulation disorder
- the use of immunosuppressive medicament
- HIV-Infection
- malignant diseases
- local therapy within 8 weeks before Treatment
- wound healing disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Ruhr University Bochum
Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44625, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ziad Hilal, Dr. med.
Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. med. Ziad Hilal
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2015
First Posted
August 13, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
August 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share